
In the States, mainstream media types have called Michael Moore's
Sicko his "least political film". But in his interview with
Thomas Sotinel, the
Le Monde reporter states that this seems to be Michael's coming-out as "a socialist". To which
Moore answers (retranslated from the French) that, in a scene in Sicko,
I film myself on Marx's tomb. Nobody mentioned it. In the reviews in America, they wrote, "it's his least political film." And I say: "Dude, I am on Marx's Tomb!" Do I need to take out a baseball bat and hit them on the head [for them to understand]?!
In case
you hadn't understood, this says — and this reveals — almost more about the powers-that-be (both in the U.S. and abroad) than about
Michael Moore: being on the socialist/marxist-bordering left, for the MSM and America's Eastern élites (as for Europe's MSM and élites), is mainstream, is normal, is understandable, is OK, is cool. It is avant-garde. Beyond being (naturally) avant-garde and therefore (obviously) a positive and endearing trait, it hardly bares mentioning. And it is "not political" (that's only a dirty game that America's hit-below-the-belt Republicans play).
Update: As far as I know, the best answer to Michael Moore's Sicko arguments is provided by Stuart Browning's
Free Market Cure films…
More on
Michael Moore in the archives (2004-2016)…