Saturday, October 31, 2026

ELECTION DAY OF THE DEAD: A protected vote requires some effort


ELECTION DAY OF THE DEAD

As with every vote of note in the United States, our ol' friend Damian Bennett has again produced a series of election posters for the mid-terms of 2026, focusing on voter protection. One of them — UP-TO-DATE VOTER ROLLS — is reproduced above, check out the other two at his Behance page on GOTV 2026 Election Protection Posters: VOTER ID and PERSONAL USPO MAIL DROP. (GOTV posters from earlier election cycles can be found here and here and here.) This Fall, the artist from Waverly, Virginia, adds the following comment: 

If you are an American citizen and of legal age, you have the right to vote. This right requires government to give notice of elections; make polls accessible and open throughout the appointed day; maintain the integrity and completeness of voter rolls; record and count all legal votes; publish the results in a timely manner. What this right does not require is every possible personal convenience. Election protection helps prevent legal votes being cancelled by cheaters and elections being rigged by powerful interests. A protected vote requires some effort, but considerably less than applying for a gun permit or a day at the DMV. 

Posted by at No comments:

Thursday, October 29, 2026

A Trojan Horse? What Nobody Tells You About Muslim Gimmigrants and the Islamic Caliphate: “Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our community, it is not to assimilate”


As the results in Sweden's super-close election ("Open borders stopped the right from winning": "This could be the first election where the Muslim immigration community decides the outcome") show distasteful truths about both the Muslim immigrant wave and the Western countries' respective native leftist contingents, it's important to take into consideration that the vast majority of the former should perhaps be called Gimmigrants (not they alone; as should illegal aliens from Latin America and other places defined as the Third World).

I, like others, am perfectly willing to be stand corrected, even to be proven an alleged Islamophobe (in fact, that would be — by far — the best outcome), but when you see the comments made by Muslims in private as well as in public, you start to seriously wonder whether the likes of Larry Taunton and Ayaan Hirsi Ali haven't been proven right.

SPEAKING OF WHICH: Questions to the Leftists (still evergreen 7 years later) — If Immigrants Are Such Paragons of Virtue, Why Not Support Sending Them Home to Their Countries to Become Productive Citizens Who Help Build Up Their Respective Nations?!

In Sweden, justement, one pro-Palestinian Gimmegrant says that 

“I know I don’t belong here. That is why I’m destroying this country as much as I can, and sucking up all the benefits and tax money to the absolute max."

• Belgium: After hearing complaints about how a Brussels neighborhood has become unlivable because of the influx of Muslims with women's veils everywhere, a Muslim woman (Saliha Raïss) smugly responds "If it's so unlivable here, then get the hell out, move elsewhere," then breaking into giggles, the local politician adds "fuck off!" (Si à Molenbeek c’est si invivable, alors changez de bord quoi, allez-y ailleurs — Dégagez !) The Muslims stay, says Islam, the native Belgians can move away… Similarly, on the other side of the Atlantic, a Christian pastor in Dearborn was told by the Muslim mayor (Abdullah Hammoud) that he is "not welcome here," in… his own city.


• Canada: A Muslim immigrant to a Canadian reporter: "At some point [Sharia law] will [replace Canadian law]. … Because we have families here, we are making babies, you are not. Your population is going down the slum … One day we can have a Muslim majority nation here in Canada — right in your face! … We all owe our allegiance and our loyalty first and foremost to our religion." The gimmigrant added that on the day he was supposed, along with dozens or hundreds of other immigrants, to take the oath to Canada, he didn't speak, only mouthing the words.

• Britain — The vast amount of Muslim politicians elected to town and other local seats seem to show little to no interest in local politics (just like in Michigan a candidate like Abdul cares more about the West Bank than West Detroit), like repairing roads and making other improvements to their towns; the only thing, or the main thing, that interests them is Israel and the Middle East, along with all things Islamic, something that was seen years ago in Lebanon… In London, meanwhile, the Muslim mayor announced that, in partnership with the Church of England, St Paul's Cathedral would be turned into a nightclub with DJs for a night or two ("Would Sadiq Khan back a rave in a mosque?" asked Douglas Murray in the Spectator). While Labour's Home secretary (Shabana Mahmood happens to be a… devout Muslim) has called for inviting even more immigrants into the country, signs in held in Islamic demonstrations read "Shariah; the Solution for UK" while the entire crowd chants "UK GO TO HELL!" Elsewhere, their co-religionists were filmed setting fire to a UK flag while shouting: "This is our country now! Allahu Akbar!" (And no, I do not recall any of the above being chastised by the aforementioned local Muslim politicians.) How long before the Islamic takeover leads to them banning the English and British flags?

• In Columbus, Ohio, there is a taxpayer funded charter school for Muslims where students are taught "that non-Muslims go to hell and their purpose is to spread Islam in America" public K–8 charter school is called Focus Learning Academy of Northern Columbus, the students are "overwhelmingly Somali", and "taxpayers are paying $10,435,836 PER YEAR for this school to operate." Speaking of which, Muslim politicians are known to have held rallies with the Stars & Stripes upside down — as have even their left-leaning Western allies in the America-hating Democrat party.

• Britain & Spain — As The Guardian Hisses that Dogs Are An ‘Insidious’ Climate Threat and as the UK Mulls Banning 67 Dog Breeds for ‘Animal Health’, the suspicion arises that the country's politicians are willing to sacrifice age-old English traditions simply to appease the country’s growing and restive Muslim population (who (in)famously consider all dogs filthy animals). Meanwhile, when they were apprised of horrifying images of Muslim migrants who had invaded the Spanish North African territory of Ceuta killing a baby dolphin, Spanish leftists did not simply refrain from reacting (couldn't they simply have ignored the issue?), they had to rally to the Muslims' defense. Compare with Abdul el-Sayed in the USA who — besides doubling as a Consultant for Health Nonprofit led by a 'Scam Artist' Accused of 'Exploiting Medicare' and being part of a family with documented ties to the Muslim Brotherhood — turns out to have, in his capacity as Detroit health director overseeing Detroit Animal Control for about 16 months, taken full advantage of his position to have had more than 4,000 dogs and cats euthanized.
• We keep hearing about the regular Muslim who is moderate in his devotion to the "religion of peace." As P J O'Rourke wrote in the 1990s: The average Muslim is no fanatic, indeed he is the nicest of fellows. That is, until someone drops a Quran down his pants. Then he goes berserk. Here's the deal: all kinds of nice Muslims have settled in the West and earn an honest living, we are told (that is, if they are not on social assistance). However, correct me if I am mistaken: they keep to themselves — fine, even understandable — and display little interest (see more details below) for the new culture around them or for the people they live amongst. Aren't there numerous stories of when these friendly neighbors find themselves in the majority, the moderates become Jihadis (or allies of the Jihadis) and turn on their non-Muslim friends, and betray them in the most horrid of ways?

• Denmark (personal testimony) — "I'LL F*CK YOUR MOTHER!" 
In 2025 I am driving in the left lane of on one of the largest roads in Copenhagen (H C Andersens Boulevard, three lanes, occasionally four), quite deserted at this time in the evening, and signal the slower car ahead to kindly pull over by flashing my lights, so that I can pass the vehicle. For five minutes the driver refuses, then finally relents. As I pass him, his window is down, and he has quite a dark complexion and he is looking at me darkly. I shout in Danish, in as neutral tone as I can muster: "What is your problem? What took you so long?" He looks furious. He first shouts back that he is observing the speed limit, although he was actually below it. Then: "Jeg f*cker din mor!" he shouts back. 

For those who don't understand Danish (although the verb has been obviously taken from a more wide-spread language), He will "f*ck" my mother. Whaaatt?! Where did that come from?! The intent and subtext are quite clear: It is not a "cunning" seduction threat — à la Dangerous Liaisons. No; I will fuck your mother — whether she wants to or not. Besides the fact that this apparent Muslim is insulted — offended — over an entirely trivial trifle, the would-be motherf*cker (literally speaking, not necessarily an insult in this case) finds that a reasonable reaction is to punish me, and that by raping the one female family member who has been closest to me (not to mention to my father) for all my life. Let me ask you a question: What is this if not a threat to inflict the deepest type of humiliation and shame on all of us (myself, my parents, our neighbors, etc…) and but an example of the age-old tradition of dhimmitude?) 

Related: Speaking on the subject of rape, a video of Hasan Piker has surfaced in which he states that

“We want more immigrants to come into your countries and then they’re gonna fuck your sisters and then your daughters. … We're here to destroy the White Race, bitch!"

• Britain, Germany, Spain, the rest of Europe — the élites' message is: we bring in hundreds of thousands, millions of foreigners — mainly Western-hating Muslims all of whom are dead set against multicultiralism — to defeat the real enemy: the right-leaning individuals among our populations. Likewise blinded to any problematics associated with Islam, Pedro Sánchez (following in the footsteps of Tony Blair and Angela Merkel and duly lionized in the New York Times for being fiercely anti-Trump), follows through, while one of his party's close allies bellows:

“We have obtained papers and regularization. And now we are going to go for citizenship or change the law so that they can vote, of course. Hopefully, replacement theory, hopefully we can rid this country of fascists and racists with migrants, with working people.”  

• USA: At the 25th anniversary of the 911 attacks, Mamdani and AOC laughed it up at 9/11 Memorial As Names of the Victims Read. As David Strom puts it, 
If you had told any New Yorker in 2001 that the city — and the Isalamic Republic of New York — would be governed by a Muslim mayor who speaks at mosques filled with people who vow to destroy the West, they would deny that it could be possible 
Never forget.

As for the camaraderie of Mamdani (hasn't he proven himself to be a liar?) with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (whose DSA says that ‘Our Goal Is Communism’), what does it prove if not that we need to Get Ready for the Democrats’ Season of Bloodthirst since — just like the Muslims — (as Victor Davis Hanson puts it) The Radical Left Wants to Destroy America and Rebuild It?

 … we have another luminary in this new radical extremist movement, Abdul El-Sayed. He’s running now. He won the nomination in the Michigan senatorial race. He will be running against Mike Rogers for the Senate. He said … before that he follows Sharia law. He was caught in a hot mic saying that we should not celebrate the death of the supreme leader, [Ali] Khamenei, in Iran. 

Remember, [the ayatollah] had just ordered 40,000 of his own people to be slaughtered, that were protesting. And [el-Sayed] said, “My constituents wouldn’t like that.” In other words, his constituents, which he’s proud of, were on the side of the Iranian theocracy that for 50 years has been the chief sponsor of terror in the world. 

• Notice the rage by a Mao-admirer (80 million dead) and a 9-11 celebrator (3,000 dead) who prominently framed a front page of the following day's New York Times on a wall in his home: half a dozen years ago, Hasan Piker bellowed "Kill them! Kill those motherfuckers and murder those motherfuckers in the streets! Let the streets — Let the streets soak in their fucking red capitalist blood, dude!" No, it's not Muslims alone, t'is also their Western allies on the left. See my post on The Democrats' Rage: These People Are Drama Queens Who Hate Your Guts and Mock Your Dead: 
These drama queens hate you, they hate America, and they mock any suffering you suffer — while going ballistic over any individual in a minority group they have decided to anoint as a member of the oppressed.

 • Nine years ago (and eight years before Mamdani's aunt's nephew became mayor of New York), Front Page Magazine printed an article by Benny Huang, who spoke about the "this-criminal's-motive-is-unknown" media:

Each time a Muslim terror attack occurs, journalists attempt to lead the public through what can only be called a coping ritual. The ritual has four stages.
  
The first of these is the “let’s not jump to conclusions” stage in which reporters take great pains not to assume that the attacker is a Muslim just because his name happens to be Abdul or Muhammad or even because he yelled “Allahu Akbar” moments before his killing spree began. Then, when it turns out that he is a Muslim, reporters wonder if his religious affiliation might have been incidental to the attack—which it rarely ever is. 

In the second stage, the shortest of the four, reporters actually acknowledge the attack and its motive before quickly moving on to the third stage. I’ll call this the “Muslims fear backlash” stage, and it’s characterized by stories about hijab-snatchings (that usually turn out to be hoaxes) or Muslims getting dirty looks in the street. It isn’t even necessary to find any actual incidents of backlash after an attack because the fear of a backlash, not the backlash itself, is the real story. The fourth and final stage is when reporters begin to ask how the right-wing might “exploit” the story. This serves as a warning that taking action to stave off civilizational demise is somehow letting the terrorists win.  

• Somalia — not content with "some people did something", Ilhan Omar refers to World War Eleven. She has so little interest in "her" new country — and it's civilization, and its history, and its past — that she does not know the defining war of the 20th century and can't even tell the number of (world) wars her new country and/or the world has engaged in. How many world wars were there? WW Two? WW Eleven? WW XXII? WW 33? And how tragic was each one? How appalling were the fatalities? That is an issue in which Ilhan Omar has zero interest. 

• Like their congresswoman — for whom "our president" is neither Trump nor Biden but Somalia's in Mogadishu — Somali immigrants do not seem to have an once of gratitude (or respect or attachment) to their new country — or to its people; with whom few seem to interact. Half of the people best known for piracy off their African coasts are on welfare, and the rest of the Gimmigrants seem — duly enabled by the state's (greedy) leftists — to be involved in fraud and elaborate scams. At a British school in Manchester, Sudanese migrants sing not God Save the King but the national anthem of Sudan.

• Meeting up with the two other most famous Muslim politicians in America, Rebecca Tlaib beams with pride as she tells fellow Muslim VIPs such as Ilhan Omar and Abdul el-Sayed "Since we [Ilhan and I] got elected in 2019, 200 Muslims got elected throughout the country." As she adds comments to the effect how oppressed Muslims allegedly are/were — "It's got a lot of people strength to be unapologetically themselves, and really lean in in who they are" + now us Muslims "are in every corner of the United States", you "motherfuckers" — nobody in the group displays an iota of gratitude whatsoever towards the United States (just like in Uruguay), no mention of "What a great country!" where this advancement was possible, no contrast whatsoever with the Muslim world where such advances are unheard of, or no declaration that maybe the Arab/Muslim world could learn something from America/the West. (If, as I did, you google "video Rashida Tlaib 200 muslims", you get almost no media sources; just about every one of the initial list is from a conservative's Facebook page.)

Incidentally, Daniel Pipes is curious: Is it not strange that migrants from Syria and Iraq move to places like Germany and Sweden instead of to neighbors like Saudi Arabia and Kuwait?

The example of the Muslim members of the Squad have been plain: they show no gratitude towards America and no attachment to anything other than the culture in the regions that they came from (and which, for that matter, said cultures ruined). More than that: Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib are Hamas (i.e., terrorism) sympathizers who have no inclination (in any matter, on any issue) to seeing, or even acknowledging, the other side's viewpoints — in truth, these drama queens are literally incapable of doing so — but demonstrate nothing but rage and hysteria as their co-religionists in this death cult march down the streets shouting Long live 7 October. Ann Coulter has a query:

Question: Why are we importing millions of people from lesser cultures who will inevitably despise and resent the West for its very success?

 … This is an endemic problem. Israel can't do much about the neighborhood, but why on Earth is the U.S. importing preposterous foreigners from third-rate cultures? The failure of their ancestors to create anything worthwhile, certainly compared to the stupendous accomplishments of the West, is too glaringly obvious. Inviting millions upon millions of them here, to gawk at our magnificent civilization, is a guarantee of perpetual strife and resentment.

It could never work. It was always an insane idea.

Instead of trampling on the free speech rights of people who hate the West, how about avoiding the problem altogether by leaving them where they are? They'll like it! Vastly fewer "white supremacists" to oppress them.

So when the Muslim Brotherhood has a primary mission and secret plans to "sabotage Western civilization from within" with what they call civilizational jihad, authorizing $140M annually to help Muslims take control of American government — not to mention how much more for various European countries — with the proceeds coming from "tithing (zakat) from American [!!] Muslims to finance the campaigns of Muslim leaders for public office", then I react as follows: I'm sorry for being skeptical, but I don't really trust any Muslim gimmigrant for being in any way favorable to America, the West, and democracy, while being in any way opposed to the Islamic Caliphate.

In his 2025 Commencement Address at Hillsdale, Victor Davis Hanson stated that he 

would like to reflect on these three sometimes-forgotten American virtues—honor, tradition, and optimism …

Honor

 … Without such individual vows of honesty and compassion for others, civilization in aggregate cannot be sustained. It instead descends into the age-old banes of tribalism, disunity, and chaos. …

Tradition

 … without traditional reverence for the past, an ungrateful nation not only suffers a loss of knowledge but is plagued by hubris—so often the twin of ignorance—believing that it alone has discovered ideas and behaviors unique to itself and its own era, when they are in fact ancient. This closed mindset seeks a kind of perfection, a heaven on earth, instead of the good—and it ends up obtaining neither.

Are we not instead the sum total of all those who came before us, who for the most part here in America left us a constitutional system and infrastructure that allowed us to start our lives both materially and civically, in terms of freedom, far ahead of those in the past and those elsewhere today? …

Optimism

 … Your generation is now witness to a counterrevolution of sorts. Millions of Americans are asking for a reexamination of our culture and society with an eye to restoring ancient decency and looking to the good of past generations. Critical to this restoration is your optimism. Such positivity is the child of gratitude for all that we have inherited and all that we wish to enhance and pass on to others not yet born.

I'm sorry — and, again, by all means, correct me if I am wrong — I don't see that (ungrateful?) Muslims share, throughout their long history, and their prayers based on the Koran (when it is not a version that is sanitized), those three attitudes with anybody in the United States, or in the West (unless, possibly, it is people of the same faith), with whose Western inhabitants it is frankly hard to see, as Charlie Kirk put it, their being in any way compatible. As the Brooklyn Director of the Muslim American Society, Mohammad Badaway, states it, 

“As a Muslim, my life’s mission is to fight the US Government, US Army, and ICE until my last breath… the reason for my existence.”

As Raymond Ibrahim explains about the founding of the religion (as compared to the other major faiths), "the history and the doctrine of Islam", which is "openly [and] unequivocally hostile" to Western civilization and has always contained "that kernel of animosity for Christians and so-called infidels", with the conquest of Europe having always been "one of the great plans that went on for century after century."

• USA, Dearborn, and its political landscape: Turning US Cities Into ‘Beachheads’ for Islam by Paul Sperry at RealClear Investigations:

As is also the case in Western Europe, assimilation is demonstrably rare in U.S. municipalities with heavy concentrations of Muslim migrants. In these areas, large influxes of Muslims from abroad have changed not only the complexion, culture, values and traditions of cities, but also the demographic makeup of city councils, school boards, police departments and courts. 

 … “Our number one and top priority is to protect and defend our community, it is not to assimilate,” asserted Linda Sarsour, a renowned Palestinian activist who lives in the Paterson area and has helped transform the city.  

In that perspective, note that the niqab and the prayer mat turn out to be street theatre, Dan Burmawi is quoted as denying the term Islamophobic at Quotola while saying:

these scenes we keep seeing of Muslims praying in the streets of the West are intentional.

They serve to assert dominance, normalize Islam in the public square, seize ground, and demand exceptional treatment that immediately turns into claimed rights.

Bad-faith acts like this are signals of the same project that turned many cities in Europe into shitholes.

Exceptional threats demand exceptional measures.

Islam must be banned in the West because it is not a religion; it is a hostile political ideology.

The fact that Islam has two faces is Why We Cannot Treat Islam As ‘Just Another’ Religion … A religion that claims authority over law and politics should meet a higher test before it receives public privilege, says Gillian Dymond at Right Times.


• With Muslim leaders speaking of Islam's "expansionist element" — "you have to fight them … because they are Jews and Christians" — doesn't all of this mean that every Western country could be importing a Trojan horse?! 

A Middle Easterner, Imtiaz Mahmood, explains how the process works:

When the Muslim population in a country is less than 2%, they are a peace-loving minority that poses no threat to other ethnic groups. United States 1.1%, China 1.8% for example. 

When the Muslim population is 2-5%, they begin to push for government authorization to enforce Islamic law in Muslim enclaves, recruiting new members from prisons and the streets, with disturbances occurring in Muslim enclaves. Such countries include: Australia 3.2%, Canada 4.9%, Italy 4.8%. 

Denmark 5.4%, Germany 6.7%, United Kingdom 6%, Spain 5.3%, Thailand 5.4%. When the Muslim population reaches 5-10%, major disturbances erupt in Muslim enclaves; they advocate for the introduction of halal foods, ensuring that halal food practitioners are Muslims; they pressure chain supermarkets to label shelves with halal certifications, threatening those who refuse to comply. Such countries include: Denmark 5.4%, Germany 6.7%, United Kingdom 6%, Spain 5.3%, Thailand 5.4%, Philippines 5%, Sweden 7.1%, Switzerland 5.9%, Netherlands 5.5%. 

When the Muslim population approaches 10-20%, nationwide riots occur; Muslims issue a series of demands, such as building large mosques in enclaves, granting super-national and super-legal privileges, forcing non-Muslims to follow Muslim customs, and criminalizing "expressions of dissatisfaction with Islam." Such countries include: France 10.8%, India 14.6%, Israel 18.4%, Russia 13%. When the Muslim population is 20-60%, jihadist militants sporadically massacre non-believers, burning down Christian and Jewish places of worship; other ethnic groups either convert to Islam out of fear of being killed or are killed by Muslims; the country experiences massacres and ongoing terrorist attacks. Such countries include: Ethiopia 33%, Bosnia 50.7%, Chad 55%. 

When the Muslim population reaches 60-80%, Islamic law replaces secular law, establishing a theocratic regime that persecutes all other non-believers in the name of the state, massacres Christians, and imposes taxes on non-believers using Islamic law as a weapon. Such countries include: Lebanon 67.8, Albania 60%, Malaysia 63%, Qatar 77.5% (Qatari citizen 100%). 

When the Muslim population is 80%-98%, the country lives in daily intimidation, violence, and jihad, carrying out ethnic cleansing and massacres, with the state expelling non-believers. Such countries include: Sudan 96.6%, Bangladesh 90%, Egypt 93%, Indonesia 87%, Iraq 99.6%, Pakistan 97%, Palestine 98%, Syria 90%, Turkey 94%. 

When the Muslim population is 98 to 100%, the Islamic people welcome the "House of Islamic Peace." In theory, this should be a time of peace, as everyone is Muslim, living in harmony without internal strife—but in reality, it is nothing like that; peace is not achieved, because in 100% purely Islamic countries, Muslim groups of different sects attack each other, vie to become the leaders of domestic Islamic law, and seek to eliminate other Muslim factions for all sorts of reasons. Such countries include: When the Muslim population is 80%-99%, the country lives in daily intimidation, violence, and jihad, carrying out ethnic cleansing and massacres, with the state expelling non-believers. Such countries include: , Afghanistan 100%, Somalia 99.6%, Yemen 100%. Maldives 99%, Mauritania 99.6%, Morocco 99%, Niger 98.2%, Iran 99.5% 


Check out the Nick Freitas documentary, The Immigration Crisis that Will Destroy the West.

As Larry Alex Taunton explains, these Gimmigrants

are the people coming to take your inheritance from you. Coming from a “might makes right” world, they know no other policy. They have no vested interest in preserving American law or culture, and that is because it isn’t their heritage and they don’t understand it. 

Democrats seem to think they will be immune from all of this because they foolishly believe these newcomers will view them as benefactors. They do not. I’ve met them, been in their cardboard camps, walk with them on trails, heard their hopes and dreams, and in none of it is there such nuanced thinking. America is, for them, a ripe fruit theirs for the taking. 

Once you open the castle gates and lower the drawbridge, you no longer control the outcome. Indeed, you have surrendered it. And why are Democrats willing to do that? Because they hate Americans more than this still ill-defined rabble, and they don’t understand what’s coming. These people are tougher than you, and they don’t give a damn about you.

A question that arises is: Isn't it time to say The West has had enough?

Posted by at 1 comment:

Wednesday, October 28, 2026

America's Mid-Terms: There’s More That Unites Dems Than Differentiates — The conversations focus exclusively on how they’re going to use power to take revenge on their political enemies


From the green hills of Virginia, Damian Bennett provides a fair warning: He is giving us an overlong list, but "it is overlong with a purpose." And what Duncan Hill calls "the sheer volume of offenses by the Dems" turns out to be good news; our old buddy is convinced that the mindset that the president's party will lose the mid-term elections is fatally flawed.
From the moment DJT took office in January 2025, the DNC and media propagandists panelists immediately reframed the political chatter as, 'When the Democrats take power in 2026...' as a fact waiting only on the calendar. This is premised on the historical midterm headwinds that blow cold on the party in power. History and Blue tsunami wishcasting has created a mindset of inevitability. People, Red and Blue, have convinced themselves, contrary to the evidence (below), that the Democrats will take both the Senate and the House. This [presentation] disputes the mindset (and glee/gloom, respective) and argues a unique combination of factors run counter to the historical presumption.  

A recent ¡NP! post asks, Is Donald Trump in Danger of Being the Victim of the Churchill Effect?

Alas, the ensuant discussion is in French and therefore beyond me, but I take issue with the proposition itself as an apples-to-oranges misconstrual. 

Some history. Britain's coalition government broke up in May 1945 with elections held in July. Labour had been steadily gaining on the Tories since 1942. Though widely respected, Churchill was associated with four years of war and deprivation. The Tories misread the disconnect and, thinking to capitalize on Churchill's war-time popularity, ran under the more-of-the-same slogan, "Help him finish the job" (the Allies were still at war with Japan). But the British public was tired of war and job-finishing (that's for the Yanks) and was champing for some free stuff. Labour was ready with its Let Us Face the Future manifesto, a comprehensive wishlist of government goodies that matched the public appetite. Labour won in a landslide. That is NOT the American 2026 political situation.

Let me focus on the one glaring difference between the 1945 election and America's 2026 midterms -- what are the Democrats offering the electorate, what comprises their appealingly equivalent Labour manifesto?
How will the Democrats govern to lower gas & grocery prices, make housing more affordable, make good their Obamacare shambles, reduce the deficit? I have culled below the plan specifics that escaped Rep. Debbie:
Impeachments. Lawfare. That's it. No Clement Atlee here. 

I've no gift for election predictions but I can fit puzzle pieces together to form a picture puzzle, and I DO NOT see the Democrats riding a big Blue Tsunami into November. In brief, five reasons: 

1. Agenda & Messaging (see above).
Hon. Vickie Paladino (NYC Council Member District 19) On X October 24, 2026: None of the conversations taking place by Democrats and leftists in anticipation of retaking Congress are about the ways they’re going to make life more affordable for Americans. The conversations are exclusively about how they’re going to use power to take revenge on their political enemies. There is no strategy to lower gas prices or grocery prices. No strategy for the budget. No talk about hearings on affordability or inflation or the stock market. Just revenge. That’s all they’re talking about, two weeks before an election they believe to be sewn up.

2. Polling & Media. This is an old story. The polls and media are garbage, but garbage that serves to queer elections. Is there anyone who still needs receipts on media bias and its contagion? 
The media has been found out so many times, I believe bias-awareness is baked into the news experience. A lot of news churn, but low trust. Let's skip to the polling:
  • Republican Pollster Finds Long-Term Trend Of Polls Overestimating Democrats August 18, 2026
  • Polling Firm Closes After Releasing Fake Election Surveys For 'Social Experiment' August 19, 2026
    Median Strategies, which released polls indicating Los Angeles Democratic Mayor Karen Bass and Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong leading their rivals by wide margins [They both lost.], announced this week that the surveys were a hoax and that it has shut down.
    [These surveys were NOT 'social experiments'. Their intent was to queer elections.]
  • Wedgewood Admits Fabricating Polls, Many Boosting Dems in GOP States October 21, 2026
    Wedgewood Polling has confessed that almost all of its election surveys were fabricated, including fake polls showing Democrats unusually competitive in Republican-held states just two weeks before the midterms. The company calls it a ‘social experiment’ exposing weak safeguards, adding to scepticism toward pollsters, aggregators and media outlets that picked up its numbers.
    • Wedgewood posted this (via Instapundit) on X, and has now disappeared itself: “Despite having no history, formal credentials, or real data behind the vast majority of our releases, Wedgewood Polling was added to major polling aggregators, including The New York Times, FiftyPlusOne, and VoteHub, and repeatedly treated as a legitimate data source.”
      [What a co-inky-dink. Both Median Strategies and Wedgewood only fabricated polls favoring specific Democrat outcomes. That's not a 'social experiment', that's push-polling.]
  • Ben Shapiro On X October 21, 2026: A pollster faked all his data and just got caught months later. So, here’s the lesson: people don’t know how to read polls, poll aggregators are garbage-in-garbage-out, and every major Senate race right now is a statistical dead heat. So go vote.
  • unseen1 On X October 22, 2026: Look at who is outing these fake pollsters and ask yourself why they are doing so at this time? It's not conservatives outing them. The people outing them are trying to get ahead of something and set a narrative. You be the judge of what they are trying to get ahead of and what narrative they could produce from outing their own fake pollsters 2 weeks before an election.....
    [How can this NOT be illegal?]
3. Candidate Quality. Where to start with this? Only a sampling...
...just a sampling. This cycle has also seen the Democrat's cozy embrace of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which is Communism straight up, no more patty-cake with wussy proto-communist socialism. It's the real deal from right-think to choco rations to gulags.
Just a sampling.

4. Moola.
5. October Developments. 
If you've read this far, congratulations. Here is all the above in snack-size summation:
  1. It's the economy, stupid! The Democrats have no legislative platform. They think they can win on promises of impeachments and lawfare. But they cannot govern on impeachments and lawfare. 
  2. The polls and media are the final bottoms in a Sodomy Conga Line of ideological conveyance. To wit,  polls and media take it up the pooter for the DNC/DSA; the DNC/DSA takes it up the pooter for fabulously wealthy prog donors; fabulously wealthy prog donors take it up the pooter for the Islamo-, Marxist-, Toffler-, Schawbby/Davos true believers; the true believers take it up the pooter by the long-schlonged Dark Powers.
  3. The DNC has fielded a wild collection of dimwits and quislings and dimwit quislings. These include anti-Semites, Islamo-fascists, anarcho-Marxists-qua-socialists, the pedo-adjacent LGBTTQQFAGPBDSM+++, and the all-in-one anti-Semitic Islamo-pedo-fascistic anarcho-Marxist Stalinist.  
  4. Having burned $2B in 2024, the DNC hasn't the money to go large. 
  5. October events favor Republicans and damn Democrats.
Having made my case, here are the qualifiers:
  • I recognize that the Democrats are up against Republicans, the world champs at queering the surest of sure things, e.g., midterms 2022. 
  • The American electorate is not dumb but can be duped and has been duped before, e.g., Obama 2008. 
  • The Democrats ability to cheat is largely unchecked (thanks, John Thune). Democrats no longer care about being caught, because they know undoing an illegitimate win is much harder than proving an illegitimate win, Q.E.D., Biden 2020.
  • The Color Revolution is real and in play and will remain so until every quisling is charged, convicted, and hanged by the neck. Until then it is an all-bets-off wild card.
  • Gas priced above $4.00 on November 3 may give outcomes a bluish tint.
End of transmission.
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)