Saturday, March 21, 2026

“Driving too slowly is basically selfish and downright stupid, and is a recipe for disaster”

Slow drivers are killing or maiming more people than ever before on our roads.
Thus wrote the Daily Star six years ago, but the Slow drivers branded dangerous as they're blamed for killing more people than ever before article is as evergreen as ever.
Dawdling motorists are believed to trigger tailgating, undertaking, congestion and road rage, which can then lead to serious traffic incidents.

 … Hugh Bladon, a founder member of the Alliance of British Drivers, said: “I’m not in the least bit surprised by these worrying statistics.

“Driving too slowly is basically selfish and downright stupid, and is a recipe for disaster.”

He added: “I have advocated for a long time that driving too slowly causes frustration for other people and can cause them to attempt an overtaking manoeuvre, which is the most dangerous thing you can do on the roads. 

Related: I have been writing about this for years, notably in the post The Allyagottado Folks and the Sleep-Inducing Speed Limits
What is the first cause of mortality on highways throughout the world, and certainly throughout the West? Contrary to what … many … seem to believe, it ain't speed (speed kills, right?).

It is drowsiness.

It is sleepiness.

What causes sleepiness, or drowsiness, if it ain't a sleep-inducing speed limit (or, rather a sleep-inducing slowness limit)?
Related: • The speed limit really is just a number on a sign, and it has very little influence on how fast people drive 

A dean at NYU challenges the Economist's affusive praise of speed limits in France which led a few months later to the yellow vest revolt.

You got a fast car

I agree that the costs and benefits of speed on public roads have to be balanced, but I was surprised that your leader supporting the reduction of speed limits in France did not mention Germany (“Live fast, die fast”, June 2nd). Sections of the German Autobahn have unrestricted speed limits. Its roads are as safe as its European neighbours and significantly safer than America’s. This shows that governments do not have to control “humanity’s love of speed” by imposing limits, but by investing in smart technology to control traffic flows and maintain roads. Enforcing the rules on safe driving and strict tests also help. Taking away a freedom should never be a model if effective alternatives exist.

MARTIN IHRIG
Associate dean
Division of business 
New York University

No comments: