Thursday, July 02, 2026

Ray-Ban Semiology: France's "Top-Gunned" President and the Mystique Granted by His Dark Aviator Shades


It turns out that France's president has taken to wear aviator glasses. As the Élysée Palace explains that one of Emmanuel Macron's eyes is suffering from an unspecified illness or trauma, Élodie Mielczareck thinks that there is more to the story, however.

Indeed, his shades have become a political sign, the semiology expert explains to Madame Figaro's  in Pourquoi Emmanuel Macron porte-t-il des lunettes aviateur ?

Their shape is far from insignificant: their large, wraparound lenses cover the entire field of vision, including peripheral vision. Originally, they were a piece of technical equipment designed to protect US military pilots from UV rays at high altitudes—hence the name Ray-Ban, literally meaning "banish sun rays."

I cannot deny how stupid I felt since I have considered ray-bans to be such a hallowed name in luxury items that it never dawned on me that the name simply refers to their original practical intent. (Could it be that I am maybe not alone and that many readers, such as Sébastien Laye, feel the same way?)

But very quickly, function gives way to symbolism. Aviator sunglasses no longer merely protect against the sun; they become a status symbol. They inherit the entire mystique of the fighter pilot: courage, composure, technical mastery, and authority. 

 … The object invokes a heroic masculinity—one now made accessible to everyone, without effort or risk. For the price of a pair of glasses, one buys a touch of the fighter pilot’s aura: the cool composure, the technical mastery, and the gaze that scans the horizon while remaining unreadable in return.

Moreover, says Elodie Mielczareck — who has written before about another president, the American one (A Frenchwoman's Detective Work on Donald Trump and His Choice of Language, Donald Trump the Punchline President) as well as about Elon Musk (Throughout History, Elon Musk's Alleged Nazi-Fascist Salute Has Meant Many Different Things) and the yellow jacket movement (Sémiologie du gilet jaune : Entre mots, symboles et imaginaires) — has this to add about France's "Top Gunned president" and his glasses' "physiological barrier": 

Regarding these particular glasses, there is a crucial aspect to mention: the mirrored lens creates an asymmetry in the gaze. The wearer of Aviator-style glasses sees without being seen—they look out, yet their eyes remain hidden from the other person. It is an object that generates power by concealing part of the face: one gains access not to the individual, but only to their role—to the function signified by the object itself. The "Top Gun" glasses do more than shield the eyes from the sun; they conceal the subject behind a persona—specifically, that of the aerial hero—which bears no relation to the original optical instrument.

The Milei Revolution: Javier Milei, the Economist Who Frightens the World's Leftists and Shakes the Planet


After the publication of the Michael Miguères book, La Révolution Milei, Sébastien Laye writes a book review in Valeurs Actuelles, whose VA imprint published the book. 

Javier Milei divides, fascinates, and disturbs. Through Michael Miguères’s book, a dive into the intellectual foundations of a radical liberal doctrine that could well inspire France

A radical liberal doctrine that could well inspire France, the rest of Europe, and certainly America…

One week from today, on July 9 from 3 to 9 pm, Sébastien Laye will be the guest of honor at the Maison de la Chimie's La Journée de la Liberté (the Day of Freedom)…

Sébastien Laye : La Révolution Milei

CHRONIQUE. Javier Milei divise, fascine et dérange. À travers le livre de Michael Miguères, plongée dans les fondements intellectuels d'une doctrine libérale radicale qui pourrait bien inspirer la France.

Wednesday, July 01, 2026

Iran Expert Timmerman Is Optimistic About the Outcome of the War with Iran's Islamic Republic

During a recent get-together at a Paris restaurant, members of Republicans Overseas welcomed Ken Timmerman, author of several books, the latest of which is The Iran House (Tales of Revolution, Persecution, War, and Intrigue).

Highly critical of the bad faith of Iran, a country he has visited manby times, the investigative reporter, who wrote Countdown to Crisis: The Coming Nuclear Showdown With Iran (Crown Forum, 2005) 20 years ago, is quite optimistic about the way the Iran war is going and doesn't believe for a second that Donald Trump has lost sight of his goals.

He is also the author of such books as of Preachers of Hate: Islam and the War on America (Crown Forum, 2003), Deception: The Making of the YouTube Video Hillary and Obama Blamed for Benghazi (PostHill Press/Simon & Schuster, 2016)Selling Out America: The American Spectator Investigations (the Whole Story of Bill Clinton's Corrupt Relationship with Communist China), Shakedown: Exposing the Real Jesse Jackson (Regnery Publishing, March 2002), and The French Betrayal of America (Crown Forum, 2004).  

You can see how much he has been in the been in the news, especially since February, by visiting his blog.

Saturday, June 27, 2026

MITA! Is Trump's Iran Agreement Worse than Obama's JCPOA? Is It a Munich Deal That Will Lead to MITA (Make Iran Terrorist Again)?


The US-Iran agreement is not only something that Philippe Karsenty is critical of, it is something that literally horrifies him. 

It is a resounding military victory transformed into a strategic and diplomatic defeat, the spokesman for le Comité Trump France tells Belgium's 21News channel, with Nicolas de Pape summarizing Karsenty's viewpoints as follows:

Philippe Karsenty considers the Iran-US agreement highly unfavorable to Washington and Israel, arguing that an Israeli-American military victory risks turning into a strategic defeat.

He accuses JD Vance of pushing Donald Trump toward a dangerous stance—one that is overly conciliatory toward Tehran and its regional allies.

In his view, key objectives—regarding the nuclear program, missiles, proxy forces, and the weakening of the regime—have not been met.

Finally, he views Qatar as a major strategic player in this unfolding situation, accusing it of exerting profound influence in the West. 

Moreover, Philippe Karsenty, who has made similar arguments on BFMTV and on Radio Shalom, suggests that Iran is like the Mafia and goes on to compare the deal to the infamous Munich agreement. Iranians

may well be pulling off a genuine diplomatic heist. The military loser is walking away with the political spoils. The result of this agreement is, in a sense, MIGA—“Make Iran Great Again”—or rather MITA: “Make Iran Terrorist Again.”

For that reason, the spokesman for le Comité Trump France likens the conflict to a tennis match which was won 6-0,-6-0, only to have the trophy bestowed upon the loser. He goes on to point to what lurks below the surface, such as Qatar's shenaningans and the following headache:

The fundamental problem is that Iran has colonized Lebanon through Hezbollah. Consequently, an attack on Hezbollah is portrayed as an attack on Iran. This is completely abnormal. 

Nevertheless, Karsenty ends with a note of optimism:

In my view, the only remaining hope is that this text does not go through and that, within sixty days, it founders against the reality of the depravity and duplicity of the regime in Tehran.

Friday, June 26, 2026

115 Degrees — a Historic Heat Wave: June 23rd Was The Hottest Day in French History


In France, June 22nd turned out to be the hottest day on record, writes Le Parisien, only to be dethroned the very next day, with the symbolic mark of an average temperature of 30ºC (86ºF) nationwide overtaken for the very first time, while the heat managed to reach 46ºC (114.8ºF) in one town in the South of France.

Over at Le Journal du Dimanche, Sébastien Laye warns that 

In a France already stuck in low growth, extreme heat threatens productivity, investment, and public finances [and the country's] GDP threatens to melt in the sun.
image

In No Air Conditioning, Please, We’re French, the Wall Street Journal (merci à Vincent Bourdonneau) sounds dubious about France's (lack of a) response:

[What makes this] all the stranger [is that] that governments [in Europe] prefer that their citizens sweat it out rather than use the modern invention known as air conditioning. … Green virtue-signaling is now becoming a health risk in the summer. A report released recently by IGNES, a French trade alliance, warns of “a massive inadequacy of housing to cope with high temperatures.” Nearly half of the homes it looked at become “thermal kettles” during heat waves.

Over at Le Journal du Dimanche, Sébastien Laye warns that 

In a France already stuck in low growth, extreme heat threatens productivity, investment, and public finances [and the country's] GDP threatens to melt in the sun.

Canicule historique : ce mercredi est la journée la plus chaude jamais enregistrée en France, le record établi mardi déjà battu

La France a enregistré ce mercredi le record de température nationale, battant celui qui avait été établi hier. C’est la première fois que la barre des 30 °C de moyenne est atteinte.

L’épisode caniculaire en cours continue de battre tous les records. Pour le deuxième jour consécutif, la température moyenne recensée en France n’a jamais été aussi haute. Aujourd’hui, le mercure est grimpé jusqu’à 30 °C. Du jamais-vu. Mardi, la température moyenne nationale avait atteint 29,8 °C, dépassant ainsi le précédent record de 29,47 °C, observé le 5 août 2003.

La température nationale est mesurée par l’indicateur thermique national (ITN), moyenne quotidienne des températures aussi bien diurnes que nocturnes de 30 stations météorologiques de référence en France métropolitaine.

Cet indicateur diffère des records locaux de température, qui sont des mesures de température maximale à un instant précis de la journée dans une station du réseau. Le record absolu de température en France métropolitaine est de 46 °C, observé le 28 juin 2019 à Vérargues, dans l’Hérault.

La vague de chaleur qui touche la France métropolitaine depuis le 17 juin a fait monter les températures à 40 °C ou au-delà dans plus de 50 départements, principalement dans l’ouest et le sud du pays, selon l’analyse par l’AFP des données de Météo France jusqu’au 23 juin.


Thursday, June 25, 2026

From the 13 Colonies' Insurrection to Independence: The Birth of the Young American Republic

• With Britons from the British Isles fighting against Britons from North America, the conflict of the 1770s was often described, certainly at first, as a civil war or a war between brothers. As a shocked Virginia farmer put it (none other than George Washington) after hearing the news from Massachusetts of Concord and Lexington, 

Unhappy it is … to reflect that a brother's sword has been sheathed in a brother's breast and that the once happy and peaceful plains of America are either to be drenched with blood or inhabited by slaves.

Ten days before the 250th birthday of America's Declaration of Independence, I was a guest of Evelyne Joslain on her Radio Courtoisie program to talk not about the news for once, but to engage for an hour and a half on a history stroll through the first half century of the American Republic.

What is essentially a podcast goes over 50 years of American history, from the French and Indian War and the Boston Tea Party through the revolutionary years and the writing of the Constitution until Jefferson's purchase of the Louisiana territory and the Lewis and Clark expedition. (Thanks for the the Instalink, Sarah.)

A second podcast, due a month from now on July 22, will treat the next century of American history, from the War of 1812 and the Texas Revolution through the conquest of the Wild West and the Civil War to the closing of the frontier and the Spanish-American War.

I am grateful that we have received lots of congratulations from people who added that they have learned a lot. The podcast is in French, but here are some of the subjects that, beyond the top paragraph above, I mentioned:

• What with the redcoats' aim at Concord and Lexington, it turns out that a major reason for the outbreak of the revolution was the government's attempt at (what we in today's parlance would call) gun control. 

• The term "Americans" (in centuries past used only for… the Indians) had slowly but surely come to be used for the Britons from North America — by both the latter and by the Britons from the British Isles — to mark the growing difference between — but to what extent is the following description 100% correct? — the two (?) peoples (or the two populations of the same people). In that perspective, the insurrectionists who dumped the tea in Boston's harbor during the Tea Party of 1773 not only disguised themselves as Indians, but disguised themselves in fact as… Americans!

• Why were the colonies so set against taxes from London? Weren't they ingrates regarding the French & Indian War? The answer is simply that, in the view of the colonists, the empire was sort of like the Commonwealth today. Granted, every member is under the king (George III or Charles III), but: apart from that, every part should take care of nobody but the people within its own domain. Let London take care of the Britons within the borders of England while Philadelphia takes care of the Britons within the borders of Pennsylvania. England should no more make decisions about (and levy taxes on) the Britons in Maryland or in Virginia than Philadelphia should make decisions about (and levy taxes on) Britons in Georgia and in South Carolina — or, for that matter, in… England itself! 

• However, we must be realistic, right? Britain is an empire, correct? Now, if you accept this and that, therefore, it needs a centralizing center of power, then fine, by all means let it be London. (Where else would it be?!) But in that case, let it be composed of Members of Parliament not only from Birmingham and Leeds and Edinburgh, but of MPs from all parts of the British Empire around the planet (including the 13 colonies and Québec). To summarize this in four (well-known) words: No taxation without representation. (By the way, did you know that while none of the colonies on the mainland had a representative in London, the sugar island of Jamaica did have one?)

• What is amazing is the young ages of the founding fathers. At the time of the Declaration of Independence (1776), Jefferson was 33, John Adams was 40, Washington was 44. At the time of the Constitution (1787), James Madison was 36, James Monroe was 29, Alexander Hamilton was 30, John Jay was 41. (And how about Lafayette — how old was he when he became a general in the Continental Army? Read the answer below…)

• Every single sentence of the Constitution provides the same message: that the citizen is a free man

• There are quite a number of parallels between POTUS1 and POTUS47 (aka POTUS45):

— As president George Washington had a powerful message:  "The promotion of domestic manufactures will, in my conception, be among the first consequences which may naturally be expected to flow from an energetic government." According to Ron Chernow, George Washington 

believed that "commercial connections, of all others, are the most difficult to dissolve," which foreshadowed his faith as president in enduring commercial rather than political ties with other countries.

— Also — just like Trump's bombings taking out Iran's leadership (not to mention his Caracas raid taking out Venezuela's lider maximo) — the Continental Army would deliberately aim for enemy officers; which was deplored by the Royal Army as that was not how wars were fought between "gentleman" in those times.

• Used to gathering at inns, the Founding Fathers' generation was higher into liqueurs and other types of alcohol than their descendants are two centuries later. Benjamin Franklin once said: “In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is Freedom, in water there is bacteria.” The greatest distiller of whiskey in North America was located at… Mount Vernon; George Washington produced 41.000 liters of whiskey per year.

• After purchasing Louisiana territory, Jefferson offered the post of governor of the territory to a dual citizen, aka "the hero of two worlds" — the Marquis de Lafayette.

• Because it is a French podcast (en français), we focused quite a bit on French subjects such as Louis XVI's military intervention and French officers, notably the nobleman whom George Washington considered a son. Lafayette was only 19 when he became a general in the American army. His own (real) son was named Georges Washington de Lafayette and the last of his three daughters was named Marie-Antoinette Virginie Lafayette. This led Benjamin Franklin to quip that his wife had only 12 more children to give birth to (in order to have one child named after every state). 

• Although it depends on how the statistics are used, there seems to be more more places and townships named after Lafayette than after Washington, Jefferson, or Lincoln.

How exactly were the Indians' lands "stolen"? By the end of July 1804, after sailing 600 miles up the Missouri River for two months (since leaving on May 21), the members of the Lewis and Clark expedition had not once met a single American Indian. 

 
Here are some related history NP posts written over the past 22 years: 

• What Caused Secession and Ergo the Civil War? Was It Slavery and/or States' Rights? Or Wasn't It Rather Something Else — the Election of a Ghastly Republican to the White House
• During the Winter of 1860-1861, Did the South's Democrats Obtain Their Aim — the Secession of 7 Slave States — Thanks to Elections Filled with Stealth, Lies, Voter Fraud, Intimidation, Violence, and Murder? (Wait 'til You Hear About… Georgia's Dark Secret)
• Wondering Why Slavery Persisted for Almost 75 Years After the Founding of the USA? According to Lincoln, the Democrat Party's "Principled" Opposition to "Hate Speech" 
• The Greatest Myth in U.S. History: Yes, the Civil War Era Did Feature Champions of States' Rights, But No, They Were Not in the South (Au Contraire)
• Harry Jaffa on the Civil War Era: For Democrats of the 21st Century as of the 19th, "the emancipation from morality was/is itself seen as moral progress" 
• "Break Their Spirit" with "Maximum Warfare": What Nobody Tells You About Reconstruction in the South After the American Civil War
• Why Does Nobody Ever Fret About Scandinavia's — Dreadful — 19th-C Slavery Conditions? 
• A Century and Half of Apartheid Policies:  From Its 1828 Foundation, the Democrat Party Has Never Shed Its Racist Past 
• The Confederate Flag: Another Brick in the Leftwing Activists' (Self-Serving) Demonization of America and Rewriting of History 
• How to Prevent America from Becoming a Totalitarian State 
• Inside of a month, Democrats have redefined riots and election challenges from the highest form of patriotism to an attack on democracy — And by “democracy”, they mean the Democrat Party
• Why They Don't Tell You the Whole Truth: The 1619 Project Summarized in One Single Sentence 

Libre journal du nouveau monde du 24 juin 2026 : « De l’insurrection des Treize Colonies à l’Indépendance : les débuts de la jeune Amérique »

Libre journal du nouveau monde du 24 juin 2026

Cliquez sur le lien pour entendre l'émission d'une heure et demie…

Patron d'émission du Libre journal du Nouveau Monde à Radio Courtoisie, Évelyne Joslain est l'auteur d'une poignée de livres sur les États-Unis et l'Occident. Parmi ceux-ci, son chef d'œuvre est paru il y a deux ans.  Voici la revue du livre La Guerre Culturelle.

Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Laye: "The Dollar Is No Longer Alone in America's Financial Domination" of the Planet

The Americans are prioritizing competition between private companies and innovation, answers Sébastien Laye over at Valeurs Actuelles as he responds to the questions of the weekly's Eric Revel, who asks specifically how come the American economy is showing such a "superperformance."

"The dollar is no longer alone in America's financial domination" adds Sébastien Laye, who is an admirer of the Milei revolution, to Valeurs Actuelles, referencing such elements as stable coins, banking platforms. and world investment funds, along with the law. ) Merci pour l'Instalien, Sarah.)

"A Total Defeat," a "Capitulation," a "Catastrophe", Warns a French Trump Supporter Regarding the Iran-USA Treaty


It is a strategic defeat, a capitulation, a catastrophe, answered Philippe Karsenty when asked on Radio Shalom (FM94.8) whether he, as the spokesman of the Comité Trump France, isn't grieving. 

Echoing his own comments on BFMTV five days earlier, Philippe goes on to talk about his fears regarding the Versailles treaty between Iran and America. However, he does allow for it all being some sort of a Trump ruse… (After all, Fox News just reported that POTUS 47 warned Tehran that "he would take whatever action he deems necessary if Iran fails to uphold its commitments … after talks in Switzerland" while BFMTV — and Putin — is now wondering whether "Trump has tricked the Russians?")

In any case, Philippe adds, Israel must improve its public relations and, above all, Jerusalem must try to "neutralize the power of JD Vance." (Merci à Sarah pour l'Instalien)

22 juin 2026 - Philippe Karsenty s'exprime sur l'accord de Versailles et sur son implémentation 



Tuesday, June 23, 2026

Switzerland owes its good governance in part to the fact that its elected officials are often ordinary citizens who return to private life after their term of office


Asking that his fellow countrymen stop believing in leftist fairy tales over on the Atlantico website, Jean-Paul Oury calls for a fundamental change in how the president is chosen to run the country. For the 2027 presidential election, "let us not be satisfied with a future president, let us demand the president of the future" (En 2027, ne nous contentons pas d’un futur président, exigeons le président du futur).

There is no such thing as a providential leader, just as there is no such thing as a welfare state. It's a dangerous fiction. A bad leader, on the other hand, can cause considerable damage. 

 … Switzerland owes its good governance in part to the fact that its elected officials are often ordinary citizens who return to private life after their term of office.

This, of course, is the genius behind limiting American presidents to two terms in the White House; although as many have pointed out over the decades, it should be applied to both houses of Congress as well. Once they have run out of terms, let the (now ex-) politicians return to private life to live under the very rules that they have set up.

 

 

 

 

 

En 2027, ne nous contentons pas d’un futur président, exigeons le président (1) du futur 

Plus que les précédentes, les présidentielles de 2027 auront un enjeu existentiel. Il ne s’agira pas seulement d’élire le futur président mais de sélectionner le président du futur si on veut que la France continue de jouer un rôle dans l’histoire des grandes démocraties. Commençons

 par éliminer les caractères indésirables de ce candidat mystère avant de décrire le caractère spécifique recherché.

Pas un homme providentiel 

Il n’existe pas plus d’homme providentiel que d’État providence. C’est une dangereuse fiction. Un mauvais dirigeant peut en revanche causer des dégâts considérables.

 … La Suisse doit en partie sa bonne gestion au fait que ses élus sont souvent des citoyens ordinaires qui retournent à la vie privée après leur mandat. À l’inverse, la France souffre de politiciens professionnels sans autre expérience, qui s’accrochent à leurs postes.  

Monday, June 22, 2026

James Fenimore Cooper, 2 Centuries Ago: “the American press is the pest of society, the bane of decency, the perverter of truth, and the pander of crime”

As the 1826 novel The Last of the Mohicans turns 200 this year, it is worth our salt to head to the New York Times in order to check out the  book review of Alex Wright's EMPIRE OF INK: The Printers, Rogues, and Radicals Who Invented the American Newspaper. (Thanks for the Instalink, Sarah.)

Empire of Ink

Her New York Times review, titled A Spunky History of Newspapers Adds Color to the Black and White, of this "unsentimental history of the American newspaper from the Revolutionary War to the beginning of the 20th century" shows how, already two to three centuries ago, "newspapermen were held in low repute" (and how!) 

Besides Samuel Clemens, a.k.a. Mark Twain, a number of classic authors are mentioned in the review as well as in the book. What they thought about the press and how they fought back, in writing as in deed, can be described as far stronger than any railings and any comebacks Donald Trump has undertaken against "fake news." 

Charles Dickens, a former reporter … whose books were hugely successful in serial, found the American penny papers “so filthy and so bestial that no honest man would admit one into his house, for a water-closet door-mat.” The hero of his “Life and Adventures of Martin Chuzzlewit” is confronted with self-important scandal sheets like The New York Sewer and The New York Rowdy Journal.

James Fenimore Cooper filed 14 libel suits against various newspapers, all of which he won, and declared that “the American press is the pest of society, the bane of decency, the perverter of truth and the pander of crime.” (He would fit right in on Threads.)

Edgar Allan Poe once challenged the editor of The Richmond Examiner, a defender of slavery who’d written about Poe’s rumored affair with a local widow, to a duel. The poet showed up too drunk to fight; they repaired to a tavern and became lifelong friends.

 
The "water-closet" that Dickens mentions is of course a toilet (WC). As far as Poe is concerned, who can deny they wouldn't love to see a duel between Donald Trump and George Stephanopoulos? (Pistols or sabers?) 

If the internet is to be believed (and I'm sorry, I don't remember exactly where I got this particular meme from), Hunter Thompson said something quite similar in the 20th century…