Friday, February 06, 2026

Epstein Scandal: No Matter How Clever You Think Trump Is, You Do Not Appreciate His Brilliance Enough


No matter how shrewd you (rightfully) think Donald Trump is, you do not appreciate his brains enough.

Admit it, like myself you have been wondering why Trump and Pam Bondi did not immediately release the documents relating to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, as the GOP candidate promised during his 2024 campaign. Lots of conservatives have been extremely vocal in their criticism of the (non-)move. It turns out that the White House was completely right to do so (or, rather, to refrain from doing so) and that there was/is method to 47's madness. 

They knew how intertwined Europe's élites (not just the Scandinavians) have been with Epstein and his island (photos above and below of Norway's Crown Princess Mette-Marit — who may now be denied the option to ever become queen when her husband ascends the throne — and the country's former prime minister Thorbjørn Jagland who has additionally held several international posts).

In the past year, The Democrat Party's Locofocos have gone increasingly bonkers over releasing the Epstein files, which they assumed must contain the most sordid revelations on Donald Trump. As millions of documents are released, it turns out that to a large extent (to nobody's surprise), it is mainly leftists, American as well as foreign, who are embroiled. Or, as Wretchard the Cat puts it, eloquently:
The irony is the Epstein files were supposed to sink MAGA but the torpedoes are running circular.
Thanks to the Republican president holding back on his promise, foreign élites will not now be able to accuse their "tactless," "brainless," and "inconsiderate" nemesis of gratuitously and irresponsibly releasing the confidential documents, as it is the Democrats' drama queens — their fellow leftist allies (whom they support in just about every endeavor) — who have been fighting to make the documents public. They are the only ones, or certainly the main ones, to blame. 

I wouldn't be surprised if, during his talks with foreign officials (unless the premier talked to is part of the visitor roster to Little Saint James) over the past 12 months, the president has in private been repeatedly saying: "By the way, Look, I am trying to hold the fort here; a lot of people in your country are mentioned in the files and that's why I have been trying to limit their release, but the Democrats' fire eaters may leave us no choice."

Genius.

(Many links above are from Scandinavia i.e., in Danish and Norwegian; below are several in English.)
In related news: Calling Epstein "A math nerd with charisma",  reports that The Epstein Enigma Unravels Ever-So Slightly in Bannon Interview:
Jeffrey Epstein called himself a “hermit” in two hours of 2019 interview footage just released. This seemed strange but probably on one level accurate. Despite his name invading the news with increasing ferocity over the last two decades, Epstein’s Woody Allen-ish voice remained completely unknown to me, and perhaps to many who follow current events, until his conversation with Steve Bannon was uploaded to YouTube. Stranger still, watching Epstein discourse on myriad topics for two hours resulted in no compulsion to immediately take a shower. Unlike with, say, Harvey Weinstein or Jimmy Savile, the mere look of Epstein did not provoke a visceral reaction of disgust. The disgust comes on an intellectual level after actively thinking about his deviance rather than on a physiognomic level while passively watching him speak. In fact, the more Epstein talked to Bannon, the more I wanted him to talk — and for Bannon to let him. He mesmerized. A reason beyond the money and the dark pleasures of Epstein Island existed for so many people to voluntarily pursue his company. Epstein was, to use an albeit overused word, brilliant. This superlative risks upsetting a coalition of simpletons and highbrains, who regard "smart," "intelligent," and "genius" as shorthand for every other positive attribute to include "righteous," "wise," "prudent," "dependable," and "good." Tellingly, the Marine Corps includes "intelligence" nowhere in its 14 leadership traits.  …
Click here for The Guardian's report of Steve Bannon's interview of Epstein.
Speaking of Epstein being "brilliant" — a word that would never be used for Donald Trump — Dennis Prager has stated numerous times that 
People tend to be preoccupied with intelligence. But intelligence leads nowhere if you don't have common sense and clarity. In short, “brains” aren’t that important. Almost everyone is intelligent enough to handle life well. 
The founder of PragerU says that what matters is that young people become good, adding that

Societies are preoccupied with just about everything other than making good people. For some, it is intelligence. Parents are often more concerned with their children’s IQs than their children’s characters. And many people confuse higher education with decency and moral insight.

 

Wednesday, February 04, 2026

"Verbal Violence Erected as a Method of Intimidation": Le Monde on Charles Kushner, "a relay of Trumpist diplomacy in Paris"

 
In a full-page article, Charles Kushner, a relay of Trumpist diplomacy in Paris, Le Monde — aka France's newspaper of record and therefore the French equivalent of the New York Times — has published an in-depth piece on Trump's ambassador to Paris in which Philippe Karsenty is interviewed and in which, needless to say, feels it necessary to mention every controversial part (real or otherwise) of Jared's father through the decades, notably his public criticism of French anti-semitism.

The 71-year-old diplomat, who took up his post in May 2025, is the father of Jared Kushner, Donald Trump's son-in-law and US envoy to the Middle East. Like his son, he favors unorthodox methods and does not hesitate to interfere in French domestic affairs.

 … American diplomacy has entered a new era, where interference in the internal affairs of an allied country is no longer taboo. “The term ‘diplomacy’ is not appropriate for Trumpism, a mixture of obsessions and impulsive whims, followed by escalation, abandonment, sudden disinterest, and verbal violence,” analyzes Hubert Védrine, the former diplomatic advisor to François Mitterrand. …/… 

Business Negotiations 

Appointed to Paris on May 19, 2025, the 71-year-old reiterates that he hardly sought this position, as he is not a diplomat and readily admits it. Charles Kushner is cut from the same cloth as businessman Steve Witkoff, Trump's friend and emissary tasked with negotiating peace in Ukraine and the Middle East. The septuagenarian likes to speak his mind and use direct methods, according to those close to him. In his view, international relations are similar to business negotiations, made up of slammed doors, intimidation, and reconciliations. And "President Trump is a very good businessman," he boasted in an interview on LCI on August 28. 

“Charles Kushner isn't engaging in social niceties; he's on a mission. He's carrying the message of Trump's actions. They have grandchildren in common,” declares Philippe Karsenty, a former elected official in Neuilly-sur-Seine and now the spokesman for le Comité Trump France. Mr. Kushner’s mission? “To open France’s eyes to global issues,” continues the representative of Trump supporters in Paris, who describes Donald Trump as “Europe’s Viagra, our last chance to avoid being swept away by history.”

 … In direct contact with the White House chief, the ambassador is now multiplying meetings with his European counterparts to take the pulse of an Old Continent despised by the Trump administration. … “Charles Kushner does not want France in 2026 to resemble France in 1939,” declares Mr. Karsenty.  

 … Shunning the media – he refused requests from Le Monde – and not speaking French, the ambassador seems, since then, to have been exploring with curiosity the political landscape of his host country, accompanied by his chief of staff, Gabriel Scheinmann, who is perfectly fluent in French.

 … [Among the Frenchmen that Charles Kushner has met is] the First Secretary of the Socialist Party, Olivier Faure, on December 16. The left-wing leader recalls hearing his interlocutor steer every conversation back to "business" and making the American laugh by explaining that "in our country, we don't use our credit cards to go to the hospital." Charles Kushner seemed disconcerted by "this country where people work thirty-five hours a week and retire at 62 and a bit," Mr. Faure remembers. "He thought we were all Soviets."


Tuesday, February 03, 2026

The Trumpinoscope on French TV: Is the opposition of American stars against Donald Trump effective or simply symbolic?

At the Grammy Awards, do artists act as a counterweight to power? Is the opposition
of American stars against Donald Trump effective or nothing more than symbolic? 

Monday evening I was interviewed by France Info Télévision's Loïc de la Mornais in a segment of Sur le Terrain (In the Field) called le Trumpinoscope

In the full 1:54:38 show, about Donald Trump, Minnesota, and the Grammies, the police car chase mentioned in a post yesterday is broadcast between 1:03:17 and 1:05:48 while the American report can be seen between 1:08:54 and 1:31:13, with myself appearing between 1:19:29 and 1:25:00. (I was duly impressed, because they not only mentioned the book I wrote 20 years ago, they found the cover to the first edition.)

The easiest thing, though, is simply to click on the links at Sur le Terrain and le Trumpinoscope which are shorter videos (22:11) devoted entirely to the American segment and in which I appear from 10:39 to 16:08. (Merci pour l'Instalien, Sarah.)

 

"Sur le terrain" du 2 février 2026 : l’opposition des stars américaines contre Donald Trump, efficace ou symbolique ?



Loïc de la Mornais s'intéresse dans cette deuxième partie à la cérémonie très politique cette année des Grammy Awards, ayant eu lieu aux États-Unis et où les stars américaines ont largement pris la parole pour dénoncer la politique anti-immigration de Donald Trump. Une séquence à retrouver dans l'émission "Sur le terrain" diffusée entre 21 h et 23 h sur la chaîne info, canal 16.

Les invités de "Sur le terrain" du lundi 2 février 2026 sont :

  • • Érik Svane, membre des “Republicans” en France
  • • Tristan Cabello, historien et spécialiste des États-Unis
  • • Michel Mompontet, éditorialiste international France Télévisions
  

Loïc de la Mornais s'intéresse dans cette première partie au vote du budget en France, adopté lundi 2 février par l’Assemblée nationale après plusieurs mois de débats et de rebondissements. Une séquence à retrouver dans l'émission "Sur le terrain" diffusée entre 21 h et 23 h sur la chaîne info, canal 16.

Les invités de "Sur le terrain" du lundi 2 février 2026 sont :

  • • Isabelle Ficek, cheffe du service France des Échos
  • • Luc Gras, politologue
  • • Isabelle This Saint-Jean, économiste et professeure à l’Université Sorbonne-Nord