Tuesday, May 20, 2025

If Biden Had a High Cancer Score While in the White House, Shouldn't He Have Had Surgery (a Biopsy) Under Anesthesia? Does Anybody Ever Remember Him Handing Over Authority to Kamala?


As if there weren't enough questions regarding Joe Biden's (lack of) transparency, and while Fox News senior health editor Melissa Rudy asks doctors to break down what it means that Biden’s prostate cancer is ‘hormone-sensitive’, our friend Duncan Hill digs up what so far seems to be an unasked question:

Last night I heard on the news that Biden's Gleason score was 9. Yikes, that's scary high. But, my next thought was a Gleason analysis required a biopsy. A biopsy from the prostate requires surgery...minor but still done with the patient under anesthesia. So, Biden was unconscious for a period of time. Doesn't he have to publicly hand over temporary authority to the Vice President? Does anybody remember that happening?

Whatever the timing of the biopsy was, there is no way in hell Biden's doctors weren't aware of elevated PSA. And if the cancer has progressed as far as they say it has, an elevated PSA would have shown up a long time ago.

Also, we're told that Biden was undergoing therapy for his cancer while he was occupying space in the Oval Office. Somewhere I heard it was hormone therapy and that was why he had poor balance and cognitive issues. When I was deciding on a therapy for my prostate cancer I did a deep dive into researching hormone therapy. Falling down and mumbling were never mentioned...never...at least in the patients and doctors that I talked to.

How come every Dem narrative falls apart with just a moment of thought applied? Forget it...I answered my own question.

As it happens, now a Former Biden medical advisor says he 'probably' had cancer at beginning of presidency (Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel is the brother of none other than Rahm "Never let a crisis goto waste" Emanuel).
You can count on another ol' amigo, Damian Bennett, to put 2 and 2 together, joining Joe Biden's Democrat Party and the mainstream media at the hip, and tell everybody
Never Forget, Never Forgive, J6 All Biden's Enablers:
Table setting:

Réchauffage:
  • Chuck Schumer in 2024: "His mental acuity is great. It's fine. It's as good as it's been over the years."
    Chuck Schumer in 2025: "We're looking forward. That's it."
  • Karine Jean-Pierre in 2024: "He is sharp. He is on top of things."
    Karine Jean-Pierre in 2025: "I don't want to rehash the past."
  • J.B. Pritzker in 2024: "He is on the ball. The man knows more than most of us have forgotten."
    J.B. Pritzker in 2025: "Look, all this stuff about his health or, you know, commentary that people are making in books, uh, frankly, that's very backward looking."
  • Pete Buttigieg in 2024: "The president, the boss that I work for, is a focused and disciplined leader."
    Pete Buttigieg in 2025: "Right now with the benefit of hindsight, I think most people would agree [Biden shouldn't have run]. We're also not in a position to wallow in hindsight."
  • Jim Clyburn in 2024: "I do not believe that Joe Biden has a problem leading for the next four years."
    Jim Clyburn in 2025: "I have no idea. I don't have a medical degree."
  • Elizabeth Warren in 2024: "I talk to the man. The man is sharp. The man knows what he’s talking about. He does the job."
    Elizabeth Warren in 2025: "[barely contains laughter] ... The question is, what are we gonna do now?"
As a dog returneth to his vomit...:
Enough, hundreds more like the above. For the record, ahead of the curve for years (actually since before the Bork, and Thomas hearings):

Mr. Biden has twice failed to convince his own party that he is presidential material (1988 garnering 2 delegates and most recently 2008, when he garnered none). Mr. Obama reached down and lifted him up, praising Mr. Biden as an exemplary substitute for himself.

Mr. Biden has some unusual experiences that qualify him for something, though not the presidency. [Pause.] Not even the vice presidency. For example, he managed to graduate from law school in the "top half" of his class while ranked 76th in a class of 85, scil., the bottom quintile. That's a very neat trick and valuable experience.

And there's more. There's always more with Joe. So much more that Mr. Obama has "assigned two veteran minders to travel with [Mr. Biden] — David Wilhelm, a former Democratic National Committee chairman, and David Wade, a former spokesman for Senator John Kerry." Mr. Wade follows Mr. Biden around and, when Mr. Biden misspeaks, Mr. Wade steps in. Mr. Wade explains that Mr. Biden's errors of fact, misrepresentations of campaign positions (both Mr. McCain's and Mr. Obama's), misstatements, embellishments, untruths, cheats, and wandering garrulity, all these go to prove Mr. Biden's humanity.   

•  DGB: Joe Biden Is An Idiot October 23, 2008
  • DGB: Joe On The Job February 27, 2009
  • DGB: The Enforcer March 21, 2009
  • DGB: Joe On The Job V May 4, 2009
  • DGB: Joe On The Job VI July2, 2009
  • DGB: Joe On The Job IX November 22, 2009
  • DGB: Joe On The Job X January 13, 2010

  • DGB: Joe Biden Is An Idiot IV -- Palace Coup! March 23, 2011
    Special Constitutional Scholar Edition
    On and on and on through 2012... 
    ...then E-Nough! shuttered in 2013, then innumerable emails. Make it stop! OK, enough.

    The lying press wants you to believe they were lied to. The lying Democrats want you to believe they were lied to. Biden's lying enablers now want you to embrace the pitiable benignity of Robert Hur's assessment of Biden, a “sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory”. It is long past due for Republicans to act like Democrats and J6 everyone complicit in Joe Biden's Potemkin presidency.

    Throughout all the lying and revealed truth and finger-pointing one thing has remained constant, immutable -- Joe Biden has always been a self-serving, self-aggrandizing, vain dishonest small man, envious and tormented by the success of others. He is undeserving of forgiveness because he is incapable of contrition. He has no soul. He is an asshole.

    •  

    Posted by at

    2 comments:

    Anonymous said...

    A transperineal biopsy would require anesthesia in an operating room. However, a transrectal biopsy is an outpatient procedure that does not require anesthesia. Transrectal is an older procedure, not as accurate and with an increased chance of infection, but easier and quicker. Or he could have just had the biopsy since Jan 20.

    9:11 PM
    Don McCollor said...

    Another option would have been a nonintrusive PET scan with an injected tracer that binds to prostate cancer cells. The prostrate and any other tumors should have been lit up like Christmas trees.

    10:55 PM

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)