Behind the Façades in France: What expats and the mainstream media (French and American alike) fail to notice (or fail to tell you) about French attitudes, principles, values, and official positions…
Thanks to Damian Bennett for opening his latest diatribe with a hat tip to myself:
If you haven't been to ¡NP! recently, please go read ES's longGimmigrant post. It is an impolitic, impolite exposé of immigrant replacement and the West's willful complicity in its own demise. It may not tell you anything you don't already know, but it certainly will challenge you to openly admit to that knowledge, freeing you from the suppression of polite-think.
This email complements that post, connecting two huge dots that define the crisis. The first dot is Secretary of State Marco Rubio's speech at the Pynx overlooking the Acropolis, which deserves a read in full. This big 3,586-word dot, well researched and well written, makes the case for the primacy of Western civilization. It says much that is impolitic because it is true, obvious, and visceral -- but unfashionable. The speech while paying respects to the ancient Greeks gives a very clear picture of the United States under the Trump administration, a bold, resurgent, unapologetic United States, grounded in the ideals and morals of Western civilization pursuant to its own interests.
Here, in Athens, we found the first full realization of all the essential traits that would come to define the West: fierce individuality and relentless ambition; daring exploration and invention; a yearning for discovery, for adventure, risk and glory. An insatiable curiosity about the world and the principles by which it operates, a hunger to know the mysteries of nature and grasp the secrets of the cosmos. An impatience with the notion of impossibility, chafing at all boundaries and limits, straining to peer into the depths of the unknown. ... Now I know that to modern ears, what I just described, this way of life, may sound odd; it may even sound cruel. The ideal of many ideologies in our time has, frankly, become a world of perfect safety, devoid of risk or failure, with neither the glory of victory nor the shame of defeat.
Too often these days, we build downwards. We design our standards to ensure no one will lose; we preoccupy ourselves more with the comfort of the worst than the potential of the best. We hold the most exceptional things among us hostage to the average, the ordinary, the mediocre. ... And now, today, we find ourselves at a crossroads. Because the next decade and the decisions we make will write the story of the next century. The course we take will determine whether the West maintains its place at the head of the world or resigns itself to a future of atrophy and servitude and decline. We will either choose to act now or lose the choice to act at all. Under President Trump, the United States has made its choice. We choose the unapologetic pursuit of national power: to take back control of our critical supply chains, toreindustrializeour economy, to rebuild our defense, to fight for dominance of the technologies and industries of the future.
There are any number of powers arrayed against a country-first America but the real dangers are within, vast numbers, millions, of unassimilated, unassimilable, hostile illegal immigrants, the greater part of whom are male, of military age, and Muslim. The seditious left has teamed up with the Islamists (Ha-ha-HA!), who represent the enforcement 'muscle' of an Islamo-left insurrection-in-the-making. This brings us to thesecond very big dot from an earlier ¡NP! post that quotes authorLarry Alex Tauntonextensively.
All of this[various factors in the fall of Rome]was somewhere in the back of my mind, a feeling at first, as I observed the third worlders making their way by the millions to our borders. I saw them in the violence of Africa, the intrigues of the Middle East, and everywhere there is misery south of our border.Generally speaking, they are a people inured to suffering (theirs or that of others), are accustomed to death, unaccustomed to the comforts Americans take for granted, have lived in nothing but squalor, do not share your views of private property or civil discourse, view violence as a part of daily life, lack even the most basic education, and have little sympathy for the low pain threshold of Americans.
THESE ARE THE PEOPLE COMING TO TAKE YOUR INHERITANCE FROM YOU.Coming from a “might makes right” world, they know no other policy. They have no vested interest in preserving American law or culture, and that is because it isn’t their heritage and they don’t understand it. Democrats seem to think they will be immune from all of this because they foolishly believe these newcomers will view them as benefactors. … Once you open the castle gates and lower the drawbridge, you no longer control the outcome. Indeed, you have surrendered it.And why are Democrats willing to do that? Because they hate Americans more than this still ill-defined rabble, and they don’t understand what’s coming. These people are tougher than you, and they don’t give a damn about you. Be careful how you vote. The future you hope for will be, I promise, very different from the rosy one media promises you.
I commented: "Mr. Taunton says the unsayable, but the unsayable is unhearable to the lefties. Illegals are the blueberry pickers and ballot fodder the childless left needs for their yogurt and elections. The most brutal psychopathic illegals -- rapists, human traffickers, fentanyl bosslings -- will be hired as guards at the re-education camps the lefties have planned for you and me."
RFK noted that Islamic (or Arab) cultures do not produce much of value for humanity as a wholebecause of the rise of fundamentalist extremism. He argued: “There’s 500 million Arabs in the world. And yet they don’t produce science. They don’t win the Nobel Prize. They don’t win theFields Prize. They don’t win theWolf Prize. They don’t produce literature.”
SO. What does connecting these two big dots tell us? American greatness is a product of Western Civilization, and Western Civilization is incompatible with a third world acculturated tosqualorandmiseryandviolence; Western Civilization is wholly antithetical to Islam, all Islam, not just the psychopathic variety.
The pretense that all cultures are equal is ridiculous. Failed cultures are not equal to successful cultures. Reparations, DEI, cut-to-front-of-the-line victimhood privileges, liberal guilt, none of these can correct or raise up a failed culture. You can't assert cultural equivalency if your life is subsidized by a government or claiming victimhood (the loser in a cultural competition).
The quisling DNC is real. The violent Islamo-left is real. The Deep State Color Revolution is also real. Western Civilization is under attack and it's time to put its enemies on notice -- it's time to brace up and prepare for the worst.
Bennett's diatribe inspires Duncan Hill to make the following remarks:
One of our biggest near-term enemies (if not the biggest) is the media. The propaganda has gone nuclear. Walter Lippmann said in 1922 that "the media is not your friend." Today, the media is our puppeteer performing a mass psychosis.
No sooner does Trump file a deformation suit against Murdoch than a hit piece appears on Fox website discouraging Republican prospects in the election.
I must admit, I got a sense of discouragement listening to these non-thinkers who operate solely on emotion (the propaganda technique used was Band Wagoning...everyone is thinking this way). And, of course, all was said with emotion...to key the brain to abandon rationality. How many of these pathetic pawns are wandering around? Here in Connecticut I encounter them daily.
No matter how the election goes, I suspect that the Dem foot soldiers have been whipped up into such a frenzy that there will be violence after the elections.
Meanwhile, we are threatened with AI domination and Nuclear Armageddon all to scare us into submission. Who's in the market for a house with an underground bunker?
The "reporter" is so thrilled...keying our brains again.
You'd think that with all this hyperventilating, people would catch on. BTW, what happened to Global Warming? Oh, that's right, they need non-"green" energy to fuel the data centers.
And then there is Rubio's speech. I'm glad you highlighted the Western foundational principles. America needs to hear those over and over again.
Duncan Hill's answer in turn inspires Damian Bennett to reply as follows:
[The violence after the elections] isopenly discussed, planned, and promoted --
Expect carnage, nothing you can imagine sitting reading this because you are not depraved, nothing you would actually believe were it shown you (Q.E.D. liberation of the Nazi concentration camps; the one ace Holocaust deniers hold is that theHolocaust IS unbelievable, and yet...).
The Dark Powers have been busy. Ignored in isolation, the play becomes apparent when all the dirty business is aggregated:
Beyond Poland,Cynical Publiuspoints to a succession of crises ahead of the US midterms, arguing that their timing suggests a coordinated effort by globalist actors to foment instability.
Widespread civil unrest and riots in France.
Widespread civil unrest and riots in Albania.
Widespread civil unrest and riots in Italy.
Widespread civil unrest and riots in Spain.
Widespread civil unrest and riots in Portugal.
Widespread civil unrest and riots in Belgium.
Widespread civil unrest and riots in Serbia.
Widespread civil unrest and riots in Georgia.
Widespread civil unrest and an apparent judicial coup in Poland.
Widespread civil unrest and riots in Czechia (including an attempted takeover of the Parliament building).
Widespread student protests in Greece.
Targeted student protests in Indonesia.
Localized violent protests in India.
An apparently fraudulent election in Brazil where the presumed presidential election winner was forced to flee the country under threat of arrest by his opponent.
The uncovering of a Color Revolution plot in the USA led by embittered former USAID employees and ex-military members.
Lady and gents, these are but the warm-up acts. The BLM riots surprised the Demsandthe Deep State what could be doneand done on the cheap! They've been busy ever since gaming strategy and field-testing tactics. Europa is the Dark Powers' lab rat. America is the target.
Have you ever asked yourself if there are any parallels between POTUS1 and POTUS47 (aka POTUS45)? You should, because it turns out that there are quite a number, as I mentioned on a French radio station last summer as it celebrated America's 250th birthday, and pretty profound ones at that.
As the nation reacts to the "disgustingly violent" call by Hakeem Jeffries for "maximum warfare" against members of the GOP (and, more specifically, of Donald Trump's MAGA movement) and for Dems to "break their spirit", I think back to last summer.
One of the things that I did during the previous summer, those depressing months of 2025 (during which this blog was, for unexplained reasons, subject to a ban, a ban which was not lifted until 112 days later), was read Ron Chernow's biography of Ulysses Simpson Grant. (This proved an unexpected boon, as reading about Grant's travails and hardships proved to be somewhat therapeutic for me);
Last summer this year (2026), I read Ron Chernow's Pulitzer Prize-winner on George Washington's life.
And all of the quotes come from his 817-page biography of the first president of the United States.
• First, comparing Donald Trump's war tactics and strategy with those of General Washington during the revolutionary war (although this might perhaps simply be an American way of waging war) — just like Trump's bombings focused on taking out Iran's leadership (not to mention his Caracas raid taking out Venezuela's lider maximo), the men in George Washington's Continental Army would deliberately aim for enemy officers; something which was deplored as scandalous by George III's Royal Army as that was not how wars were fought between "gentleman" in those times. Moreover, writes Chernow later of Washington, by then POTUS1: "As always, he touted military preparedness as the best way to prevent war" .
• As president, Chernow reports,
Washington's catalog of accomplishments was simply breathtaking
• Regarding Trump's relations with NATO and Europe:
Washington hoped to win respectability from foreign powers, but he also wanted to stay free of foreign entanglements so the young nation could prosper. He gave Gouverneur Morris a succinct formulation of his credo:
"My primary objects … have been to preserve the country in peace, if I can, and to be prepared for war, if I cannot."
In general, he favored economic rather than political involvement with the outside world. This neutrality policy was practical in that the United States was too small to exert significant leverage among the great powers and high-minded enough to shy away from European balance-of-power politics. Washington had no desire to exploit wrangling among foreign states, telling Morris that
"this country is not guided by such narrow and mistaken policy as will lead it to wish the destruction of any nation under an idea that our importance will be increased in proportion as that of others is lessened."
As war convulsed Europe, Washington, a former war hero, might have been tempted to become a warlike president, but he wisely abjured the use of force at this first serious threat.
• Related to Washington's emphasis on prosperity which does seem to echo Trump's decision to focus on trade and economic relations: As president, George Washington had
a powerful message:
"The promotion of domestic manufactures will, in my conception, be among the first consequences which may naturally be expected to flow from an energetic government."
believed that "commercial connections, of all others, are the most
difficult to dissolve," which foreshadowed his faith as president in
enduring commercial rather than political ties with other countries.
• Indeed (in a passage forecasting the Civil War), the Southern planter that Washington was would eventually decide that because of the North's commitment to "finance, commerce, and even abolitionism", that was the path to follow.
[In 1795] Washington told Edmund Randolph that, if the Union were to break up into North and South,
"he had made up his mind to remove and be of the northern."
That [the Virginia planter] now identified with northern finance, commerce, and even abolitionism would have major consequences for American history. Had he sided with Jefferson and Madison, it might have deepened irrevocably the cleavage between North and South and opened an unbridgeable chasm seventy years before the Civil War
• Regarding how outraged allies feel scandalized by Trump: they don't realize to what extent that Trump feels — utterly — betrayed by them? Well, in order to see how Washington felt about his country's erstwhile allies during the Revolutionm let us turn the dial back 230 years or so:
On June 13 [1797 (p 782)] Washington sat under the portico of Mount Vernon with Polish nobleman Julian Niemcewicz and talked politics. As they savored breezes coming from the Potomac, Washington upbraided the French government with such "passionate wrath" that Niemcewicz was taken aback. The ex-president, protesting the plunder of American shipping and the unforgivable insults to American envoys, sounded warlike. "Submission is vile," Washington thundered, saying than rather see
"freedom and independence trodden under foot, [he would] pour out the last drop of blood which is yet in my veins."
• Do you think that the MAGA movement is going overboard, in what is after all called "a country of immigrants", as Donald Trump exaggerates the threat of foreign migrants (legal or otherwise)? Well, he is not the first — far from it — and the danger is not to be dismissed lightly. In 1797,
[former president George Washington] observed that resident aliens had entered the country "for the express purpose of poisoning the minds of our people," thereby estranging"their affections from the government of their choice" and "endeavoring to dissolve the Union"
• Have you heard about all the anger in the MAGA crowds against the Democrats — regularly accused of hatred for America and all things American, of unscupulous tactics, and of treason? Well, listen to what George Washington thought of Thomas Jefferson's party (then called the Democratic-Republican Party — as opposed to Washington's Federalists — and shortened to the Republicans):
Fiercely opinionated, even strident, Washington was now avowedly partisan in private, fulminating against the Republicans as pawns of the French in their attempt to manipulate American politics. As he told Thomas Pinckney, time would show the difference between those
"who are true Americans [and] those who are simulating a foreign nation to unfriendly acts, repugnant to our rights and dignity."
• In that perspective, it seems appropriate to end this post with Washington's famed farewell speech
In a paean to unity, he warned that national identity must trump local attachments.
"The name of AMERICAN, which belongs to you, in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism, more than any appellation derived from local discrimnations."
This continued perspective had informed his work ever since the Revolution. Washington stressed the need to safeguard western territories from foreign encroachments, and without mentioning the Whiskey Rebellion by name, he enunciated the need for law and order:
"The very idea of the power and the right of the people to establish government presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established government."
Instead of flattering the people, Washington challenged them to improve their performance as citizens. Most of all, he appealed to the Americans to cling to the Union, with the federal government as the true guarantor of liberty and independence. As Joseph Ellis has written, "In the Farewell Address, Washington reiterated his conviction that the centralizing impulses of the American Revolution were not violations but fulfillments of its original ethos."
On 17 October, the world saw France descend into chaos: rioters, looters and the black bloc took to the streets of Paris and other major French cities, burning buildings, sacking shops and desecrating monuments.
There have now been weeks of unrest in France. Throughout it all, Palestinian and Algerian flags have been waved all over the country. Some demonstrators have shouted slogans such as, ‘That’s for Palestine!’ and ‘Globalise the Intifada!’. Even Greta Thunberg has been on the scene, attending a school protest earlier this month wearing a keffiyeh.
In a strange sense, this is a huge success for Macron. After all, he decided to recognise a Palestinian state last year, unaware that Paris would become its capital.
… youth organisations from 12 European countries are calling for protests and strikes across Europe. They may not yet have succeeded in globalising the Intifada, but they are certainly Europeanising it.
What happened last weekend was a violent insurrection, a civil war in which only one side was attacking. For many years, the French police have not been authorised to properly defend themselves. Restrictions have been imposed on police officers for fear of a George Floyd-type incident. The rioters are well aware of this and are eager to take advantage.
… the government is busy restricting the freedoms of law-abiding citizens in order to avoid punishing the guilty: imposing curfews and increasing surveillance of social networks to anticipate thug violence.
After last weekend’s insurrection, fewer than 200 people slept in jail – one third of whom were foreign nationals, many others had foreign origins and some were even illegal immigrants. None of those appearing in court was given anything close to the maximum sentence for their crimes. The justice system goes easy on thugs and looters due to overcrowded prisons and the predominantly leftist ideology of most French judges.
… Meanwhile, the mainstream media have downplayed both the migrant background of the rioters and any Islamist element to the protests.
… In response to criticism from abroad, [the husband of Brigitte Macron] has called comments by foreign leaders – Trump among them – ‘as unacceptable as they are stupid’. He has even blamed AI-generated images and foreign influence for painting an overly bleak picture, insinuating that they originated from the US. The denialism feels wilful at this stage.
With his head planted firmly in the sand, the last six months of Macron’s presidency are going to be very long indeed.
As with every vote of note in the United States, our ol' friend Damian Bennett has again produced a series of election posters for the mid-terms of 2026, focusing on voter protection. One of them — UP-TO-DATE VOTER ROLLS — is reproduced above, check out the other two at his Behance page on GOTV 2026 Election Protection Posters: VOTER ID and PERSONAL USPO MAIL DROP. (GOTV posters from earlier election cycles can be found here and here andhere.) This Fall, the artist from Waverly, Virginia, adds the following comment:
If you are an American citizen and of legal age, you have the right to vote. This right requires government to give notice of elections; make polls accessible and open throughout the appointed day; maintain the integrity and completeness of voter rolls; record and count all legal votes; publish the results in a timely manner. What this right does not require is every possible personal convenience. Election protection helps prevent legal votes being cancelled by cheaters and elections being rigged by powerful interests. A protected vote requires some effort, but considerably less than applying for a gun permit or a day at the DMV.
I, like others, am perfectly willing to be stand corrected, even to be proven an alleged Islamophobe (in fact, that would be — by far — the best outcome), but when you see the comments made by Muslims in private as well as in public, you start to seriously wonder whether the likes of Larry Taunton and Ayaan Hirsi Ali haven't been proven right.
“I know I don’t belong here. That is why I’m destroying this country as much as I can, and sucking up all the benefits and tax money to the absolute max."
Pro-Palestinian activist in Sweden:
“I know I don’t belong here. That is why I’m destroying this country as much as I can, and sucking up all the benefits and tax money to the absolute max."
Remember, the entire purpose of the Palestinian movement is to advance the Islamic takeover of the West. These people absolutely hate you. https://t.co/cIrK7tnNEq
• Belgium: After hearing complaints about how a Brussels neighborhood has become unlivable because of the influx of Muslims with women's veils everywhere, a Muslim woman (Saliha Raïss) smugly responds "If it's so unlivable here, then get the hell out, move elsewhere," then breaking into giggles, the local politician adds "fuck off!" (Si à Molenbeek c’est si invivable, alors changez de bord quoi, allez-y ailleurs — Dégagez !) The Muslims stay, says Islam, the native Belgians can move away… Similarly, on the other side of the Atlantic, a Christian pastor in Dearborn was told by the Muslim mayor (Abdullah Hammoud) that he is "not welcome here," in… his own city. (Shookhran for the Instalinks, Ed and Sarah.)
• Canada: A Muslim immigrant to a Canadian reporter: "At some point [Sharia law] will [replace Canadian law]. …
Because we have families here, we are making babies, you are not. Your population is going down the slum …
One day we can have a Muslim majority nation here in Canada — right in your face! … We all owe our allegiance and our loyalty first and foremost to our religion." The gimmigrant added that on the day he was supposed, along with dozens or hundreds of other immigrants, to take the oath to Canada, he didn't speak, only mouthing the words.
Oregon politician Nafisa Fai just held a rally in MN, speaking Somali, with an American flag UPSIDE DOWN.
Enough with the pretending already.
These are not Americans. https://t.co/UwBbhxOn1h
• Denmark (personal testimony) — "I'LL F*CK YOUR MOTHER!" In 2025 I am driving in the left lane of on one of the largest roads in Copenhagen (H C Andersens Boulevard, three lanes, occasionally four), quite deserted at this time in the evening, and signal the slower car ahead to kindly pull over by flashing my lights, so that I can pass the vehicle. For five minutes the driver refuses, then finally relents. As I pass him, his window is down, and he has quite a dark complexion and he is looking at me darkly. I shout in Danish, in as neutral tone as I can muster: "What is your problem? What took you so long?" He looks furious. He first shouts back that he is observing the speed limit, although he was actually below it. Then: "Jeg f*cker din mor!" he shouts back.
For those who don't understand Danish (although the verb has been obviously taken from a more wide-spread language), He will "f*ck" my mother. Whaaatt?! Where did that come from?! The intent and subtext are quite clear: It is not a "cunning" seduction threat — à la Dangerous Liaisons. No; I will fuck your mother — whether she wants to or not. Besides the fact that this apparent Muslim is insulted — offended — over an entirely trivial trifle, the would-be motherf*cker (literally speaking, not necessarily an insult in this case) finds that a reasonable reaction is to punish me, and that by raping the one female family member who has been closest to me (not to mention to my father) for all my life. Let me ask you a question: What is this if not a threat to inflict the deepest type of humiliation and shame on all of us (myself, my parents, our neighbors, etc…) and but an example of the age-old tradition of dhimmitude?)
“We want more immigrants to come into your countries and then they’re gonna fuck your sisters and then your daughters. … We're here to destroy the White Race, bitch!"
How about this one? Is the Democrat Party ok with this?
• Britain, Germany, Spain, the rest of Europe — the élites' message is: we bring in hundreds of thousands, millions of foreigners — mainly Western-hating Muslims all of whom are dead set against multicultiralism — to defeat the real enemy: the right-leaning individuals among our populations. Likewise blinded to any problematics associated with Islam, Pedro
Sánchez (following in the footsteps of Tony Blair and Angela Merkel and duly lionized in
the New York Times for being fiercely anti-Trump), follows through, while one of his party's close allies bellows:
“We have obtained papers and regularization. And now we are
going to go for citizenship or change the law so that they can vote, of
course. Hopefully, replacement theory, hopefully we can rid this country
of fascists and racists with migrants, with working people.”
If you had told any New Yorker in 2001 that the city — and the Isalamic Republic of New York — would be governed by a Muslim mayor who speaks at mosques filled with people who vow to destroy the West, they would deny that it could be possible
… we have another luminary in this new radical extremist movement, Abdul El-Sayed. He’s running now. He won the nomination in the Michigan senatorial race. He will be running against Mike Rogers for the Senate. He said … before that he follows Sharia law. He was caught in a hot mic saying that we should not celebrate the death of the supreme leader, [Ali] Khamenei, in Iran.
Remember, [the ayatollah] had just ordered 40,000 of his own people to be slaughtered, that were protesting. And [el-Sayed] said, “My constituents wouldn’t like that.” In other words, his constituents, which he’s proud of, were on the side of the Iranian theocracy that for 50 years has been the chief sponsor of terror in the world.
These drama queens hate
you, they hate America, and they mock any suffering you suffer — while
going ballistic over any individual in a minority group they have
decided to anoint as a member of the oppressed.
• Nine years ago (and eight years before Mamdani's aunt's nephew became mayor of New York), Front Page Magazine printed an article by Benny Huang, who spoke about the "this-criminal's-motive-is-unknown" media:
Each time a Muslim
terror attack occurs, journalists attempt to lead the public through
what can only be called a coping ritual. The ritual has four stages.
The first of these is the “let’s not jump to conclusions” stage in
which reporters take great pains not to assume that the attacker is a
Muslim just because his name happens to be Abdul or Muhammad or even
because he yelled “Allahu Akbar”
moments before his killing spree began. Then, when it turns out that he
is a Muslim, reporters wonder if his religious affiliation might have
been incidental to the attack—which it rarely ever is.
In the second
stage, the shortest of the four, reporters actually acknowledge the
attack and its motive before quickly moving on to the third stage. I’ll
call this the “Muslims fear backlash”
stage, and it’s characterized by stories about hijab-snatchings (that
usually turn out to be hoaxes) or Muslims getting dirty looks in the
street. It isn’t even necessary to find any actual incidents of backlash
after an attack because the fear of a backlash, not the backlash
itself, is the real story. The fourth and final stage is when reporters begin to ask how the right-wing might “exploit” the story. This serves as a warning
that taking action to stave off civilizational demise is somehow letting
the terrorists win.
• Somalia — not content with "some people did something", Ilhan Omar refers to World War Eleven. She has so little interest in "her" new country — and it's civilization, and its history, and its past — that she does not know the defining war of the 20th century and can't even tell the number of (world) wars her new country and/or the world has engaged in.
How many world wars were there? WW Two? WW Eleven? WW XXII? WW 33? And how tragic was each one? How appalling were the fatalities? That is an issue in which Ilhan Omar has zero interest.
This man caught these immigrants dumping trash into a stream in Central Park in NYC!
This is how they live in their home countries and see nothing wrong with it!
We don't live this way!
They show no respect for our culture!
GO BACK HOME! https://t.co/f4Ntae2RZX
• Meeting up with the two other most famous Muslim politicians in America, Rebecca Tlaib beams with pride as she tells fellow Muslim VIPs such as Ilhan Omar and Abdul el-Sayed "Since we [Ilhan and I] got elected in 2019, 200 Muslims got elected throughout the country." As she adds comments to the effect how oppressed Muslims allegedly are/were — "It's got a lot of people strength to be unapologetically themselves, and really lean in in who they are" + now us Muslims "are in every corner of the United States", you "motherfuckers" — nobody in the group displays an iota of gratitude whatsoever towards the United States (just like in Uruguay), no mention of "What a great country!" where this advancement was possible, no contrast whatsoever with the Muslim world where such advances are unheard of, or no declaration that maybe the Arab/Muslim world could learn something from America/the West. (If, as I did, you google "video Rashida Tlaib 200 muslims", you get almost no media sources; just about every one of the initial list is from a conservative's Facebook page.)
The example of the Muslim members of the Squad have been plain:
they show no gratitude towards America and no attachment to anything other than the culture in the regions that they came from (and which, for that matter, said
cultures ruined). More than that: Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib
are Hamas (i.e., terrorism) sympathizers who have no inclination (in
any matter, on any issue) to seeing, or even acknowledging, the other
side's viewpoints — in truth, these drama queens are literally incapable of doing so — but demonstrate nothing but rage and hysteria as their co-religionists in this death cult march down the streets shouting Long live 7 October. Ann Coulter has a query:
Question: Why are we importing millions of people from lesser
cultures who will inevitably despise and resent the West for its very
success?
… This is an endemic problem. Israel can't do much about the
neighborhood, but why on Earth is the U.S. importing preposterous
foreigners from third-rate cultures? The failure of their ancestors to
create anything worthwhile, certainly compared to the stupendous
accomplishments of the West, is too glaringly obvious. Inviting millions
upon millions of them here, to gawk at our magnificent civilization, is
a guarantee of perpetual strife and resentment.
It could never work. It was always an insane idea.
Instead
of trampling on the free speech rights of people who hate the West, how
about avoiding the problem altogether by leaving them where they are?
They'll like it! Vastly fewer "white supremacists" to oppress them.
would like to reflect on these three sometimes-forgotten American virtues—honor, tradition, and optimism …
Honor
… Without such individual vows of honesty and compassion for others, civilization in aggregate cannot be sustained. It instead descends into the age-old banes of tribalism, disunity, and chaos. …
Tradition
… without traditional reverence for the past, an ungrateful nation not only suffers a loss of knowledge but is plagued by hubris—so often the twin of ignorance—believing that it alone has discovered ideas and behaviors unique to itself and its own era, when they are in fact ancient. This closed mindset seeks a kind of perfection, a heaven on earth, instead of the good—and it ends up obtaining neither.
Are we not instead the sum total of all those who came before us, who for the most part here in America left us a constitutional system and infrastructure that allowed us to start our lives both materially and civically, in terms of freedom, far ahead of those in the past and those elsewhere today? …
Optimism
… Your generation is now witness to a counterrevolution of sorts. Millions of Americans are asking for a reexamination of our culture and society with an eye to restoring ancient decency and looking to the good of past generations. Critical to this restoration is your optimism. Such positivity is the child of gratitude for all that we have inherited and all that we wish to enhance and pass on to others not yet born.
“As a Muslim, my life’s mission is to fight the US Government, US Army, and ICE until my last breath… the reason for my existence.”
🚨THIS 👇🏻 is the EVIL we are facing.
In Brooklyn, NY, Dir. of the Muslim American Society, Mohammad Badaway says,
“As a Muslim, my life’s mission is to fight the US Government, US Army and ICE until my last breath…. the reason for my existence.” https://t.co/Rn7ZHYctvl
As is also the case in Western Europe, assimilation is demonstrably rare in U.S. municipalities with heavy concentrations of Muslim migrants. In these areas, large influxes of Muslims from abroad have changed not only the complexion, culture, values and traditions of cities, but also the demographic makeup of city councils, school boards, police departments and courts.
… “Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our community, it is not to assimilate,” asserted Linda Sarsour, a renowned Palestinian activist who lives in the Paterson area and has helped transform the city.
these scenes we keep seeing of Muslims praying in the streets of the West are intentional.
They serve to assert dominance, normalize Islam in the public square, seize ground, and demand exceptional treatment that immediately turns into claimed rights.
Bad-faith acts like this are signals of the same project that turned many cities in Europe into shitholes.
Exceptional threats demand exceptional measures.
Islam must be banned in the West because it is not a religion; it is a hostile political ideology.
When the Muslim population in a country is less than 2%, they are a peace-loving minority that poses no threat to other ethnic groups. United States 1.1%, China 1.8% for example.
When the Muslim population is 2-5%, they begin to push for government authorization to enforce Islamic law in Muslim enclaves, recruiting new members from prisons and the streets, with disturbances occurring in Muslim enclaves. Such countries include: Australia 3.2%, Canada 4.9%, Italy 4.8%.
Denmark 5.4%, Germany 6.7%, United Kingdom 6%, Spain 5.3%, Thailand 5.4%. When the Muslim population reaches 5-10%, major disturbances erupt in Muslim enclaves; they advocate for the introduction of halal foods, ensuring that halal food practitioners are Muslims; they pressure chain supermarkets to label shelves with halal certifications, threatening those who refuse to comply. Such countries include: Denmark 5.4%, Germany 6.7%, United Kingdom 6%, Spain 5.3%, Thailand 5.4%, Philippines 5%, Sweden 7.1%, Switzerland 5.9%, Netherlands 5.5%.
When the Muslim population approaches 10-20%, nationwide riots occur; Muslims issue a series of demands, such as building large mosques in enclaves, granting super-national and super-legal privileges, forcing non-Muslims to follow Muslim customs, and criminalizing "expressions of dissatisfaction with Islam." Such countries include: France 10.8%, India 14.6%, Israel 18.4%, Russia 13%.
When the Muslim population is 20-60%, jihadist militants sporadically massacre non-believers, burning down Christian and Jewish places of worship; other ethnic groups either convert to Islam out of fear of being killed or are killed by Muslims; the country experiences massacres and ongoing terrorist attacks. Such countries include: Ethiopia 33%, Bosnia 50.7%, Chad 55%.
When the Muslim population reaches 60-80%, Islamic law replaces secular law, establishing a theocratic regime that persecutes all other non-believers in the name of the state, massacres Christians, and imposes taxes on non-believers using Islamic law as a weapon. Such countries include: Lebanon 67.8, Albania 60%, Malaysia 63%, Qatar 77.5% (Qatari citizen 100%).
When the Muslim population is 80%-98%, the country lives in daily intimidation, violence, and jihad, carrying out ethnic cleansing and massacres, with the state expelling non-believers. Such countries include: Sudan 96.6%, Bangladesh 90%, Egypt 93%, Indonesia 87%, Iraq 99.6%, Pakistan 97%, Palestine 98%, Syria 90%, Turkey 94%.
When the Muslim population is 98 to 100%, the Islamic people welcome the "House of Islamic Peace." In theory, this should be a time of peace, as everyone is Muslim, living in harmony without internal strife—but in reality, it is nothing like that; peace is not achieved, because in 100% purely Islamic countries, Muslim groups of different sects attack each other, vie to become the leaders of domestic Islamic law, and seek to eliminate other Muslim factions for all sorts of reasons. Such countries include: When the Muslim population is 80%-99%, the country lives in daily intimidation, violence, and jihad, carrying out ethnic cleansing and massacres, with the state expelling non-believers. Such countries include: , Afghanistan 100%, Somalia 99.6%, Yemen 100%. Maldives 99%, Mauritania 99.6%, Morocco 99%, Niger 98.2%, Iran 99.5%
are the people coming to take your inheritance from you. Coming from a “might makes right” world, they know no other policy. They have no vested interest in preserving American law or culture, and that is because it isn’t their heritage and they don’t understand it.
Democrats seem to think they will be immune from all of this because they foolishly believe these newcomers will view them as benefactors. They do not. I’ve met them, been in their cardboard camps, walk with them on trails, heard their hopes and dreams, and in none of it is there such nuanced thinking. America is, for them, a ripe fruit theirs for the taking.
Once you open the castle gates and lower the drawbridge, you no longer control the outcome. Indeed, you have surrendered it. And why are Democrats willing to do that? Because they hate Americans more than this still ill-defined rabble, and they don’t understand what’s coming. These people are tougher than you, and they don’t give a damn about you.
The Immigration Crisis that Will Destroy the West
The full documentary is now available 👇
I was pleased to take part and explain mass immigration's devastating effect on parts of London & the UK
Let this be a warning to the USA, Canada, Australia & NZ
Also on YouTube
