Thursday, April 30, 2026
Radio Courtoisie: The Satanic Character of Today's American Left
War & Peace: USA Supporter Says It Is Nuts for French Media to Present Trump as "Reeling" and "Desperate" While Iranian Leaders Are Described as "Celebrating"
BFM TV - 22 avril 2026 - Trump temporise - Analyse de la situation au Liban
Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Radio Europe 1: An army of shadows on the social networks destroys all the right's arguments while promoting the left's narratives
Among Europe 1's guests on Christine Kelly et vous (42:33-58:22) on Monday on the subject of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump were Gabrielle Cluzel and our old friend Philippe Karsenty. Gabrielle Cluzel (48:34) said that
There is a type of conspiracy theories that are chic … So, you see, on the right you are treated as an abominable conspiracy theorist, if you start speaking about immigration, "you are awful conspiracy theorists"; on the other hand, whenever the Left is behind far-fetched theories, we get, "oh it's not serious", we are asked to believe them.
While the spokesman for the Comité Trump France made these revelations:
This situation of demonization leads to dehumanization and a desire to see [Trump] eliminated. … And the social networks have been taken over by an army of shadows which destroys all the arguments on the right while promoting the left's narratives. (8:33)
Immediately prior to their debate on the Trump assassination attempt, Philippe Karsenty talked with Christine Kelly about another, albeit far from unrelated, subject on which the spokesman for le Comité Trump France is not only an expert but probably the foremost expert: a discussion about the Al-Durah hoax and how, even today, 26 years later, that hoax reflects on the government censorship and fake news aspects on French television (37:47, 39:21-42:32) — something which the leftists on the current Alloncle commission on the neutrality of France's public TV and radio station seems intent on whitewashing.
Attaque sur Trump : “Quand c’est la gauche qui est complotiste, on ne dit rien !” (Gabrielle Cluzel)
Attaque sur Trump : “Quand c’est la gauche qui est complotiste, on ne dit rien !” (Gabrielle Cluzel)
Commission sur l’audiovisuel public : "ce sujet, qui est vraiment le plus gros scandale qui aurait dû exploser sur cette commission d'enquête, a été éteint" déclare @pkarsenty porte-parole du Comité Trump France #ChristineKellyEtVous @christine_kelly #Europe1 pic.twitter.com/jM47FxMMdJ
— Europe 1 (@Europe1) April 27, 2026
No Wonder There Is So Much Hostility to Trump and the Republicans When They Are Constantly Being Called Racists, Nazis, and a Threat to Democracy
Following the assassination attempt on Donald Trump at the White House Correspondents' Association on Saturday evening, I was invited to appear on France Info Sunday around 3:10 PM.
(Here is the French version of this article: Rien d'anormal quant à l'hostilité ambiante contre Trump et les Républicains quand les Démocrates les taxent sans cesse de Fascistes et de Nazis.)
Aside from noting that the "political polarization" is entirely due to the Democrats, that if anything the attack justifies Trump's decision to build a ballroom in the White House, and that calling Donald Trump a "Christ-like figure" is absurd given how the left idolizes "saints" such as Barack Obama, Che Guevara, Mao, Lenin, etc., here, in essence, is what I said:
No Republican I know is surprised by the assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
When you constantly call people racists, fascists, Nazis, or the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler, it's hardly surprising that you want to confront these kinds of monsters by beating them up or even assassinating them. Even doing anything to bring about the Republicans' defeat at the polls—including election rigging. And why not?! After all, it's about stopping… Adolf Hitler.
Indeed, Greg Gutfeld called Cole Allen the only rational member of the Democratic Party, since he was the only one who wanted to (re)act on this "threat to democracy."
This guy was not a crank. He was not deranged. Don't buy into that narrative, because it lets these pompous asses off. … He was just following orders. He was operating on a filter that said Trump was Hitler, and therefore it would be immoral if you didn't take Hitler out. So his filter is actually making him logical. He's the sanest one in the group because he took them at their word. [When] MS-NOW says "Trump is Hitler", he's the sensible one! He went after Hitler! … You can't write this off as a deranged person!
Are you aware of the numerous attacks on minorities in the US? A Black man complains that he found a noose hanging from a tree in his backyard. A gay or lesbian student complains that homophobic graffiti was left on their dorm room door.
After a police investigation, it turns out that in almost every case, the alleged victim created the "crime" themselves in order to belong to the victim class.
Why? Since—contrary to what the melodrama enthusiasts constantly claim—there are not enough displays of hatred and racism (!) in the US, the left is determined to create them at all costs.
Over at Issues & Insights, Armando Simón has a compendium of hate crime hoaxes, while Fabius Maximus has many more examples. Turn also to the Fake Hate Crimes Database, which "builds on the work of Laird Wilcox, whose Crying Wolf (PDF) is the original book on this subject. The books Hate Crime Hoax and Hate Crimes: Criminal Law & Identity Politics are recommended."
That's is the reason why I call leftists, regardless of their country of origin, drama queens (locofocos, fireeaters).
• Three assassination attempts (at least) on Donald Trump.
• In June 2017, a man opened fire on Republican elected officials while they were practicing for the traditional charity baseball game. Steve Scalise was hit. It turned out that James Hodgkinson was a Bernie Sanders supporter who had read that Republicans were racist fascists. This information was disseminated, among others, by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).
• In Virginia, it transpires that one Jay Jones running for the office of attorney general in 2025 fantasized not only about putting two bullets in the head of a Republican opponent but watching his children get gunned down as well.
• A man, armed, attacked a fertility clinic in 2011. He had read that the SPLC had called them "hateful."
• In September 2025, Charlie Kirk was assassinated during a meeting at a university in Utah. At his funeral, his supporters sont were called Nazis—including last September by former French government minister Aurélie Filippetti on this channel—and the SPLC had recently decided to add its Turning Point USA to the list of "hate groups" that, according to the left, are proliferating in the US.
All these would-be assassins acted after being Pushed To The Edge by reading that Democratic politicians and left-leaning journalists—not to mention teachers, like Cole Allen himself, in charge of educating America's youth—are calling these conservatives racists, fascists, Nazis, and an existential threat to democracy, while calling for "Maximum Warfare everywhere, all the time" against them. Let's not forget that throughout his presidency, Joe Biden referred to Charlottesville to brag about leading the fight against so-called white supremacists.
Above all, these assassins acted after the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) labeled their targets racist and this NGO placed their names, or the groups they belong to, on its infamous "hate map."
However, the American press has either ignored or downplayed the major scandal that the FBI has just uncovered. When the SPLC raises millions of dollars to combat racism and extremism, they have used these funds—get this—not to fight the Ku Klux Klan and its affiliates, but rather to finance them—a notorious example being the torchlight procession in Charlottesville in 2017.
"They lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups — even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes," FBI Director Kash Patel said.
"That is illegal, and this is an ongoing investigation against all individuals involved."
… "Donors gave their money believing they were supporting the fight against violent extremism," Kevin Davidson, the acting U.S. attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, said in a statement. "As alleged, the SPLC instead diverted a portion of those funds to benefit individuals and groups they claimed to oppose," Davidson added.
(from Neo-Nazi, Klan 'Cyclops' and ‘Sadistic’ biker … 5 of the most shocking SPLC informants)
As Greg Gutfeld comments on Gutfeld!, this is how circular reasoning works. It is "a circular process: you must fund racists to get more racism to then fund more racists," meaning that "The party that started the KKK is still paying the KKK."
Memes have started flooding in:
SPLC: "In order to fight racism, we have to pay people to be racist."
"There's so little white supremacy, so we had to pay the SPLC to manufacture it."
What conclusions can be drawn from this charade?
The hatred of American conservatives is unfounded. The country is not a hell-hole of racism or a nightmare of fascism — far from it. The vast majority of American citizens are good people. There is so little racism in America, so few fascists in the United States, that the Left has to fabricate them, exaggerate their numbers, and (last but not least)… subsidize them.
In fact, the only hatred that exists is against the Republicans, who are demonized to the extreme, and the only extremists are the radical leftists who present themselves as holier-than-thou saints.
Update — Radio Europe 1: An army of shadows on the social networks destroys all the right's arguments while promoting the left's narrativesGreg Gutfeld just delivered the single most succinct and cutting indictment of the leftwing media's complicity in Saturday's WHCD attack:
— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) April 27, 2026
"This guy did hear voices. They were Ted Lieu's, they were Brandon Johnson's, they were CNN's, they were The View, they were MS NOW."
"I… pic.twitter.com/1uuULdANGy
Friday, April 24, 2026
Modern French Anti-Americanism Regarding World War II: Distrust for Yankee G.I.s Coupled with Adulation for the Red Army
- Obsessions françaises sur la 2e guerre mondiale
- Les 4 Vérités Hebdo nº 1539, 3 avril 2026, p 6
Yet, it is not the tens of thousands of Xerxes' Persian soldiers who are hailed as brave, as heroes (even in Iran); it is the Spartans of King Leonidas who lost "only" a few hundred warriors.
Which brings us back to France in the 20th and 21st centuries, where we are constantly told that because the USSR supposedly lost some 50 times more lives than America during World War II, Europe owes the Russians more gratitude than the Americans.
In fact, I have never heard a conversation in France about the war without someone saying: "But les Ricains (the Yanks — short for les (Amé)ricains) did it only for their own (economic) interests."
Following Évelyne Joslain's article on the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe last summer (Les 4 Vérités # 1495), one reader reacted with outrage by what he called a "rewriting of history": "The Anglo-American troops," he insisted, "weren't heroes but amateurs fighting for their country's economic interests and nothing else."
Many French people don't seem to realize it, but if anyone is fooled by this rewriting of history, it's none other than themselves: with leftist lies, everything is turned upside down.
The Americans, not the communists, are accused of waging war for their "own interests." While the peoples—nay, while entire nations—who are praised for their innate courage are the Soviets, not the Yanks.
Besides, have you noticed, whatever they do, the Americans can't win. ("Damned if you do, damned if you don't.") When they go to war, it's for nefarious reasons. And when they try to stay out of war, they are condemned for their neutrality.
Indeed, it's a rewriting of history to claim that the war began when Hitler invaded Poland. It's more accurate to say that the war (aka Stalin's War) began when Hitler and Stalin jointly invaded Poland, the Wehrmacht the western part, and the Red Army (two weeks later) the eastern part. Yes, for the first two years of the conflict, the Nazis and the Communists were allies. The truth is that the war would never have started without Stalin's approval and participation.
"If you are kind to the cruel, you will eventually become cruel to the kind."This explains all Leftist politics in general, in any country, and is particularly true of the French indulgence towards the Soviets in the 1940s, contrasted with the mistrust of the supposedly treacherous Americans.
Saturday, April 18, 2026
A Historic Power Imbalance? The Left's use of the word “problematic” does not explicitly state the problem; We are to intuit it — There is a kind of délicatesse involved…

When my fellow academics refer — as they started doing a great deal toward the end of the last century — to the problematics of a topic, they are listing not annoying things that need to be fixed but intriguing twists that deserve extended consideration.
These days, the plural “problematics,” as wrinkle-browed exegesis of complex academic issues, is a marginal term. So is the straightforward sense of “problematic” meaning “full of problems,” as in “Sunflowers are problematic as a large-scale crop.” The word is in wide circulation, but its current incarnation is as a euphemism for a very specific kind of problem or a very specific kind of person.
Its newest usage is a way to say, without saying, that something is perpetuating a historic power imbalance — especially when it comes to race. An example is “Your fave is problematic,” a catchphrase that got around for a while starting in the 2010s as a way to call out fandom for people whose values are deemed to be incorrect. Fandom for the television host Trevor Noah earned this designation when a series of his old tweets, including coarse jokes about subjects such as “fat chicks,” surfaced in 2015. The most recent star deemed to be problematic was Patti LuPone, who in a recent New Yorker article referred with rather acrid dismissal to two Black stage stars.
It’s significant that this use of the word “problematic” does not explicitly state the problem. We are to intuit it. There is a kind of délicatesse in this, a way to circumvent the thorny national conversation about concepts such as intersectionality, wokeness and cancel culture. That impulse toward euphemism, too, is a natural part of language. And it is no less clear as a result.
In other words, what is problematic is something to feel ashamed about. I.e., it has something to do with "racism" and (what is preposterously called) America's "original sin." Typical leftist mentality…
Note to leftists: all societies throughout history have had historic power imbalances (although rarely racial). Nothing did more to correct these than America's capitalism — a synonym for the free market.
… As for the ancient Greeks, the transformation of a word that meant to propose something would surely have struck them as otherworldly. But then again, “nice” started out meaning “ignorant.” In any language, plus ça change … well, the more they change.
One last problem for consideration: You might imagine someone of Harding’s era would recognize the expression “no problem,” but it didn’t really come into circulation until the 1960s. Sometimes what seem like very ordinary words or expressions are recent coinages. My favorite example is “oink.” The first written “oink” is in 1910. Before that, a child who was asked what pigs say would probably answer either “squeak” or “wee-wee,” as in the little piggy that went “wee-wee-wee all the way home.” And if you think about it, “wee-wee” is closer to the sound of pigs than “oink.” Bring back “wee-wee”!
Friday, April 17, 2026
In the Beginning, America's Democrats and the Europeans Alike Strongly Supported Israel; What Happened? The Jews Had the Gall to Stop Acting Like Communists
What has happened to the Democratic Party? The strong support for the creation of the state of Israel in the immediate aftermath of World War II by Democrats convinced Harry Truman to support the motion at the UN for Israel's creation (among other factors). About 70% of American Jews either identify as Democrats or vote Democratic in elections.
… these Jewish figures … are first and foremost left-wing before they are Jewish. And there is nothing more dangerous for the Jewish people and Israel than left-wing Jews. They are the ones who have led Israel to its worst defeats, to its worst compromises. They are the ones who got one of the worst American presidents toward Israel elected: Barack Obama. They are the ones who got the Islamist Zohran Mamdani elected mayor of New York… Left-wing Jews are narcissistic masochists, corrupt financially or intellectually.… [The al-Durah] affair illustrates the profound bad faith of the left and its conspiracy-minded cronies who claim that the French press is serving "Zionist propaganda." In reality, from France Télévisions to Le Monde, including Libération and L'Humanité, the overwhelming majority of the media landscape adopts, on the contrary, an obsessively hateful stance towards Israel, as everyone could see after the massacre of October 7th. … Leftism is a mental illness!




