
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio gave a seminal, very successful, and much-appreciated address to the Munich Security Conference
He emphasized that the United States and Europe are effectively inseparable, that the alliance between them had repelled the mortal threat of Soviet communism, and that any thought of it being obsolete or superfluous was nonsense.Although he did not address the subject in these terms, Rubio confirmed that the controversy over Greenland is, like President Trump’s threats not to defend those ostensible allies that took insufficient steps to defend themselves, an illustration of the president’s technique of opening with a shock-and-awe demand or assertion well beyond the solution that he is prepared to accept.
Rather than chastising his European audience for failed socialistic economic policies and for such porous borders that they were frittering away European civilization, as Vice President J.D. Vance did at the same forum a year ago, Rubio took the stance that Western Europe and the United States had made substantially the same mistakes contemporaneously. He emphasized that President Trump is successfully leading America out of this policy morass, and recommended the same course to his audience.
“We do not want our allies to be weak, because that makes us weaker,” he said. “This is why we do not want our allies to be shackled by guilt and shame. We want allies who are proud of their culture and their heritage, who understand that we are heirs to the same great and noble civilization, and who together with us, are willing and able to defend it. ... We do not want allies to rationalize the broken status quo rather than reckon with what is necessary to fix it, for we in America have no interest in being polite and orderly caretakers of the West’s managed decline.”… He was emphatic and eloquent in stating that the last thing the United States and its government wished was the end of the transatlantic era, and that although Americans live in the Western Hemisphere, they have a permanent connection to Europe.Rubio recounted the policy failures of both the United States and Europe that led to the deindustrialization that reduced the wealth of the West, its productive capacity, and its independence, as well as the loss of sovereignty over supply chains. He concluded that this “was not a function of a prosperous and healthy system of global trade. It was a foolish but voluntary transformation of our economy that left us dependent on others for our needs and dangerously vulnerable to crisis.”
Rubio denounced mass migration as “a crisis which is transforming and destabilizing societies all across the West.”
“Controlling who and how many people enter our countries is not an expression of xenophobia,” he said. “It is not hate. It is a fundamental act of national sovereignty. And the failure to do so is not just an abdication of one of our most basic duties owed to our people. It is an urgent threat to the fabric of our societies in the survival of our civilization itself. And finally, we can no longer place the so-called global order above the vital interests of our people and our nations.”
… What he is really aiming at is for Europe, which is of a vastly greater economic and military power than Russia, to live up to its strategic potential, while assisting in the creation of a subtle containment strategy opposite the Chinese involving the principal countries of India, Japan, and Australia. Ultimately it would also include Russia, China’s ancient rival in the Eurasian landmass, after Russia has successfully been induced out of the smothering embrace of Beijing.
1 comment:
"Europe, which is of a vastly greater economic and military power than Russia..."
I seriously doubt this as, except for Poland and the Baltic states, Euro militaries are undermanned, undertrained, and undersupplied. That they are paying lip-service to Trump's 5% GDP demand evidences this. As for "greater economic" power, the German and French economies are cratering. The EU is economically stagnant and still in the thrall of irrational climate change, even as green policies continue to kill economic growth and CANNOT in the rosiest scenario ever establish energy independence, much much less meet basic econ-energy needs. What Russia has is OIL, a leg-up (for now) on manpower, conscription in place, a warlord economy, AND nuclear weapons. As regards the EU's ability to defend and protect its peoples -- it may as well be a client state of the United States, because EVERY Euro state defense strategy begins with America doing the heavy lifting for any EU military incapacities.
Finally Communist Russia is used to deprivations, hardships, suffering, and war, while socialist EU is used to coddling, whining, strongly worded letters, geo-political vogueing, appeasement, and -- as Afghanistan attests -- it is incapable of significant coordinated military action. Put differently, Russia has Dostoevsky, while Europa has Derrida. If you think Putin's Ukraine adventure showcases an incapable military, just wait till the EU bumbles itself into WWIII.
Coda: Why so many official EU 'personalities' openly advertising/pushing imminent WWIII? Because war is the age-old go-to for bailing out failed economies and governments.
DGB
Post a Comment