Monday, October 13, 2025

If you are not convinced that the left, septic with violent intent, is ready to discharge its contagion, then you are prime for the slaughter

The lefties need no particular excuse to behave horribly. The short answer is the lefties are losing, and they've nothing left but violence. The left has exited the confines of politics and enters the wide open spaces of psychopathy, of mental illness as a practice, as a weapon of choice.  

Thus speaks Damian Bennett, who goes on to qualify his words:

I think the Trump administration has it largely right: stigmatize, arrest, and prosecute criminal mobs and freelance goons and assassins; uncover, cut off, and confiscate insurrectionist financing, prosecute and bankrupt the financiers; deploy the military to restore order, maintain the peace, and protect the citizenry; continue undeterred with the federal enforcement of immigration law.

That said, it needs to be recognized that the left is ready to spill blood, has openly announced it is eager to spill blood, has already spilt blood, and is preparing to scale up. I don't think these contemporary 'revolutionaries' can compare to the mettle or convictions of the Confederate secessionists. The Dark Powers are generaling an army of pretenders, of poseurs, of cowards who mob together to hide themselves. Once the left makes it move, if it is correctly, forcibly dealt with, it will crumple like a cheap suit slipping the clothes peg. What they will find themselves up against is not just the Trump administration but a populace ready to defend hearth, family, community. The left has no principles, no clear idea what it is about. It is like a cut snake, writhing, striking at everything. Cut off the head and the tail stops twisting.

The left is readying a tactical shift; it cannot combat the government directly and win. It will granulate its forces and take its fight to where it will leave a mark -- to your community, your church, your home, to you. Sooner or later the fight will come for you. I only argue to be prepared.

Those are the stirring words of Damian Bennett. Observing the world around him, he adds as follows:  

The World Is Off Its Nut. Laugh Or Cry?

Some days laugh...
...other days cry...
...then there are days when there are no laughs and tears run dry:
There are no tears left to cry. If you are not convinced that the left, septic with violent intent, is ready to discharge its contagion, then you are prime for the slaughter. The Democrats have edged beyond rhetorical violence into seditious actual violence. They have lost at the ballot. They are losing on the issues. They are losing in the polls. All this losing makes for their moment. They will take back all the prizes lost. By violence. It's coming. [Shakes head.] No. No, it's here.
The list goes on, by which is meant it is evergoing. It will go on until you and I are cowed or culled. What the left really wants is returned-violence to produce a few PR martyrs of their own to mask the murders they've committed and provide cover for murders-in-waiting they're wanting to commit. Of course they don't want too much returned-violence or too many martyrs, just enough for headlines and songs and tee-shirts and posters and swag and props for their cosplay 'revolution'. The pretend 'revolutionaries' are not serious people. They are not heroic. They lack the mettle to die on the barricades (oh, and this sniveler). However, until their threats are forcefully dealt with, they remain deadly dangerous.

Something radical is needed. There is not the luxury of waiting them out 40-50 years to expire or self-extinguish or debauch-to-death. What is needed are the chthonic Erinyes come calling.

Indeed, Damian Bennett brings an update: 

Laugh...

The process for Mullally was an 11-month marathon presided over by a committee of some 20 people chaired by the former director-general of MI5, Britain’s domestic spy agency. ... There was no published shortlist of candidates, nor an open vote. It was more a slow process of sounding out various interest groups to figure out which of the current bishops might be able to lead the church forward.

...or cry?

 Duncan Hill reacts:

I thought I understood the purpose of the Church in society. But, according to this article...

“The new archbishop will be faced with declining church attendance, bloated management structures and clergy squabbling over what people do in the bedroom,”

What happened to being the spiritual guide for God's children?

And to allow the desecration of the hallowed walls is tantamount to using the Cathedral for a toilet.

Shame on the clergy for allowing the decline of religion into irrelevance. And then they wonder why attendance is falling.

As an Episcopalian, I have always felt separate from the Church of England although I recognized the greater Anglican Communion. So the decline this article relates isn't as personal to me as the nonsense coming out of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in NYC. Nevertheless, I hate to see the decline of religion anywhere.

No more than a few days ago, I read that the Church still has humility and contrition, unfortunately what it is totally lacking in these days is faith. In any case, Damian Bennett replies to Duncan as follows, adding the image at the top of this post: 

Ah, well, I would welcome a decline, a greater decline, a decline to zero in Islam. Or does that beg the Q, is Islam a religion at all? I think it resembles more a small tent revival militarized and gone transnational. Most religions can coexist, Islam cannot. Predation and oppression are baked into its mission.

What I find distressing in the elevation of Sarah Mullally is that her appointment was market tested. Does the COE no longer take its cues from the Holy Ghost? In this, I am forever old school.

No comments: