Wednesday, January 22, 2025

Giving away 'Get Out Of Jail Free Cards' like penny candy to the criminally liable lords of misrule hollows out the Democrats' lawfare schtick of 'No one above the law'

No One NOT Named Biden Is Above The Law

The snakes are let slither away. writes Damian Bennett.

Biden: The issuance of these pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offense. ... Our nation owes these public servants a debt of gratitude for their tireless commitment to our country.”
W-T-ever-loving-F.
APThe pardons, announced with just hours left in Biden’s presidency, have been the subject of heated debate for months at the highest levels of the White House. It’s customary for a president to grant clemency at the end of his term, but those acts of mercy are usually offered to Americans who have been convicted of crimes. Biden, a Democrat, has used the power in the broadest and most untested way possible: to pardon those who have not even been investigated.

Done under cover of the Trump inauguration, of the national global jubilation of a revenant Trump presidency. These 'pardons' need to be challenged in the court, by which I mean put-paid-to by SCOTUS. Let us be clear:

A PARDON IS NOT A QUITTANCE.
THERE CAN BE NO QUITTANCE WITHOUT A CRIME ALLEGED OR INDICTED OR TRIED.
A PARDON FOR A CRIME NEITHER ALLEGED NOR INDICTED NOR TRIED IS A LEGAL FICTION AT BEST, 
AT WORST, IT IS JUSTICE SUBORNED.

Had Biden kept to the expected pardon -- in the teeth of his repeated heated denials and solemn abjurations -- for his convicted corrupt son, people by and large would have let it slide as an act of parental patheticism. But giving away 'Get Out Of Jail Free Cards' like penny candy to the criminally liable lords of misrule hollows out the Democrats' lawfare schtick of 'No one above the law'. Clearly for Biden and those who will rush to the defense of these pardons, clearly there are those who are above the law: pets and pals, pimps and whores, goons and stooges, all the people, big and small, who made the surreality of the Biden occupancy a daily reality.

Words fail. [Anguished pause.] Please, some student of history find me a more corrupt, more detestable American president. Find me a more self-serving shameless abuser of the public trust. [A reasonable wait.] Cannot be done because cannot be found. Biden stands alone, he has no peer. He has bested all the worst of the worst to be the super-superlative worst, and -- God have mercy -- let us hope for all time.

 … Noon January 20, 2025 -- FJB [was] truly and finally f*cked. Good riddance to bad rot.

But Damian Bennett ain't finished. No sirree. C'est mal connaître l'homme

Biden Crime Family Scorecard 

On the tick of 11:50A today, Joe Biden lost the magical power to pardon crimes unalleged, unindicted, untried, and unsentenced. (Someone in the BOO-hoo corner has a big sad. So unfair.) 
No One NOT Named Biden Is Above The Law
  
CNN: President Trump is reportedly considering a wave of preemptive pardons. Does this concern you?
Biden: Well, it's, uh, it concerns me in terms of, uh, what kind of precedent it sets and how the rest of the world looks at us as a nation of laws and, uh, and justice. Um, you're not going to see, uh, um, in our administration that kind of approach to pardons, um, nor are you going to see in our administration, uh, that approach to making policy by tweets, um, you know, it's just going to be a totally different way in which we approach the justice system.

My family has been subjected to unrelenting attacks and threats, motivated solely by a desire to hurt me—the worst kind of partisan politics.  Unfortunately, I have no reason to believe these attacks will end.

I believe in the rule of law, and I am optimistic that the strength of our legal institutions will ultimately prevail over politics.
BBBBBBBAH-UTT...
...baseless and politically motivated investigations wreak havoc on the lives, safety, and financial security of targeted individuals and their families.  Even when individuals have done nothing wrong and will ultimately be exonerated, the mere fact of being investigated or prosecuted can irreparably damage their reputations and finances.

That is why I am exercising my power under the Constitution to pardon James B. Biden, Sara Jones Biden, Valerie Biden Owens, John T. Owens, and Francis W. Biden. The issuance of these pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that they engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offense.

The 'pardon' reads: 

A FULL AND UNCONDITIONAL PARDON FOR ANY NONVIOLENT OFFENSES against the United States which they might have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014, through the date of this pardon.

Ahem. The construals construe themselves.

Let's see what SCOTUS has to say, Burdick v. United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915):
  • Acceptance, as well as delivery, of a pardon is essential to its validity; if rejected by the person to whom it is tendered, the court has no power to force it on him.
  • This brings us to the differences between legislative immunity and a pardon. They are substantial. The latter carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it...
  • A pardon is an act of grace, proceeding from the power entrusted with the execution of the laws, which exempts the individual on whom it is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for a crime he has committed. It is the private though official act of the executive magistrate, delivered to the individual for whose benefit it is intended ... A private deed, not communicated to him, whatever may be its character, whether a pardon or release, is totally unknown and cannot be acted on.
  • Formal acceptance is necessary to give effect to the pardons. If a pardon is rejected, it cannot be forced upon its subject.
Here are the quick takes from my reading of Burdick:
  • A pardon imputes guilt.
  • To have effect a pardon must be accepted -- and with it the imputation of guilt -- and entered into the court (delivery) in response to the pertinent indictment, verdict, or sentence.
  • A person may reject a pardon and its taint, and the court has no power to effectuate its purpose. 
The Biden DOJ certainly thought pardons to be an open legal admission of guilt.

Biden DOJ prosecutors before U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols: “[A] pardon at some unspecified date in the future ... would not unring the bell of conviction. ... In fact, quite the opposite. The defendant would first have to accept the pardon, which necessitates a confession of guilt.” ... J6 defendants have increasingly been seeking “pardons of innocence,” claiming Trump has the authority to grant them clemency without forcing an admission of guilt. Those who haven’t been convicted are hoping Trump’s Justice Department simply drops their charges, obviating the need for a pardon altogether.

[Hold on, a sidebar: 

"So this is a big one. We hope they come out tonight."
DJT refers to them as hostages. Justice come due.]

So. All the 'unguilty' lambs pardoned by Biden can still be brought up on charges. Let them formally accept their pardons with the taint of guilt, lose their 5A right in doing so (their testimony cannot incriminate them for the pardoned crime), THEN be questioned under oath about the criminality behind their pardon and risk perjuring themselves, which they will. They will lie, because they are liars. They will ALL lie. When their lies do not prevail they will -- in ones and twos at first, then everyone in tears all at once --  snitch out their confederates, their family, their friends. I am not a lawyer, but that is how I would run a prosecution.

“Implication is that they needed the pardons… So, let’s call them all before Congress and demand the truth. If they refuse or lie – let’s test the constitutional ‘reach’ of these pardons with regard to their future actions.”

Q: Why would the unindicted, untried, and unsentenced need pardons? Let J6 censored serial-liar Adam Schiff (CA-D) explain:

Joy Reid (MSNBC, December 2020): Have you ever heard of somebody getting a preemptive pardon who is an innocent person?
Schiff: No.

"Don't go down that road, Mr. President." Today Adam Schiff received a preemptive pardon down that very road. 

Q: Why would the unindicted, untried, and unsentenced want pardons? Let J6 Committee Hatchetman Jamie Raskin (MD-D) explain:

CNN: You revealed this week that multiple Republican members of Congress sought pardons from President Trump after the insurrection. ... And what evidence do you have?
Raskin: Yes. Well, the seeking of pardons is powerful demonstration of the consciousness of guilt, or at least the consciousness that you may be in trouble. And that's what's so shocking about this. It's not just one. It's... 
CNN: And you have evidence that has happened?
Raskin: ...[A]ll in due course, the details will surface.

Hhmmm. That 'due course' never came round. 

Jamie Raskin also received his preemptive mob pardon today. Let Messrs. Schiff and Raskin and their newly minted 'jail free' J6 hangmen test their innocence by forswearing their pardons' acceptance. Let them gamble exoneration in a court of law. It is a mistake not to force the hands of these ethically bankrupt scoundrels, wholly corrupt grifters, shameless liars, chump-change quislings, to wit, it is a mistake not to prosecute these garbage people. Because...

Justice Come Due

Because, gentle reader, they are ALL guilty, guilty as sin. There are mountains of evidence, droves of witnesses, reams of data attesting to their guilt. A pardon is the last refuge of these garbage people, which people who peddle political influence to enrich themselves, who are disloyal to country and Constitution, who maliciously and savagely cut down rightful dissent, such people are garbage people. Let's be done with them.

Related: If Biden Had Wanted to Appear Bipartisan, the White House Should Have Pardoned the J6 Protesters As Well

"Donald Trump has been in power only a single day and the whole world is already unsettled"

Le jour après l'investiture du 47ème président américain, le porte-parole du Comité France Trump, Philippe Karsenty, était l'un des invités avec Olivier Dartigolles de On Marche sur la tête de Cyril Hanouna sur Europe 1.

Cyril Hanouna : "Il y a une énorme différence entre Éric Zemmour et Donald Trump"

Philippe Karsenty, lui, a dit (14:30)que

«Donald Trump, ça fait un seul jour qu’il est au pouvoir et le monde est déjà bouleversé»

Un jour plus tôt, Géraldine Maillet avait précisé que «Donald Trump a sifflé la fin de la récré pour les wokistes et la cancel culture qui sont allés tellement loin».

Tuesday, January 21, 2025

"The America That I Dreamt of When I Was a Kid Is Back in the Saddle"


Joining Republicans and conservatives of every nationality for the Donald Trump inauguration on Monday evening (Paris time) at the Frog Pop House in Paris, Hélène Roué wrote an article for Le Journal de Dimanche entitled "L’Amérique dont je rêvais enfant est de retour : à Paris aussi, les partisans de Trump fêtent l’investiture de leur champion."

Ce lundi 20 janvier, il n’était pas nécessaire de traverser l’Atlantique pour se retrouver en Amérique. Au 1er étage du très anglophone bar Frog Pop House, dans le 2e arrondissement de Paris, se retrouvaient les adhérents et sympathisants des Republicans Overseas France, afin de savourer en bonne compagnie l’investiture de leur champion Donald Trump

 … Le drapeau américain est sur toutes les tables, les casquettes MAGA (Make America Great Again) sont de sortie, des serre-tête et des serviettes reproduisant la bannière étoilée sont à disposition. Les Republicans Overseas, bien que loin de chez eux, n’ont pas peur d’être patriotes. 

 … Les réactions changent du tout au tout quand l’écran affiche JD Vance et Donald Trump. « L’âge d’or de l’Amérique commence maintenant », déclare Trump sous la coupole du Capitole. Les applaudissements, les « Yeah ! » et les « Thank God ! » brisent le silence de la salle, qui écoute religieusement son nouveau président. Idem lorsque Trump évoque ses tentatives d’assassinat qui ont bouleversé la campagne électorale. La phrase qui fait néanmoins exploser l’applaudimètre de la soirée est : « There will only be two genders » (« Il n’y a que deux genres »). Les soupirs de soulagements se mêlent aux yeux admiratifs fixant l’écran.

 … Les réactions changent du tout au tout quand l’écran affiche JD Vance et Donald Trump. « L’âge d’or de l’Amérique commence maintenant », déclare Trump sous la coupole du Capitole. Les applaudissements, les « Yeah ! » et les « Thank God ! » brisent le silence de la salle, qui écoute religieusement son nouveau président. Idem lorsque Trump évoque ses tentatives d’assassinat qui ont bouleversé la campagne électorale. La phrase qui fait néanmoins exploser l’applaudimètre de la soirée est : « There will only be two genders » (« Il n’y a que deux genres »). Les soupirs de soulagements se mêlent aux yeux admiratifs fixant l’écran.

L’organisatrice et violoniste de profession, Camilla Radford Furman, se dit apaisée et calme depuis l’élection de Trump

Après le discours de leur champion, la secrétaire de Republicans Overseas et organisatrice de la soirée, Camilla Radford Furman, fait le tour de la salle. Elle salue ses amis, distribue des petits drapeaux américains en anticipant l’hymne national, qui sera repris en chœur par les convives, de concert avec le ténor Christopher Macchio. Un petit « Inauguration Trivia » en anglais est distribué pour animer la soirée. Parmi les 17 questions : « Qui a été le premier président inauguré à Washington DC ? » ou encore : « Quel président a prononcé les discours les plus courts et les plus longs ? »« Si on n’est pas Américain, ce n’est pas évident », s’amuse Benoît, un sympathisant français qui est là « pour la cause ». Environ 50 % de la salle est d’origine américaine.

Aimee, une femme d’environ 70 ans originaire du Texas, exprime son soulagement. « On allait droit dans le mur du fascisme avec Biden ». Benoît enchaîne : « On espère que ça va insuffler un vent en France ». L’organisatrice et violoniste de profession Camilla se dit apaisée et calme depuis l’élection de Donald Trump. « Le wokisme affecte nos enfants. Mon neveu est allé dans une université en Californie. Ce n’est plus la même personne depuis. Beaucoup d’Américains s’identifient à ce problème ».

L’organisatrice et violoniste de profession, Camilla Radford Furman, se dit apaisée et calme depuis l’élection de Trump

Après le discours de leur champion, la secrétaire de Republicans Overseas et organisatrice de la soirée, Camilla Radford Furman, fait le tour de la salle. Elle salue ses amis, distribue des petits drapeaux américains en anticipant l’hymne national, qui sera repris en chœur par les convives, de concert avec le ténor Christopher Macchio. Un petit « Inauguration Trivia » en anglais est distribué pour animer la soirée. Parmi les 17 questions : « Qui a été le premier président inauguré à Washington DC ? » ou encore : « Quel président a prononcé les discours les plus courts et les plus longs ? »« Si on n’est pas Américain, ce n’est pas évident », s’amuse Benoît, un sympathisant français qui est là « pour la cause ». Environ 50 % de la salle est d’origine américaine.

 … L’organisatrice et violoniste de profession Camilla se dit apaisée et calme depuis l’élection de Donald Trump. « Le wokisme affecte nos enfants. Mon neveu est allé dans une université en Californie. Ce n’est plus la même personne depuis. Beaucoup d’Américains s’identifient à ce problème ».

 … Ancien candidat LR-RN aux législatives dans la circonscription de Gabriel Attal, Sébastien Laye travaille en tant que conseiller économique auprès des Republicans Overseas. Il évoque la mauvaise image que les médias peuvent donner de Donald Trump en France : « L’Amérique se tourne vers le progrès, notamment en termes de tech. On dépeint une image de Trump anti-progressiste, mais c’est tout le contraire qui se passe. L’Amérique dont je rêvais enfant est de retour », explique-t-il, avant de s’amuser : « C’est fou à quel point l’inauguration de Donald Trump a éclipsé le forum de Davos qui a commencé ce matin ».

Trump, le président du peuple

Malgré l’ampleur de ses comptes en banque, Donald Trump est perçu comme un homme du peuple. Bouba, originaire de Côte d’Ivoire, en est un fan de la première heure. « J’ai commencé à suivre ce qu’il faisait en 2015. J’ai tout de suite aimé sa façon de parler. Il est sincère, dit ce qu’il pense. Il est milliardaire mais sait se mettre à la hauteur de tout le monde, raconte-t-il. Ce que Trump a subi dans un pays démocratique, tous ses procès, même les opposants en Afrique ne le subissent pas. S’il avait perdu l’élection, il serait en prison aujourd’hui ».

Erik Svane, binational à moitié danois, estime que Trump a « tout à fait raison » de vouloir conquérir le Groenland

Paul Reen, ancien président des Republicans in France, organisation qui a récemment fusionné avec les Republicans Overseas France, partage le constat de Bouba. « Trump est un milliardaire qui est devenu le président du peuple », lâche-t-il. Cet originaire de Buffalo dans l’État de New York, en France depuis 25 ans, arbore ensuite fièrement son T-shirt où on peut lire : « Never Surrender » (« ne jamais se rendre »), en dessous du « mugshot » de Donald Trump. L’émotion le gagne lorsqu’il évoque son ami iranien qui n’espère qu’une chose : « Que Trump aide à changer ce régime »

Toujours sur le plan géopolitique, Erik Svane, binational à moitié danois, estime que Trump a « tout à fait raison »de vouloir conquérir le Groenland, un territoire autonome du Danemark. « Les militaires là-bas sont "pssshh" », écarte-t-il d’un revers de main.Leurs avions ne savent même pas voler ».

La soirée bat son plein, les commandes de burgers ne s’arrêtent plus et il est toujours impossible de trouver un défaut à ce nouveau président américain.

Actually, that wasn't actually what I said about Greenland. I said that Denmark's military seems inefficient, if Peter Ernstved Rasmussen's book is to be believed, and that the Chinese threat to the largest island on the planet needs to be countered by some serious pushback.

Monday, January 20, 2025

If Biden Had Wanted to Appear Bipartisan, the White House Should Have Pardoned the J6 Protesters As Well


In a breaking news report, PJMedia's Chris Queen writes that 

Biden has mastered the dark art of the preemptive pardon, making sure that people like his son, Hunter, never face accountability for any federal crimes they committed. Interestingly enough, in the case of this morning’s pardons, the outgoing president admitted that he is pardoning people for imagined crimes as well as any real ones.

 … The Associated Press report of these pardons reads like a page from the left’s propaganda machine. …

Interestingly enough, [Colleen Long and Zeke Miller] acknowledge that what Biden has done with his pardons falls far outside convention.

“It’s customary for a president to grant clemency at the end of his term, but those acts of mercy are usually offered to everyday Americans who have been convicted of crimes,” they write. “But Biden has used the power in the broadest and most untested way possible: to pardon those who have not even been investigated yet.”

[Besides Dr. Anthony Fauci and Gen. Mark Milley], Biden pardoned the members of the Jan. 6 committee who “investigated” the incident at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, including former Reps. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, whose Trump Derangement Syndrome was on full display before, during, and after the committee hearings.

Here is my take: If the White House had any sense at all, any whatsoever — and indeed if the Leftists had truly mastered the art of propaganda — they should have tried to appear just the slightest bit bipartisan (or nonpartisan — you takes your pick) and added all the imprisoned J6 protesters to the pardons issued by Joe Biden today. 

They have spent 

(Indeed, why shouldn't Sleepy Joe have tried to pardon none other than… Donald Trump himself? Could he pardon Trump in the New York proceedings? It's (New York) state rather than federal, right? Biden could at least mention an attempt or a willingness to do so.)

Unfortunately, the Left's Drama Queens are too demented and blinded by partisanship to think of things like that… 

Leading the professor to quip: 

Pretty much an admission of criminality.

Related: The Smug Liars’ “Screw-You” Party

Also related: Let's Stop Using the Words "Trump Tried to Overturn the 2020 Election"; It's Unprofessional Journalism

Also from the professor: Have A Happy DJT Day

Update: Giving away 'Get Out Of Jail Free Cards' like penny candy to the criminally liable lords of misrule hollows out the Democrats' lawfare schtick of 'No one above the law'

Sunday, January 19, 2025

VDH: Trump and 'The Art' of the 'Troll'


The Daily Signal interviews Victor Davis Hanson on Trump and 'The Art' of the 'Troll' 

In this edition of The Daily Signal’s “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words,” Hanson delves into former President Donald Trump's negotiation techniques, which critics call “trolling.” 

Hanson discusses how Trump's strategies, as described in 'The Art of the Deal,' play out in various geopolitical scenarios: renaming the Gulf of Mexico, purchasing Greenland, renegotiating the Panama Canal Treaty, and making Canada a state: 

“In the case of renaming the Gulf of Mexico, the Mexican president showed a map recently of the southwest of the United States being part of Mexico. That was her counter. That's kind of a bad troll, because they rely on $63 billion of remittances.” 

The discussion emphasizes Trump's approach of making extreme demands to gain an upper hand and highlights the irony in how he uses left-wing arguments against their proponents. Tune in to understand the intricate dynamics of Trump's methods and their implications on international relations. 

00:00 Introduction to Trump's Trolling Tactics
00:50
Analyzing Trump's Negotiation Strategy
02:07
Case Study: Canada and Trade Imbalance
02:58
Case Study: Greenland and Strategic Interests
03:49
Case Study: Renaming the Gulf of Mexico
04:36
Case Study: Panama Canal and Chinese Influence
05:32
Irony in Trump's Tactics
08:05
Conclusion and Final Thoughts
#panama #inauguration #trump #canada #greenland #california #biden #dailysignal #victordavishanson The Daily Signal cannot continue to tell stories, like this one, without the support of our viewers: https://www.dailysignal.com/

With the high dignity and impeccability of a State religion, the State's agents become a separate and superior caste, with authority to bind and loose, and their thumbs in every pot


You can read 's 1935 book, Our Enemy, The State, for free at the FEE website.

One of the introductory quotes reads thusly: 

“It [the State] has taken on a vast mass of new duties and responsibilities; it has spread out its powers until they penetrate to every act of the citizen, however secret; it has begun to throw around its operations the high dignity and impeccability of a State religion; its agents become a separate and superior caste, with authority to bind and loose, and their thumbs in every pot. But it still remains, as it was in the beginning, the common enemy of all well-disposed, industrious and decent men. 

~ Henry L. Mencken, 1926.


Friday, January 17, 2025

The Smug Liars' "Screw-You" Party


For four years, Joe Biden, along with all the members of his government and all his sympathizers in the Democratic Party, has been effectively saying one thing to the American people: 

Screw you!

(In the first draft of this post, I used the F-bomb throughout, which is really more illustrative; but I decided to tone the voice down.)

Everything the Democrats have done has been Screw you! to the American people.

What have the Democrats done for anybody (whatever their race or sex) who was in the mainstream?

Nothing. (At least, I can think of nothing; please correct me if I am wrong…)

All they have done is coddle minorities, from drag queens to illegal aliens. Not fight for their rights, mind you, but coddle them.

T he Democrats hate you. They call you "domestic terrorists."

You deserve nothing but shame. You are deplorables, racists, fill-in-the-blank-phobes.

Prices have gone up, for groceries, for gas, for home purchase, for everything. (Thanks for the Instalink, professor; also you, Ed.)

For the past four yours, they have let the border wide open. Don't like rapists among their number? Don't like thieves? Don't like murderers? Don't like foreigners who have never learned to drive a car? Don't like Latin American Gangs? Don't like criminals (whether they are foreign-born or American-born)? Don't like terrorists? Don't like the products of cultures which do not value openness, honesty, and mutual respect? Or, in Don Surber's words, "invaders from countries that are immune to civilization"?

F*ck you, gaspole!

See if we care!

Once Kamala Harris lost the 2024 election in spectacular fashion, one might think that the Democrats (or that some Democrats) would gather and say, Okay, it appears rather conclusive that the American people does not want open borders and does not want lax laws for criminals (foreign or domestic). If not, one might at least think that there would be a couple of wise voices saying, Okay, hold your horses, let's lay low…

Instead of reassessing their agenda, the White House's wokesters double down, trying to make the transition as wokish and as leftist as possible, trying to get whole new batches of illegal aliens into the country, trying to sell pieces of Trump's Southern wall at 1% (!) of the price, and pardoning or commuting the sentences of all matters of vicious thugs and murderers. Those are the parting gifts of one Joe Biden.

No, the Drama Queens are still living in a World of Pure Fantasy, a World of Deserving Dreamers Vs. Despicable Deplorables. What this proves — in case you hadn't noticed — is that they have been blazingly lying about it, and about everything else, for the past four years.

Screw you!

Because if they are superior to you, and if they (therefore have reason to) hate you, if the only thing you deserve is to be shamed, well, then, they are entitled to lie to deplorables like you. 

"Of course we are trying to solve the problem of the Southern border. No, we are not turning our schools into LGBTTQ+++ factories. The White House is in no way involved with the Lawfare against Donald Trump. Trump lost the 2020 election, and January 6 is the worst event since 9-11, since Pearl Harbor, and since the Civil War. Everybody in America — at least, those against the Left — is a racist. And the ghastly history of the country is one never-ending hideous series of oppression and genocide."

Don't like our lies?

Fuck you! 

Fuck you, gaspole!


All this has led Stephen Kruiser to write that the Dems Make a Case for One-Party Republican Rule (at Least for a While). The transition has become so ridiculous, it led to a Babylon Bee tongue-in-cheeker titled Biden Desperately Searches For Anything Else He Can Screw Up In The Next 6 Days.

To date, Joe Biden has destroyed the American economy, overseen an invasion of illegal aliens, given Afghanistan terrorists advanced military weaponry and cost the lives of marines, facilitated Iran's funding of Hamas to conduct a terrorist attack on Israel and start a full-blown war in the Middle East, shut down the Nord Stream 2 pipeline to empower Russia and bring about the invasion of Ukraine, and had his dog bite two different people. But, according to the president, it's just not enough. 

More seriously, over at Instapundit, Ed Driscoll writes that

Smugness is the left’s Kryptonite in the hands of Trump, but it’s such an ingrained part of their psyche that it may be impossible for them to ever change. QED:

Finding comfort in the notion that their former allies were disdainful, hapless rubes, smug liberals created a culture animated by that contempt. The result is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

—“The Smug Style In American Liberalism,” young adult Website* Vox.com, April 21st, 2016.

* Classical reference.


Update: Great minds think alike
Ted Cruz: Joe Biden's Final 'Screw You' to a Majority of Americans

The Tony Kinnett Cast
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Tx, joins the Tony Kinnett Cast to talk about the final days of the Biden administration and what unpopular policy changes President Biden is making before he leaves office, for good.

Update 2: Glenn Reynolds on Why the left keeps smearing its political rivals as Hitlers or Mussolinis

Want to be Hitler? You don’t have to hate Jews, invade Poland or grow a silly mustache. There’s only one thing you have to do: Win an election against the left, or even look like you might.

We’ve seen that for years, of course. Democrats have likened every GOP presidential candidate back to Tom Dewey to the Austrian corporal.

[In the past,] If you lost an election, that meant you weren’t doing what the people wanted. It was time to take stock, adjust your positions and try again next time while serving as the loyal opposition in the meantime.

Now any election the left loses is treated as an existential struggle, the equivalent of war. And all’s fair in war. Calling your opponents Nazis justifies whatever you want to do to them, and makes you the good guy when you do it.

Le Porte-Parole du Comité Trump France sur Sud Radio : USA et Gaza au menu

Vendredi Sud Radio a réalisé une émission intitulée À J-3, Donald Trump est-il prêt à retourner à la Maison Blanche ? Parmi les invités était Philippe Karsenty, porte-parole du Comité Trump France (21:42-40:12).

Jan 17, 2025 #SudRadio #POULIN_SANS_RESERVE Avec Pierre-Guillaume Mercadal, agriculteur et éleveur de cochons laineux dans le Tarn et Garonne, Philippe Karsenty, Régis Le Sommier, reporter de guerre, directeur de la redaction de Omerta, auteur de "Quand négocie-t-on avec le diable ?" ed. Max Milo Retrouvez Alexis Poulin sans réserve tous les vendredis de 12h à 13h sur #SudRadio.

Sunday, January 12, 2025

Pastor Artur Pawlowski: "If you want to win, you must fight the Polish way: I call it 'the head-on collision'"

If you want to win, you must fight the Polish way: I call it "the head-on collision" (laughter). You don't shy away from a fight. Because you have already won. The only thing God wants is for you to show up. That's all. (24:48)

Remember the Canadian pastor who stood up against the authorities (i.e., Justin Trudeau's authorities) during COVID and who was harassed for months (years?) until he was unceremoniously arrested in Calgary while driving "on a rainy highway in what resembled a circus act"

Well, Artur Pawlowski has written a book (dziękuję to Valerie Pinkney) called Lions Do Not Bow (The Unbreakable Courage of Canada's Pastor), which hit the bookstands a week after America's 2024 election.

He also appeared on The Lance Wallnau Show:

Artur Pawlowski’s Stand for Religious Freedom: A Story of Courage Pastor Artur Pawlowski shares his inspiring story of defying government overreach during COVID lockdowns, from casting out police to organizing banned Christmas celebrations. His powerful message calls Christians to boldly live out their convictions, even when facing steep costs. If you're ready to ignite your faith and stand firm in your beliefs, this episode will equip you with the courage to face any challenge. 

Podcast Episode 1461: Artur Pawlowski’s Stand for Religious Freedom: A Story of Courage  lancewallnau.com/podcast

Saturday, January 11, 2025

Imagine had the California fires at these magnitudes happened just prior to the November election


Imagine had these fires at these magnitudes happened just prior to the November election. Steve Garvey would be the brandy-new senator for California and Adam Schiff would be peddling his memoir in paperback on Reliable Sources.
What boggles about LA is THEY KNEW, THEY'VE KNOWN for decades. Yet the politicians crossed their fingers and spent money on everything, EVERYTHING, but robust fire prevention policy. Instead the yearly predictable wildfires became a plus because wildfires were a soapbox for KA-limate change.

Adding a two-minute VDH synopsis (“A DEI Green New Deal hydrogen bomb”) "of all that the LA wildfires have made manifest", Damian Bennett finds the situation hard to comprehend: "LA is like a Rembrandt stored in the petrol shed where Aunt Jill goes to sneak a smoke."

Los Angeles is some of the most expensive, most exclusive, most coveted real estate in the country world. Surely such a treasure -- a redoubt of the rich, the famous, the powerful; an economic power unto itself -- surely it has attracted the most capable leaders and managers and public overseers. Surely. Surely its politics are fine-tuned and shaped to serve the public trust and ensure the community's prosperity and safety. Surely. 

The politics of showing up...
The politics of the message...
The politics of stewardship...
The politics of where the buck stops...
The politics of politics...
To think, KA-mala was the dodge!


The perdurance of bad politics and bad policies relies on entrenchment and luck. California has just run out of luck. The wildfires today destroying LA were always there waiting to happen, only held back by the hand of Providence. Ah, but Providence has withdrawn its hand. The Q now becomes, will the wildfires also destroy the careers of the entrenched politicians and bad stewards? 

Sometimes enough is 'enough', sometimes it is 'too much' or 'no more', and sometimes it notches up to 'WHOA! You have now F*CKED the wrong dog!'

Friday, January 10, 2025

The Systematic Destruction of Denmark's Military Over 30 Years: "Ships that cannot sail; Planes that cannot fly; And cannons that cannot fire — Everything is missing"


Unfortunately for Denmark, the kingdom's position in relation to Donald Trump and Greenland is unlikely to be improved by the book that was published last November, Defenceless (When the Biggest Threat Comes From Within). (Mange tak for the Instalink, Sarah.)

Sjællandske Nyheder has spoken with Peter Ernstved Rasmussen:

Editor and founder of the online media OLFI, the former reserve officer in the Danish Life Guard, Peter Ernstved Rasmussen, is known as a man who dares to speak out. Especially when it comes to the contents of his heart, Denmark's defense.

And there is little doubt that he does that in ‘FORSVARSLØS - Når den største trussel kommer indefra’, published by Lindhardt & Ringhof. 

The subject of the book is what Peter Erntsved Rasmussen calls the systematic destruction of the kingdon's Defense for more than 30 years.

"Today it consists of ships that cannot sail. Planes that cannot fly. And cannons that cannot fire. Everything is missing, from soldiers, air defense, artillery, anti-aircraft defense, submarines, tanks, night combat equipment, weapons, ammunition, radios, and binoculars to things as banal as socks, notebooks, and printer paper," he writes in a press release, where he also addresses who is to blame for the Armed Forces' miserable condition.

"The book describes a national tragedy that could only be made possible because successive prime ministers, finance ministers, defense ministers, department heads, defense chiefs and top officers lied with open eyes, manipulated and withheld the truth about the state of the Armed Forces — and at the same time tried to convince the population that we had the world's best defense."

 … [Incidentally, the film 'The Post' about the Pentagon Papers] has many parallels to the situation in the Danish defense and to the book 'FORSVARSLØS', adds Peter Ernstved Rasmussen.

Moving away from "barracks in disrepair" and more specifically to the Kalaallit Nunaat situation, the founder of OLFI seems sympathetic to Donald Trump, as he writes that Denmark Has Been Snoring Deeply Regarding Greenland

The Danish government is in a state of disarray. Instead of bringing the relationship with Greenland into balance, successive governments have continued the overlord mentality. It is with good reason that the Greenlanders feel provoked. So does the United States, because we have never wanted to take security seriously. Now the bill is coming, and it will be expensive.
More details about Greenland and its Viking history here

Tuesday, January 07, 2025

RIP the Peter of Peter, Paul, 'n' Mary


RIP Peter Yarrow of Peter, Paul, and Mary, whose hits included of Blowin' in the Wind

I still like groups like the trio and, say, the Weavers, even though I do remember an Ed Driscoll post from nine years ago which explained that the folk music movement was largely fake 'n' artificial 'n' manufactured (not to mention… Stalinist)…

David P. Goldman on folk music

We Americans are not a “folk,” not in the sense that Johann Gottfried Herder used the term. We do not have the deep memory of autochthonous roots that characterizes European cultures, the hand-me-downs of long-lost pagan experience. We are a people self-created by religious and political impulse. We have a distinct culture, but it is a self-created culture, a riff on Pilgrim’s Progress

 … We are not a folk but a church, and our native music is church music–the Battle Hymn with its quotation of Isaiah 63, for example, or “The Year of Jubilo,” whose hymnal roots I analyzed here. Our popular poetic language is that of our national epic, the King James Bible. We sang the go-to-meeting songs of the Methodists and other Protestant denominations. This informed the spirituals of black slaves who gave us our first original art form. American folk music? Gospel is as close as we get to such a concept.

 … What passed for “folk music” in the 1940s and 1950s, by contrast, was the remnant of English ballad preserved in isolated Appalachian communities, as rediscovered by musicologists. Joan Baez made a specialty of such things. John and Alan Lomax gathered Appalachian music, African-American music, and other scraps and shards distant from the American mainstream as an expression of authentic “folk” culture. The entire “folk” movement was Stalinist through and through (including Woody Guthrie, who was a Communist Party hanger-on and probably a member. … ).

Of course, it was all a put-on. Woody Guthrie was a middle-class lawyer’s son. Pete Seeger was the privileged child of classical musicians who decamped to Greenwich Village. The authenticity of the folk movement stank of greasepaint. But a generation of middle-class kids who, like Holden Caulfield, thought their parents “phony” gravitated to the folk movement. In 1957, Seeger was drunk and playing for pittances at Communist Party gatherings; that’s where I first met him, red nose and all. By the early 1960s he was a star again.

To [Bob] Dylan’s credit, he knew it was a scam, and spent the first part of his career playing with our heads.

"A network of small complicated rules": Alexis de Tocqueville Predicted the Kind of Tyranny Modern Democratic Nations Would Face

The type of tyranny that Alexis de Tocqueville warned about (video) two centuries ago is right on the spot, according to (merci à Duncan Hill), which goes on to point out out that it describes today's "bureaucratic nightmares." The video quote from Democracy in America comes (in bold) in the third paragraph below:

“Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications and to watch over their fate. That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks, on the contrary, to keep them in perpetual childhood: it is well content that the people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing but rejoicing. For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances: what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?

Thus it every day renders the exercise of the free agency of man less useful and less frequent; it circumscribes the will within a narrower range and gradually robs a man of all the uses of himself. The principle of equality has prepared men for these things;it has predisposed men to endure them and often to look on them as benefits.

After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd.”

In that perspective, here is another Tocqueville quote that I like:

“Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom, socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.”

And another:

“It's not an endlessly expanding list of rights — the 'right' to education, the 'right' to health care, the 'right' to food and housing. That's not freedom, that's dependency. Those aren't rights, those are the rations of slavery — hay and a barn for human cattle.”  

Then there is this longish quote:

“What good does it do me, after all, if an ever-watchful authority keeps an eye out to ensure that my pleasures will be tranquil and races ahead of me to ward off all danger, sparing me the need even to think about such things, if that authority, even as it removes the smallest thorns from my path, is also absolute master of my liberty and my life; if it monopolizes vitality and existence to such a degree that when it languishes, everything around it must also languish; when it sleeps, everything must also sleep; and when it dies, everything must also perish?

There are some nations in Europe whose inhabitants think of themselves in a sense as colonists, indifferent to the fate of the place they live in. The greatest changes occur in their country without their cooperation. They are not even aware of precisely what has taken place. They suspect it; they have heard of the event by chance. More than that, they are unconcerned with the fortunes of their village, the safety of their streets, the fate of their church and its vestry. They think that such things have nothing to do with them, that they belong to a powerful stranger called “the government.” They enjoy these goods as tenants, without a sense of ownership, and never give a thought to how they might be improved. They are so divorced from their own interests that even when their own security and that of their children is finally compromised, they do not seek to avert the danger themselves but cross their arms and wait for the nation as a whole to come to their aid. Yet as utterly as they sacrifice their own free will, they are no fonder of obedience than anyone else. They submit, it is true, to the whims of a clerk, but no sooner is force removed than they are glad to defy the law as a defeated enemy. Thus one finds them ever wavering between servitude and license.

When a nation has reached this point, it must either change its laws and mores or perish, for the well of public virtue has run dry: in such a place one no longer finds citizens but only subjects.”

But my all-time favorite Tocqueville quote is the one I have used on several posts. It describes the Left's modus operandi and its fairy tales better than anything I have ever seen.

It is easier for the world to accept
a simple lie than a complex truth

— Alexis de Tocqueville