Sunday, September 05, 2004
The Same Passion for Journalism and…
Saturday, September 04, 2004
Perhaps the French Should Have Taken Notice of a Speech in Favor of George W Bush By a… Democrat Senator
Not only might the French do well to heed some of the words in the speech, they — the very same people who have been predicting a Kerry victory in November — should make a careful note that the speaker is a member of the opposition party, and that this Democrat is in no mood to throw his support in the direction of John Kerry.
…like you, I ask which leader is it today that has the vision, the willpower and, yes, the backbone to best protect my family?Might it be that the comparison with Wendell Wilkie applies as much to opposition figures (like John Kerry) as it does to allied nations (like France)? In that perspective, it should perhaps be noted Willkie never complained that "FDR should allow me to disagree with him" and "FDR shouldn't ask me to be his vassal"…
The clear answer to that question has placed me in this hall with you tonight. For my family is more important than my party.
There is but one man to whom I am willing to entrust their future and that man's name is George Bush.
In the summer of 1940, I was an 8-year-old boy living in a remote little Appalachian valley. Our country was not yet at war, but even we children knew that there were some crazy men across the ocean who would kill us if they could.
President Roosevelt, in his speech that summer, told America "all private plans, all private lives, have been in a sense repealed by an overriding public danger."
In 1940, Wendell Wilkie was the Republican nominee.
And there is no better example of someone repealing their "private plans" than this good man. He gave Roosevelt the critical support he needed for a peacetime draft, an unpopular idea at the time.
And he made it clear that he would rather lose the election than make national security a partisan campaign issue.
Shortly before Wilkie died, he told a friend, that if he could write his own epitaph and had to choose between "here lies a president" or "here lies one who contributed to saving freedom," he would prefer the latter.
Where are such statesmen today?
Where is the bipartisanship in this country when we need it most?
…Time after time in our history, in the face of great danger, Democrats and Republicans worked together to ensure that freedom would not falter. But not today.
Motivated more by partisan politics than by national security, today's Democratic leaders see America as an occupier, not a liberator.
And nothing makes this Marine madder than someone calling American troops occupiers rather than liberators.
Tell that to the one-half of Europe that was freed because Franklin Roosevelt led an army of liberators, not occupiers.
Tell that to the lower half of the Korean Peninsula that is free because Dwight Eisenhower commanded an army of liberators, not occupiers.
Tell that to the half a billion men, women and children who are free today from the Baltics to the Crimea, from Poland to Siberia, because Ronald Reagan rebuilt a military of liberators, not occupiers.
Never in the history of the world has any soldier sacrificed more for the freedom and liberty of total strangers than the American soldier. And, our soldiers don't just give freedom abroad, they preserve it for us here at home.
For it has been said so truthfully that it is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us the freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech.
It is the soldier, not the agitator, who has given us the freedom to protest.
It is the soldier who salutes the flag, serves beneath the flag, whose coffin is draped by the flag, who gives that protester the freedom to abuse and burn that flag.
No one should dare to even think about being the Commander in Chief of this country if he doesn't believe with all his heart that our soldiers are liberators abroad and defenders of freedom at home.
But don't waste your breath telling that to the leaders of my party today. In their warped way of thinking America is the problem, not the solution.
They don't believe there is any real danger in the world except that which America brings upon itself through our clumsy and misguided foreign policy.
It is not their patriotism — it is their judgment that has been so sorely lacking. They claimed Carter's pacifism would lead to peace. [Jimmy Carter, of course, is a fellow Georgia Democrat of Zell Miller's.]
They were wrong.
They claimed Reagan's defense buildup would lead to war.
They were wrong.
…In this hour of danger our President has had the courage to stand up. And this Democrat is proud to stand up with him.
(Thanks to Gregory Schreiber)
Perhaps the French Should Pay More Attention to the Speeches at the Republican Convention
More than a year after falling out with the United States over the Iraq war, France is still a prime target for the rage of Republicans, who are not showing much amour for the longtime US ally.Might it be that France better wake up to the fact that the anger towards France is real, that America's sense of having been betrayed is real, and that, in general, when Americans talk, it is to say what they mean? Might it be that, before warning that a Frenchman might become angered by what he hears, that Frenchman should ask himself how the other person's words truly reflects how that other person feels (and thinks) and that sometimes, perhaps, the other person has more reason than he to be angry? That, of course, would be asking the French to cease having a (self-serving) viewpoint of Americans that allows them to castigate, ridicule, or (like here) minimize everything Americans say and do…
Democrat John Kerry may be enemy number one but France is a close number two at the chest-thumping Republican national convention, where the word Paris is code for weakness, indecision and international cooperation.
"Senator Kerry has made it clear that he would use military force only if approved by the United Nations," Senator Zell Miller said in a thundering address to the party faithful on Wednesday. "Kerry would let Paris decide when America needs defending. I want Bush to decide," [the Democrat senator (!)] said, drawing cheers from the crowd.
Throughout their four-day gala, Republicans have painted President George W. Bush as the man to trust for national security after September 11 — and Kerry [and, indirectly, France] as a dangerous appeaser.
They have ridiculed his recent talk about a more "sensitive" war on terror, hammered him for trying to vote both sides of issues in the Senate and lambasted his remarks at forging international consensus for US war plans.
"Senator Kerry denounces American action when other countries don't approve, as if the whole object of our foreign policy were to please a few persistent critics," Vice President Dick Cheney said in his speech Wednesday. "He talks about leading a more sensitive war on terror, as though Al-Qaeda will be impressed with our softer side," Cheney said.
But a delegation of half a dozen members of France's ruling Union for a Popular Movement (UMP), here to observe the convention, played down the repeated barbs at France.
"You can't take too seriously what you hear in a convention," said Phil[l]ipe Briand, a UMP member of the French parliament. "If you are a little sensitive, you come away somewhat angry," Briand said. "But if you know it's just part of the campaign, it's no big deal."
France helped lead opposition to the Iraq war on the UN Security Council, which set off an orgy of French-bashing nationwide last year.
…The connection between anti-French anger and Kerry's policy statements, which sometimes do not sound much different than what comes out of the French government, has been an easy one for critics to make.
"Just a few months ago, John Kerry kind of leaked out that claim that certain foreign leaders who opposed our removal of Saddam Hussein prefer him," former New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani told the convention this week.
"That raises the risk that he might well accommodate his position to their viewpoint," he said…
(Thanks to Gregory Schreiber)
Friday, September 03, 2004
| Religion of Pieces | Religion des Pets (car ça sent la merde) |
| 'Foreign' fighters are among the hostage takers in Beslan, Russia. Kill faster. Total war.
| Il y a des combattants 'étrangers' parmi les preneurs d'ôtages à Beslan en Russia. Tuer plus vite. Guerre totale.
|
| UPDATE: Children shot in the back and beaten with rifle butts.
| DERNIERES INFOS: On a tiré dans le dos des enfants et les a battus à coups de crosses.
|
| Lots of salad tossing going on | Une pluie de pétales de rose |
| The old streetwalker Marianne, in the person of Foreign Minister Bernier, his bashed-in backdoor so loose he could now easily let a TGV speed through, has been cuddling up to a host of bad boys looking for the ramrod that will make like an 'open sesame'.
| Cette vieille catin de Marianne, incarnée par le Ministre des Affaires Etrangères Barnier, dont la rondelle est tellement distendue qu'elle pourrait laisser passer un TGV à travers, fait des calins avec une flopée de voyous infréquentables en vue de tomber sur le braquemart qui fera office de 'sésame'.
|
Thursday, September 02, 2004
Rumors They'll be Freed Soon
Two French journalists who had been taken hostage in Iraq are no longer in the hands of their abductors, French Culture and Communications Minister Renaud Donnedieu de Vabres has said.They're not out of the woods yet so I'd prefer to refrain from speculation for the moment but should they be the only two to survive abduction and threatened execution at the hands of radical Sunni groups in Iraq then this will be a grand revelation about France's presence in the Middle East and its relation to transnational terrorism.
"We know that they are alive and no longer in the hands of the abductors who had held them," he told journalists on Thursday in Perpignan, southern France.
The editor of the French publication Le Figaro told Aljazeera that the hostages had been handed over to another group which supported their release.
| Now they can ask if they are still in their own country | Maintenant ils peuvent se poser la question 'Est-ce qu'on est toujours chez nous?' |
| France has the permission of Tariq Ramadan, Hamas, and Hezbollah to re-open their own schools. | La Fwance a obtenu, auprès de Tariq Ramadan, le Hamas, et le Hezbollah, l'autorisation de rouvrir leurs propres écoles. Les |
Wednesday, September 01, 2004
But… C'est Injuste! Don't They Realize that the Hostages Are French Friends!?
The Kidnappers of French Journalists Renew Their Blackmail…Wow. "Odious blackmail"! "Terrorists"! Quite different from the bland and straightforward headlines when Americans and other nationalities are kidnapped, huh?
Paris Tries to Isolate the Terrorists…
No rightfully angered locals here, no members of the "Iraqi rebellion", no "insurgents", no justification, no "executions", no "Ils l'ont bien mérité" (they deserved it, they had it coming)… Au contraire! Au contraire, as it turns out…
Take a look at Paris Tries to Isolate the Terrorists By Orchestrating Arab Disapproval:
"Maybe [Christian Chesnot and Georges Malbrunot] were kidnapped by mistake [wonders Malbrunot's editor.] Maybe the kidnappers didn't know they were journalists and French citizens."Is this supposed to mean that it is, perhaps not normal, but to be expected that Americans and other nationalities should be kidnapped (and beheaded)? No mistakes, in those cases? They asked for it, they deserved it? D'accorrrdd…
In her article, Mouna Naïm writes that
France, all as one — the government, media outlets, and public opinion — was convinced that no harm would befall the kidnapped due to the "soundness" of French policy with regards to the Arab world, in general, and of Iraq, in particularNote how the independent newspaper neatly absolves the politicians from any excessive load of responsability ("la France toute entière"). Some criticism follows, but it is relatively low-key, and it has been neatly deflected.
the idea was to attempt to isolate [the kidnappers], to ask the greatest number of authorities of all types [what is that supposed to mean?!] to distance themselves from the kidnapping, to make the hostagetakers understand their total isolation in order to make them give in.Of course, if "America's number one friend" does have this capacity, one wonders if, out of pure friendship for Uncle Sam, she might not have tried to use her influence in other kidnappings.
From the Arab League's secretary general … to Al Jazeera television … and Hezbollah television, along with a twice-sounded call from Palestinian president Yasser Arafat, condemnation was unanimous. Journalism unions, party leaders, Arab dailies [and Muslim religious authorities] joined in the chorus, some of whom underlined France's "sympathy" for "Arab causes", others the harm that the kidnappings and threats were doing to Islam and to Muslims in general.Meanwhile, Jordan's Al-Diyar daily opines that
One of the main leaders of the Palestinian radical movement, Islamic Jihad, called on the kidnappers to free their hostages who "are friends of the Palestinian people and have visted Palestine several times". [Mohammed Al-Hindi added that] "the issue of the veil cannot be resolved in that manner, especially since France's position on the American occupation of Iraq has set it apart from that of other Europeans."
In "the interest of Islam" Yasser Al-Serri, director of the London-based Islamic Observatory, the institution which defends [sic] Muslims in the entire world and commands a certain notoriety with Islamists, demanded the liberation of the two journalists "who, through their work, are helping to denounce the American crimes in Irak".
France remains the European country which sympathizes the most with Arab causes, which it supports, particularly in Palestine and Iraq.On the media page, our old friend Dominique "Europe needs an enemy and it should be the United States" Dhombres is back from vacation, and he waxes carefully, very carefully about the kidnapping, ending his chronicle with an admiring nod to Al-Jazeera
which took an official stand [for the men's release], which is a first.How impressive! As usual, the lucid French understand when there is a need for admiration (and when there is not) and who is deserving of admiration (and who is not).
Oh, but wait a minute. It would seem that there is a slight hiccup in the lavish (self-)praise. There is one Muslim leader who, although he has joined in the calling for the release of the hostages, has not joined in lauding France for its support for Arab causes, notably against "the American occupation in Iraq".
Who might he be, I wonder? Oh, he just happens to be the president of Iraq… of course, he just happens to be among the Muslims most concerned by America's presence in Iraq. Is he a stooge, maybe? Well, it just so happens that among the wealth of Arab and Muslim voices calling for the hostages' release due to France's sympathetic leanings and to its righteous position on Iraq, there is not one Iraqi quoted. Not one!
Iyad Allawi was interviewed by Cécile Hennion and five other newspapers the previous day, declaring that the kidnapping of the Frenchmen showed that there was "no possible neutrality" in Iraq and that those who do not fight at the government level can not escape terrorism. "None of the civilized countries can escape," he said, noting "there is no possible neutrality, as shows the kidnapping of the French journalists." "The French deluded themselves if they would hope to stay outside".
And so, returning to the chorus of support on the newspaper's second page, it turns out that it is a bit spoiled by a filler in which the French foreign ministry declares that the words of Mr Allawi are "unacceptable".
"Those declarations of his seem to throw doubt on France's determination in the fight against terrorism [declared the Quai d'Orsay,] France is untiringly leading a resolute action against this scourge and it has always brought its support and its contribution to all of the international community's initiatives in the area"Except when it comes to using its great influence to try to help bring about the release of the kidnapped nationals of its "allies" (see above).
(Kind of reminds you of Le Monde's editorial calling the doubts about Spanish courage in the wake of the Madrid bombings "a scornful theory", doesn't it? It seems like the French, who proffer intellectual "openness" when it comes to wondering whether America's D-Day landings amounted to a liberation or an occupation, are hardly so open-minded when it comes to putting into doubt their own intentions, or those of their allies.)
Allawi, of course, is the man that the independent newspaper has mocked, dismissed as a CIA stooge, and compared to a mafioso (a scorn Le Monde has never reserved for the above-mentioned authorities "of all types"). That scorn has been absent in the past couple of days; the French seem to be a lot more timid and circumspect when their own citizens' lives are at stake.
Meanwhile, (live) from New York, Patrick Jarreau brings us news of the Republican Convention, notably the opening speeches of John McCain and Rudolph Giuliani. John Kerry bragged that he had the support of foreign leaders, said New York's former mayor, the very same "who opposed the ouster of Saddam Hussein".
"Our choice wasn't between a benign status quo and the bloodshed of war," Le Monde quotes the Arizona senator as saying. "It was between war and a graver threat. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Not our critics abroad. Not our political opponents. And certainly not a disingenuous filmmaker." Many of those "who criticize military action", he added, were "ready to do business" with Saddam Hussein. (Some of the above quotes were translated back to English from Le Monde's own French translation.)
Now isn't that strange? These are references to France and the rest of the "peace camp" members, but the independent newspaper — which usually loves to explain the nuances of politicians' speeches and what they left unsaid — refrains from doing so in this case. And that, although it would help to explain why there were no Iraqis to quote from among the chorus of Muslim fawners-for-France. Bizarre, n'est-ce pas?
| Hatred as a form of foreign policy | La haine en guise de politique étrangère |
Tuesday, August 31, 2004
France Rebuts al-Allawi
PARIS (Reuters) - France criticized Iraq's interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi Monday for saying states which did not actively fight terrorists would become their targets, after two Frenchmen were kidnapped in Iraq.Note that the interview in Le Monde was actually given to a pool of papers including WaPo, the Times (London), the LA Times, Knight-Ridder and Corriere della sera. But also note that... argh!!... yet AGAIN!... they've misspelled an English word from the US: it's Knight-Ridder, folks, an enormous and prestigious newspaper company any competent news organization familiar with the US ought to know well. Le Monde spells it Knight-Readers...
Allawi's comments in Le Monde daily came as France raced against the clock to secure the release of two French journalists kidnapped in Iraq by militants who told Paris to drop its ban on Muslim headscarves in schools by Monday evening.
"The French, like all democratic countries, cannot let themselves be satisfied with adopting a passive position," Allawi told Le Monde in an interview.
"Governments that decide to stay on the defensive will be the next terrorist targets," Allawi said.
"Let me tell you that the French, despite all the noise they are making, (such as) 'We don't want war', will soon have to fight against terrorists," he said, adding that future attacks could happen in French cities as well as in the United States.
The French government, which led the opposition to the U.S.-led war in Iraq, called his comments unacceptable.
"These declarations seem, in effect, to cast doubt on France's determination in the fight against terrorism," the Foreign Ministry said in a statement, adding France had called for a political solution in Iraq since the start of the crisis.
"The French authorities have, for a long time, affirmed the necessity and urgency to mobilize against all forms of terrorism. France, which has itself been a victim of terrorist attacks, leads unrelentingly a determined action against this plague," the ministry said.
| Yesterday, the kidnappers prolonged deadline 24 hours | Hier, les preneurs d'ôtage ont prolongé le délai de 24 heures |
| Guess Barnier gives good head.
| Paraît que Barnier suce bien.
|
Inside Job
The alleged perpetrator of an arson that destroyed a Jewish center in Paris in the night of August 21 to 22 has been arrested.Pro-Palestinian group CAPJPO (Coordination of Calls of a Just Peace in the Middle East) and the new party Euro-Palestine jointly react with predictable glee on the anti-globalization Web site Bella Ciao:
The police have not revealed his name. According to a police source, the man is a Jewish former employee of the center, aged about fifty years.
Jewish Social Center: CRIF, Media and Government Fall Yet Again into the Same Trap
[...] No new details had been published by midday, particularly as regards the motives for this newest specimen of Jewish anti-Semitism. It will be some time before we learn whether the individual arrested was inspired by Marie L. (the fabulator of the RER D who's been watching a little too much TV), by "Phineas" (the man who desecrated a Jewish cemetery when he found that having attacked an Arab with an axe didn't make front page news), or perhaps by Alexandre Moïse, leader of the Zionist Federation of France who was nabbed several months ago for having lodged a complaint for anti-Jewish threats... of which he was himself the author.
[...]
The French government, along with the highly visible support of one of the opposition's highest-ranking members, Paris mayor Delanoë, found a away to add an even greater degree of ignominy in the rue Popincourt matter.
It rolled out the red carpet for the Israeli minister of foreign affairs, Sylvain Shalom, who demanded to come to Paris the moment he learned of the fire in order to pose as the guardian and protector of the interests of French Jews. Shalom distinguished himself by, among other things, criticizing the supposed laxity of French courts in prosecuting the perpetrators of anti-Semitic acts, which constitutes yet another shameless lie.
Like anti-Semitism itself, blackmailing others with accusations of anti-Semitism is a criminal madness, with the aggravating factor that it follows itself a calculating strategy: to prevent the expression of any and all denunciation of the acts of the Israeli government in occupied Palestine.
In addition to the arsonist of the rue Popincourt, let's hope that all those, from the French pro-Israeli institutions (CRIF, LICRA, etc.) to political class and including the sheep-like media, who have created an environment favorable for such acts, shall one day have to explain themselves.
"250,000 Versus 200; Any Questions?"
Check out Ray's photos
PS: When (s)he's hungry, what's a rabid
anti-corporate, anti-globalization militant to do?
| Doing the funky chicken | Gigoter comme un poulet bio |
| Foreign Affairs Minister Barnier is spreading his butt cheeks in every Arab country he can in an effort to free the French hostages and better explain the reasoning behind the headscarf law.
| Ministre des Affaires Etrangères Barnier offre sa rondelle aux quatre coins du monde arabe (mais il est piètre croupion) pour faire libérer les ôtages français et pour mieux expliquer le pourquoi et le comment de la loi sur le foulard.
|
| French TV in full Pravda mode | Télé franchouille turbine à la Pravda |
| LCI, French cable news channnel, showed the Kerry sisters on the MTV Music Awards with the booing edited out and an added commentary on how Kerry is coronated by American youth.
| LCI, a diffusé le passage des soeurs Kerry aux MTV Music Awards en supprimant les huées et en ajoutant un commentaire déclarannt que Kerry est plebiscité par la jeunesse américaine.
|
| Deep friendship? No longer. | Profonde amitié? C'est fini. |
| 27% of Americans view France as an enemy in the War on Terror. Only 18% view France as an ally. 48% say it is somewhere in between.
| 27% des américains considèrent que la France est un pays ennemi dans la guerre contre le terrorisme. Seulement 18% considèrent que la France est un pays allié. 48% considèrent qu'elle se situe quelque part entre les deux.
|
| Miserable failure | Echec lamentable |
| Globophobe vermin in retreat.
| La vermine globophobe régresse.
|
Monday, August 30, 2004
All the Brothers Were Valient…
Infiltrating New York's Anti-Bush Demonstration
Well Ray D is back at it again, heading into hostile territory, albeit on another continent. This time he waded through the canyons of the Big Apple, among a shrieking crowd of hundreds of thousands of anti-Bush demonstrators. Overcoming his fear and listening only to his sense of duty, the brave blogger managed to bring back some photos…
But … and here's the best part … it turned out that he was not alone…
From this day to the ending of the world,
but you in it shall be remembered —
You few, you happy few, you band of brothers…
And gentlemen in Europe now abed
shall think themselves accurst they were not here...
"America Has Lost Its Soul"?
Again? What Is It This Time?!
Certainly, there is not much to defend about the team, but listen to how Alain Giraudo ends his chronicle on the front page of the special Olympic supplement (no link available at the time of this writing), and ask yourself if making comparisons with Buenos Aires's financial status (done in because of evil capitalism, naturellement) and evoking America's soul (once again) is not going slightly overboard.
According to the criteria of the IMF and the World Bank, Argentina is a country in a severe bankrupt state. According to our criteria [whose? those of all Frenchmen?], the United States is a country that has lost its basketball shoes [a French expression meaning to lose one's head or one's grip] and therefore its soul.
| Islam in France is a huge joke! | L'Islam de France est une vaste plaisanterie! |
| Authors explain how Islam in France is nothing more than a Green fascism driven by outside forces.
| Les auteurs expliquent pourquoi l'Islam en France n'est qu'un fascisme vert piloté par des forces extérieures.
|
Lionizing French Foreign Policy While Demonizing That of Uncle Sam
It is indispensable that the international community assumes its responsibilities. That it admits to the disastrous results of its lack of action.Just in case you didn't realize whom Jacques Chirac was referring to when he mentioned "the international community" in regards to the Iraqi situation, Le Monde is helpful enough to provide the translation: "the international community" is a referral to… the United States. Yes, you read that right, what Uncle Sam is guilty of in Iraq — unlike, presumably, the members of the "peace camp" — is "lack of action".
There is not a single word of doubt thereabout in the rest of the article devoted to the French president's speech to the French ambassadors' annual meeting home in Paris, which, instead, is lionized, as usual, by Le Monde's Claire Tréan, who goes on to explain the lucidity and the reasoning in every point in Chirac's speech.
(The previous day, the ambassadors had listened to a speech by France's new foreign minister, in which he not once mentioned the United States, Russia, NATO, Israel, Palestinian, the trans-Atlantic alliance, or September 11. This led the New York Times' Elaine Sciolino to note one ambassador calling Michel Barnier "the anti-de Villepin". ['Mr. de Villepin seemed determined to revive the historic greatness of France. He has a romantic view articulated in his book on Napoleon, "The Hundred Days," that describes the emperor's philosophy as "Victory or death, but glory whatever happens".'] Don't expect a low-spoken foreign minister to be fundamentally any different than his predecessors, though.)
Meanwhile, the independent newspaper sports an article on the man who invented Bush, in which Patrick Jarreau refers, in the first three paragraphs alone, to "that improbable president", to Karl Rove's "puppet", and (in the opening line) to the "fact" that "Nobody [!] believes that George Bush can have made it to the White House by his own means" (i.e., by his own mental prowess).
In the rest of the article concerning Karl Rove, it's the same usual negative-sounding and fear-inducing expressions about who really is "at the helm of the greatest power on the planet": The man "in the shadow of George Bush senior", "that string-puller", "that puppet displayer", "the man who is credited with as much intelligence as the man, to whom he is only officially the advisor, is credited with as little of", "the fundamentals of Karl Rove's job is propaganda and fund collecting by mail", "more a reactionary [the word of death in France] than a conservative", "Karl Rove is followed by a reputation as a trickster and a killer" (!).
He sincerely admires the man he helped to become the most powerful man of the United States, and whom he wants to turn into, in two months' time, a reelected president. In his eyes, George Walker Bush is the only Republican politician who can make his party stay durably in the White House.Immediately before that paragraph, however, Jarreau had written that Karl Rove
has never been accused of showing a lack of respect for his boss. He is too smart for that.In other words, someone as intelligent as Karl Rove (or "as us Europeans"?) can only be too aware that Dubya is nothing but a doofus. But he will not say so. I.e., he is an American who is dishonest and untrustworthy (a liar?). Aren't they all?
Still, Jarreau states that to Rove, George Walker Bush is the only republican politician who can make his party endure in the White House. The question that is never asked in this article (the most popular among visitors to Le Monde's website), is if Rove does not truly admire W, and if he truly believes W is such an ignorant bonehead, why doesn't (why didn't) the macchiavellian strategist he is simply settle on a far more intelligent politician in the first place? (Jeb Bush and John McCain come to mind, but surely even an intelligent nobody must make a more attractive solution than the former's big brother.) Surely that would be the simpler solution?
There is no explanation of this. No explanation but the usual fare in French media and in French society: (Most) Americans are ignorant simpletons, incapable of holding a rational thought, or else, they, or their leaders (or the people in the latters' shadows), are dishonest liars.
Meanwhile, the paper's front page sports a Jarreau headline explaining that Christian extremists are on the campaign trail for Bush, while Henri Tincq castigates the evangelists' cocktail of conservatism, patriotism, and religious fervor and sociologist Todd Gitlin tells Corine Lesnes that we are haunted by the fear that Bush might capitalize on any violence. As for Le Monde's editorial [another website favorite], it skewers Bush's "biblical vision of the world" and snorts in disgust at the "people chosen by God", noting that the planet's fundamentalisms (such as Hindu nationalism and Islamism) "are sometimes fed by the aggressivity of Christian groups linked to evangelical or Baptist churches from North America" (good to know who, fundamentally [sic], is the guilty party). "This vision of religion must be denounced".
And so… it's time — again! — for someone as lucid and intelligent (and secular) as Chirac to call on the simple-minded Americans "to assume their responsibilities" and "admit to the disastrous results of their lack of action". Quite convenient, n'est-ce pas?
Update: Following the historic Iraq election, President Ghazi al-Yawer derides one of the central tenets of French foreign policy as "complete nonsense"…
| That's why you are in this mess, dickhead | C'est la raison pour laquelle tu te trouves dans ce bazar, ducon |
| 'France has always refused the view of a clash between the West and Islam.', Michel Barnier, French Foreign Minister, licking the nutsack of the Islamic Brotherhood in Egypt.
| 'La France a toujours récusé la vision d'un choc entre l'Occident et l'islam.', Michel Barnier, Ministre des Affaires Etrangères de la Fwance, en train de faire une gâterie aux Frerots Islamiques en Egypte.
|
Sunday, August 29, 2004
Vunce und Vor All?! Aber, Fritz!…
| Religion of Pieces to French journalists: Welcome to the World | Religion des Pets (car ça sent la merde) aux journalistes franchouilles: On va vous faire aimer l'an 2000 |
| Clash of Civilisations: French TV calls the terrorist kidnappers 'activists'. Marianne offers her backdoor, but her shit is tired.
| Choc des Civilisations: La télé franchouille appelle les ravisseurs terroristes des 'activistes'. Marianne offre sa rondelle, mais elle est piètre croupion.
|
| UPDATE: Ripoublika Franska government claims that French muslims unanimously condemn the kidnappings. Young French Muslims say that the Mossad-did-it.
| DERNIERES INFOS: Le gouvernement de la Ripoublika Franska déclare que tous les musulmans français condamnent à l'unaminité ces enlèvements. Jeunes musulmans français déclarent que le Mossad-l'a-fait.
|
A Locke on Sound Reasoning
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.An excellent man, like precious metal, is in every way invariable; A villain, like the beams of a balance, is always varying, upwards and downwards.
Education begins the gentleman, but reading, good company and reflection must finish him.
Fortitude is the guard and support of the other virtues.
| Don't let it go to your head, guys | Hé les mecs, faut surtout pas avoir la grosse tête |
| 'Islamic Army in Iraq' tells French journalists, 'You ought to be in pictures'.
| 'l'Armée islamique en Irak' offre aux journalistes franchouilles une carrière cinématographique.
|
| Head scarves and shrouds | Voiles islamiques et linceuls |
| And they are still punching above their weight. France finds its proper place in the Clash of Civilisations. Look for bomb belts in Sarcelles very soon now.
| Des poids coq qui essaient encore de monter chez les poids lourds. La France trouve sa juste place dans le Choc des Civilisations. Il y aura des ceintures d'explosifs à Sarcelles sous peu.
|
Saturday, August 28, 2004
"As soon as you trust yourself, you will know how to live."
Divide and rule, a sound motto. Unite and lead, a better one.and
How can you come to know yourself? Never by thinking, always by doing. Try to do your duty, and you'll know right away what you amount to.
Friday, August 27, 2004
| It's a quagmire | C'est un bourbier |
| Quagmire for the French candidate. Quagmire for France. Thanks to Holly.
| Le candidat franchouille est dans un bourbier. La France est dans un bourbier aussi. Merci à Holly.
|
| Nothing to do with those no-income madrassas ringing France's cities | Rien à voir avec les madrassas pompes aux allocs qui encerclent les villes fwançaises |
| Doubling of anti-Semitic attacks in France. Reasons unclear.
| Depuis un an le nombre d'attaques antisémites en France a doublé. Les causes restent non élucidées.
|
| UPDATE: Allah comments.
| DERNIERES INFOS: Allah en parle.
|
What Does the Liberation of Paris Celebrate?
| Globophobes: dumbest leftists in the world | Globophobes: la gôche la plus bête du monde |
| The small-time thugs at ATTAC are starting to feed on each other. Probably tastes better than the bio crap that José Bové©® slings at 'em. The time comes when these shitheels have to go back to their desks. Just a bunch of techno-yuppies forever unfulfilled by their dog's life at the PR firm.
| Les petites frappes chez ATTAC commencent à se bouffer entre eux. Peut-être bien que ça a meilleur goût que la merdouille bio fourguée par José Bové©®. Arrive le temps où ces étrons rentrent tous derrière leurs bureaux. Ils ne savent que jouer aux têknos-bobos éternellement insatisfaits de leurs vies de bourriques dans leurs boîtes de com'.
|
Thursday, August 26, 2004
Does America's Electoral-Vote System Reflect a Lack of Democracy, Something That Is Better Provided For By European-Type Popular Voting?
In that case, a newspaper would do well to publish a translation of George Will's Newsweek article. But… don't bet on it.
(Thanks to the Ashbrook Center)
(Read also Paul Greenberg's point of view
[Merci à Gregory Schreiber])
Is Bush the Better Peace-With-Europe Candidate?
…the extent to which this anybody-but-Bush syndrome thrives in Europe should not be exaggerated. It is not universal, and Bush can count more statesmen than Tony Blair as friends and allies in Europe. Nor should the older, more generic, less Bush-specific anti-American sentiments of Europeans—though these are strong and durable—be seen as unqualified and unchanging. Just as there are pessimistic, “European”-minded people in America, there are optimistic, “American”-minded people in Europe. Half of the twenty-five governments in the enlarged European Union have been part of the Coalition for Iraqi Freedom. President Chirac of France, who has recently been the source of many anti-American initiatives, is being stalked in his own party by an ambitious young rival for the presidency, Nicolas Sarkozy, who in interviews has been accused of having a soft spot for America. Chirac has also been losing ground in EU politics, where he has failed to get his candidates into high office, and where the French notion of constructing Europe as a "counterweight" or "adversary" to America is rejected as "stupid" by the incoming EU President (the Prime Minister of Portugal, José Manuel Barroso, who has lived and worked in the United States).
It is true that a Kerry victory might help get certain European governments—notably France and Germany—out of the hole they have dug themselves into by leading opposition to American policies in Iraq. (They were not, as they often claim, just offering advice to a friend; they were arrogantly insisting that their friend take that advice.) This helps explain the extent to which these countries are hoping that Bush will lose. But this could work the other way around, too: the re-election of Bush, by reaffirming America’s commitment to the policies it has adopted since September 2001, and thus its will to win the war with Islamofascism, could help change the policies and the personnel of these European governments. The Kerry alternative, indulging Europeans’ anti-Americanism by focusing on some of America’s many faults and mistakes, would be neither an effective nor a healthy way to encourage European-American unity.
…European commentators have recognized that such divisions between America and Europe will probably persist whoever wins the presidential election. More than five months ago, The Economist commented that "Mr Kerry might explain American views more tactfully than Mr Bush. He might even do it in French. But transatlantic tensions would endure." Americans should become more aware of this fact, and should not assume that electing Kerry would be a very effective way of easing tensions with Europe. Moreover, as we have seen, if they want to persuade more Europeans and their governments to support American foreign policy—insofar as such persuasion is possible—they should ask themselves whether a re-elected President Bush might be better placed to do that than a new President Kerry.
And Then There's the One About…
The White House began airing their TV commercials to reelect the president, and the John Kerry campaign is condemning his use of 9/11 in the ads. He said it is unconscionable to use the tragic memory of a war in order to get elected… unless of course, it's the Vietnam War.—Jay Leno
Start reading the 10 best John Kerry Jokes
Start reading the 100 best George W Bush jokes
| Il était d'humeur palestinienne
Comme Zizi Empeste, il va péter les plombs. |
| Dhimmified | Dhimmifiés |
| After siding with Nazis, the French are now siding with Saddam Hussein. The Saddamite French say the Saddam must not receive the death penalty. Today, | Suite à leur soutien aux Nazis, les franchouilles se mettent du côté du Saddam Hussein. Les fwançais saddamites déclare qu'il ne faut pas condamner Saddam à la peine capitale. Aujourd'hui, |
| The Iraqi Economy is stabilizing. Merchant: 'One kilo of tomatoes, some olive oil, some parsely ... That makes 3.50 hostages.'
|
|
| Hack writer | Ecrivain donbi |
| Another hysterical rich bitch on the rag. Interview picked up by Les Inrockuptibles this week.
| Encore une hystérique, pleine aux as, qui a ses règles. Cette interview est reprise cette semaine dans Les Inrockuptibles.
|
| Tariq's favorite drink is a Bloody Mary on the rocks | La chanson préférée de Tariq est 'Si j'avais un marteau' |
| Tariq Ramadam will not be able to teach 'Stoning Women 101' at Notre Dame.
| Tariq Ramadam ne va pas enseigner le cours 'Lapidation des femmes (4 UV)' à l'Université de Notre Dame.
|
US Plutonium to France... Maybe
Noting concerns that terrorists may attempt to influence the U.S. November elections through an attack, Democratic lawmakers this month have raised questions concerning the security of a planned shipment of more than 100 kilograms of plutonium to France.
The Energy Department is expected next month to ship 140 kilograms of plutonium to France to be converted into mixed-oxide fuel for use in testing at a U.S. nuclear power plant for possible future energy generation. The project is intended to help advance a U.S.-Russian nonproliferation program to eliminate a combined total of almost 70 tons of plutonium.
Antinuclear activists such as Greenpeace have long opposed the shipment, arguing that such transports could be vulnerable to terrorist attacks. To demonstrate, Greenpeace activists last year were able to stop and chain themselves to a truck carrying a plutonium shipment as it traveled from a site in northern France to a facility in the south. French activists have also posted online information on the time and location of three plutonium shipments that occurred over the last two weeks, Tom Clements of Greenpeace International said today.
In an Aug. 12 letter to Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham released Wednesday, Rep. Jim Turner, D-Texas, requested information on the department's efforts to ensure that the security of the plutonium shipment would be equal to that given to shipments of nuclear material conducted within the United States. Turner also requested information on how much control the United States would relinquish over the plutonium once it leaves the country, who would assume liability in the event of an accident and whether the recent elevation of the U.S. terrorist threat level influenced security preparations for the shipment.
"The consequences of the theft of this plutonium - - enough for over 20 nuclear weapons - - would be catastrophic," wrote Turner, the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on Homeland Security.
Wednesday, August 25, 2004
60 Years Ago Today
BBC Paris Correspondent Alan Little:
[...] the Paris uprising did not begin in earnest until the people of Paris could hear the guns of the approaching Americans in the west.
By the time the people took to the barricades, the approach of the Allies made liberation a near certainty.
What mattered was who should liberate.
There is not much doubt that Paris would have been liberated within days even if there had been no popular uprising.
But France needed a redeeming event to restore French pride, to wipe away the stain of 1940: the surrender, and the years of collaboration that followed.
The founding myth of Gaullist France was that France redeemed itself by liberating itself.
So the version of events that France celebrates this week is one in which the role of the Allies is almost invisible.
[...]
But just because the uprising was later mythologised, it does not mean the uprising was a myth.
In those 10 days, 1,600 died.
All over the city there are little stone plaques recording the places where resistance fighters fell in the 10-day uprising of August 1944.
Their courage was not myth.
Whatever their motivation, their example restored French pride and helped a humiliated people draw a line under the horrors of the occupation - and move forward.
The Man Who Would Be King
More than anything else, I'd like to be an old man with a good face, like Hitchcock or Picasso.
The Victory of the French People
In those eight pages, replete with photographs, there is not a single picture of an American (or a British) soldier (although one can spot American or British flags in a picture or two)…
In the article The Men of August 25, there is not a single non-French allied leader mentioned (the four main "actors" being Charles de Gaulle, Philippe Leclerc, Rol-Tanguy, and Germany's Dietrich von Choltitz)
Of nine titles proposed in the suggested reading section, only two books concern the Allies as main characters, and one of those is in effect a book about the story of Robert Capa's D-Day pictures.
Not until the eighth and final page do we see articles concerning the United States, and they are ambivalent at best. The first concerns the common interests and the ambiguous relations between Paris and Washington, the second is an interview of historian Denis Peschanski, a research director at the CNRS, concerning the fact that "the way it was carried out, the liberation of Paris was not in the plans of General Eisenhower". Charles de Gaulle managed to change that, Dieu merci!
| Are you experienced? | C'est du vécu |
| What's going down in the Paris suburbs and what is it like for a French Jew to live and work there? Michaël Sebban's excellent book 'Lehaïm' provides a peek.
| Qu'est-ce qui se passe en banlieue parisienne et cela fait quoi d'être juif et d'y vivre et travailler? 'Lehaïm', l'excellent livre de Michaël Sebban, lève le voile pour nous donner un aperçu.
|
| French rap | Rap fwançais |
| Up and coming rappers 'Bagdad Squad' now featured at the FNAC (French mass market WalMart type store for books, CDs, and DVDs). And they look the part, too. Send them to Sadr City. Mother Green will know what to do with them.
| Des rappers franchouilles qui font leur percée sous le nom de 'Bagdad Squad' actuellement mis en vedette à la FNAC. En plus, ils ont la (sale) tête de l'emploi. Qu'ils aillent à Sadr City. Les US Marines sauront quoi faire avec eux.
|
| Come to think of it, I prefer the expression 'Freedom Fries' | Du coup, je préfère l'expression 'Freedom Fries' |
| Here is some pseudo-intellectual drivel about how young French are being locked up in a 'linguistic ghetto'. I can only assume that because young French are too stupid to speak French correctly, taxpayers will soon be required to fork over additional funds in a futile effort to reverse the trend. The article doesn't mention that the French spoken in the suburbs is increasingly tainted by racist, Islamist overtones. 'Feuj' (roughly translated in English by the word 'kike') is also used to mean 'stupid' or 'worthless'. Young French are calling 'kike' anything outmoded or defective. 'I'm in a Palestinian mood' is now being used to mean 'I'm really angry and I'm going to explode.'. This expression was recently picked up in a song by Booba.)
| Voici des âneries de pseudo-intellos au sujet des chères têtes blondes franchouilles qui sont, paraît-il, renfermés dans un ghetto linguistique. Nous pouvons donc partir du principe que, parce que ces jeunes fwançais sont incap' de causer correctement leur langue, les contribuables seront rackettés en vue de financer un effort, bien futile, d'inverser cette tendance néfaste. L'article passe sous silence que la langue française parlée en banlieue est de plus en plus frelatée de relents racistes et islamistes. Le mot 'Feuj', en plus de son emploi en tant qu'insulte pérojative à l'égard des juifs, est utilisé à la place de 'stupide' et 'sans valeur' ('Eh mec, ta caisse est feuj.'). Depuis peu l'expression 'Je suis d'humeur palestinienne.' est employé pour dénoter un degré d'énervement nettement supérieur à 'vénère'. (style 'Je suis furax et je vais tout faire péter.' Récemment repris dans une chanson de Booba.)
|
Tuesday, August 24, 2004
From the Wires: Busy Day
Remeber? Thousands of surgeons had been threating to on strike by leaving for the UK to protest high insurance rates and low pay. The AFP now reports:
Some 2,000 French private practice surgeons who had threatened to go into "exile" next week in Britain in protest at low pay and soaring insurance rates on Tuesday called off their strike.Nazis Here... Nazis There...
"After long negotiations with the health minister, the leaders of Surgeons of France welcome the willingness and determination of Philippe Douste-Blazy to save the surgical profession in France," the group said in a statement.
Reuters reports:
French police arrested a Romanian man on Tuesday as he scrawled a swastika and a Star of David on the wall of an Interior Ministry building while shouting "Long Live Germany", a police spokesman said.Meanwhile, in the Germany, unknown persons are busy trying to catch up on the latest fashion craze but not doing too well: according to the Belga news agency, 50 tombs in Jewish cemetery in Bochum, western Germany, were found desecrated by unknown persons who had put Nazi stickers on them. Stickers? How will they ever undo the damage?
Paris police were not sure whether the man, who was caught defacing the building in broad daylight, was a racist or a deranged person inspired by a recent series of desecrations at Jewish, Muslim and Christian cemeteries, the spokesman said.
France's series of anti-religious attacks, which included the firebombing of a Jewish soup kitchen in Paris on Sunday, continued on Tuesday with the damaging of about 40 graves at a Catholic cemetery near the central town of Saint Etienne.
Israeli FM Sylvain Shalom is in Paris and he reportedly says he feels "encouraged" by remarks made by French authorities on the subject of anti-Semitism but he wants results.
According to France 3, roughly 200 people gathered in front of the Jewish soup kitchen on rue Perpignan this evening to protest anti-Semitism. Representatives of the Jewish community, elected officials and officials from the French Union of Sephardic Jews, which ran the soup kitchen. Rabbi Claude Zaffran, who leads a nearby synagogue, castigated investigating magistrates, shouting, "How long shall you judge with iniquity and how long shall you take the side of the unbelievers?" The mayor of the 11th arrondissement called on others to "attack the real causes" of anti-Semitism and "restore the rule of law." The crowd observed a minute of silence and then dispersed in silence.
The judges, however, decided to hit back. According to Reuters, the two main magistrate's unions issued statements rebutting claims that they have been lax in the prosecution of anti-Semitism.
Paris Liberates Itself
We cannot forget all the women and all the men who sacrificed their lives for freedom. Our freedom.To no one's surprise, the French communist party's daily newspaper fronts an article on the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Paris, in which the words "American", British", and "allied" (or their derivatives) are not mentioned once. L'Humanité's director in person, Patrick Le Hyaric, steps up to pen the piece singing the praises of the women and the men "who sacrificed their lives for freedom. Our freedom."
Sixty years ago, a major page in the history of France was being written. The people of Paris liberated France's capital.Follows an account of the capital's liberation as a product of communist-style street demonstrations (including the CGT railroad workers' "great heroic strike" of August 10 which "paralyze[d] the enemy forces"). It gets better yet. It turns out that that era's resistants were the forerunners to today's anti-globalization protestors!
The liberation of Paris gave an extraordinary inspiration to the hope for a world of peace, justice, and solidarity. …(Note: Does Patrick Le Hyaric have any idea as to what "popular sovereignty" stands for in the context of 1850s politics in America? Never mind.)
The lessons are topical. Indeed, what triumphed were the noble ideals of the Republic, liberty, fraternity, democracy. A certain view of the free human being, refusing to submit, an actor of popular sovereignty.
The list of what triumphed over the Nazis in August 1944 goes on and on until we learn that it includes "the creation of public sectors, of social security, of the statutes of the civil service, the relaunching of public education". The writer links this to the current state of French hospitals and the privatization of government sectors, and he manages to rant against the European constitution.
"Dominating powers", war-mongering "dark forces", and "barbarity" are also mentioned, not in the context of the Germans or the Nazis, however, but of modern-day free trade "ultracapitalists".
And again, nowhere a mention of America, Britain, or the United Nations (as the allies were then called), or of Roosevelt, Churchill, Eisenhower, or Montgomery.
We cannot forget all the women and all the men who sacrificed their lives for freedom. Our freedom.
| What will the French say when the time comes to go to Tehran? | Que diront les franchouilles quand l'heure arrivera d'aller à Tehran? |
| Renault CEO in Tehran for joint venture with Khodro. Kill faster. Total war. France is the Limp biscuit for hardcore ayatollahs.
| Le PDG de Renault à Tehran au nom du projet conjoint avec Khodro. Tuer plus vite. Guerre totale. La France est L'ami mou des mollahs durs.
|
| Instead, how about we just avoid liberating Zeropa? | Et si on évitait plutôt de libérer la Zéropa? |
| In today's | Aujourd'hui dans |
| German soldier: 'Can you avoid sending us to Gitmo?'
|
|
| Trans-Zeropa Kristallnacht Express | |