Tuesday, March 11, 2025

A fundamental misunderstanding: The truth about European "conservatism" that American conservatives must understand


Over at the Washington Examiner, Ian Haworth insists that American conservatives must understand the truth about European ‘conservatism’ (danke zu Stephen Green).

The American political system is unique: a system built in pursuit of deadlock rather than “progress,” a system that fully understands human nature and proactively defends against it, and a system that holds itself accountable, at least when it works as designed.

But at its heart, American politics is unique because the United States of America is unique. It is a miracle of human ideological experimentation that, thanks to the genius of the Founding Fathers, has almost single-handedly provided the country and the world with levels of peace and prosperity that would have seemed unimaginable at any other point in human history.

Despite these marvelous attributes, however, there is a persistent and dangerous flaw in the American psyche: an assumption that the rest of the world is just like us. You see it when leftists make the laughably absurd argument that all cultures are equal. If you think that’s the case, please explain how life in modern-day Nashville, Tennessee, for example, is as good as, say, that of the Mayans, who routinely performed child sacrifices to satisfy the hunger of supernatural beings.

The other side to this misguided coin is an insistence on seeing all other nations and cultures through an American lens as if Disney’s image of multiculturalism provided in Orlando’s Epcot is a window into global reality. And how does this manifest in the context of politics? One clear example is the projection of American politics onto other political movements in Europe.

How many times have British conservative politicians or figures been celebrated by American conservatives as their ideological counterparts, with even President Donald Trump praising former Prime Minister Boris Johnson as the British Trump?

How often do American conservatives celebrate nations such as Hungary for their supposed commitment to conservative principles? How often do American conservatives throw their weight behind foreign political campaigns after skimming the blurb and picking the self-professed conservative choice, as with Department of Government Efficiency leader Elon Musk’s recent rush to cheer on the German AfD party?

But at the center of these misguided alignments, and so many others, is a fundamental misunderstanding: the assumption that foreign conservatism bears any meaningful resemblance to American conservatism. Newsflash, it doesn’t. In fact, it’s about as similar as chalk and cheese.

American conservatism is built upon a set of foundational principles, principles enshrined in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The rights to free speech, gun ownership, freedom of religion, and freedom of assembly and the notion of limited government are not mere policy preferences. They are the core tenets that define what it means to be an American conservative. At least, they used to be.

True American conservatism is not just a political leaning. It is a philosophy rooted in the preservation of individual liberty and our God-given inalienable rights. Meanwhile, European conservatism is mere branding. What passes for “conservatism” in Europe depends entirely on the alternative, which often makes it little more than a nationalistic version of its left-wing opposition with a half-hearted call for marginally lower taxes and a growing opposition to unfettered illegal immigration.

Sure, these European conservative parties might occasionally borrow from the American conservative playbook in terms of their rhetoric, speaking passionately of freedom or tradition or liberty, but they lack the ideological backbone and the political will to turn these words into action. Let alone the fact that American conservatism is tied to the ideology that birthed the nation itself. European conservatism is tied to nothing.

In the United Kingdom, the Conservative Party enjoyed power for more than a decade before being unseated by Keir Starmer’s Labour Party. What conservative values that are central to American conservatism did the Conservative Party defend? The U.K. is still anti-gun, still pro-abortion, still pro-socialized medicine, and still hostile to free speech.

Our trans-Atlantic cousins have hate speech laws that criminalize political expression, knife control laws that would be laughable if they weren’t so dystopian, and a public healthcare system that is as mandatory as it is inefficient. If that’s what passes for “conservatism,” count me out.

Hungary’s right-wing populist Fidesz party, led by Viktor Orban, is often praised by American conservatives for its hard-line stance on immigration and defense of national identity. While there certainly are aspects of Orban’s policies that merit discussion, let’s not kid ourselves. Hungary is not a beacon of conservatism in the American sense, and its claims of conservative victories often rely on a heavy dose of marketing-based creativity.

What about Germany’s Alternative fur Deutschland? While it brands itself as a nationalist, anti-globalist party while being arguably and oxymoronically pro-Russia, it is by no means a party that champions the ideals of small government and individual liberty. Germany remains deeply embedded in the European Union’s bureaucratic nightmare, and the AfD, despite its populist rhetoric, has shown no real commitment to dismantling this supranational control. Just like there is no word for “fluffy” in German, there is no German word for “small government.”

Then there’s France, where “conservatism” is often nothing more than a slightly slower march toward socialism. Marine Le Pen’s National Rally party may reject mass immigration and Islamic extremism, but it is hardly a bastion of free-market policy or constitutional rights. You could even argue that it represents a nationalist brand of leftism, with economic policies that would make Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) blush.

Of course, the “America First” crowd will now ask: Why does this matter? Well, because if you care about American conservatism, you should care when our flag bearers start waving other flags at the same time. While it’s obvious that European politicians have a lot to gain by aligning themselves with us, when we align with European “conservatives” in return, despite sharing few or no actual ideological positions, we risk diluting our movement and becoming more like them.

If American conservatives look to Europe for inspiration, we risk normalizing the idea that big government is acceptable as long as it wears a different hat, and we risk embracing a watered-down version of our own ideology that makes room for policies we would otherwise reject.

The truth is we don’t need to look abroad for examples of conservatism. We already have the greatest example right here at home. We are a nation built on not only independence from a foreign government but independence from big government, a nation that enshrined inalienable rights into our Constitution.

Instead of looking to Europe for guidance, we should be strengthening what makes American conservatism unique. We should be fighting to uphold the principles of limited government, free markets, and individual liberties — not seeking validation from parties that wouldn’t recognize true conservatism if it smacked them on the nose.

So, the next time you see a European politician being lauded as the “Trump of [insert country here],” take a step back and ask yourself: What do they actually stand for? Do they defend the right to bear arms? Do they oppose government overreach in healthcare and the economy? Do they protect free speech from government interference? If the answer is no, non, or nein, then they are not conservative in the American sense. 

And the American sense of conservatism is the only one that matters. Here’s a radical idea: Stop looking to Europe. We are still the best. Act like it.

Monday, March 10, 2025

Is Donald Trump Dropping the Ukrainians? Asks French TV; Is America Still the Ally of Europe?


On Saturday evening, BFMTV hosted a debate on Ukraine, the war with Russia, Putin's most recent bombardments, and whether the United States is still an ally of Europe.

The BFMTV debate became very animated, in the words of Philippe Karsenty, who stood alone up against five or six anti-Trumpists, not excluding the TV presenter herself, all of whom tried to interrupt him (1:11:17-1:40:24).

Émission du 8 mars 2025

Le vendredi, samedi et dimanche soir, Karine de Ménonville est à la tête de Week-End Soir : un rendez-vous pour décrypter et débattre, au cœur de l’actualité.
1h40min|2025|
Diffusée le 8 mars 2025 à 22h00 sur BFM TV
Encore disponible 8 jours

How does the Democratic Party expect to be popular when it is "offending most people in the country, calling everybody sexist and racist and transphobic and every other name, and then saying, ‘please follow us'’'?


"Offending most of the country, turns out, is not as popular as my party thought it was going to be."
Van Jones warns Democratic Party is 'screwed,' adding they 'don't know what to do' writes Lindsay Kornick on Fox News.

Former Obama advisor Van Jones declared that the Democratic Party was "screwed" and trapped between two deeply unpopular factions.

The CNN commentator couldn’t help but laugh at the "nightmare" Democrats were in when asked about the ongoing friction between party members.

"Look, man, we’re screwed," Jones said on "CNN Newsroom" Sunday. "I mean, Democrats don’t know what to do. This is a nightmare. You know, somebody like Donald Trump, we thought we’d at least have Hakeem Jeffries in the Speaker’s chair to hold him back if we didn‘t have Kamala in there to do the right thing."

Jones commented on how the party continues to be caught between the establishment members and the more progressive members with no clear path moving forward.

"Listen, the Democratic Party is going through a massive set of internal crises. You have a party that got trapped two ways," he said. "One, defending a broken status quo that nobody likes because they thought that Donald Trump was going to make it worse. But when you’re defending the status quo, you’re going to lose."

"And then offending most people in the country, calling everybody sexist and racist and transphobic and every other name, and then saying, ‘please follow us.’ That’s not a good strategy, folks [Laughter]. Defending a broken status quo and offending most of the country, turns out, is not as popular as my party thought it was going to be. And so it’s going to take a while for people to get it figured out," Jones added.


But have no fear, leftists. As Stephen Kruiser writes, the Dems Are Hoping to F-Bomb Their Way Into America's Hearts:  

This is from something that Rick wrote over the weekend [Dems Tossing 'F Bombs' Around, Looking to Create a 'Shortcut to Authenticity' by Rick Moran]:

For Democrats, the experience is particularly unnerving. It has unmoored many of them from civilized society and sent them on a search for "authenticity." As Politico reports, "one unifying thread as they try to invigorate their connection to the American voter has been a reach for profanity."

 … And who needs fresh policy ideas when you can bond with the voters by simply wagging a salty tongue?

I'll admit to being a little torn here. Lately, I think it would be nice to go for a day or two without writing another "Yeesh, look what the Democrats are up to now" column. Then again, that's a rich vein of material to keep mining. There's also the fact that this particular iteration of the Democratic Party is so filled with lunatics that there is some variety to the expressions of madness.

To the surprise of no one, Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas shows up in this story. She is rapidly establishing herself as the Queen of the Democratic toilet. If the Dems ever do eventually come up with any coherent plans for emerging from the political exile that they are in at the moment, there's a good chance that Crockett's perpetually open foul mouth will interfere with them. I've got a feeling about this one. In fact, I told Paula last week that we might want to get more pictures of Crockett for our photo library because I'm sure we're going to be writing about her a lot in the coming months. 

None of it will be flattering, by the way.

The fact that the Dems think that coarse language will "invigorate their connection to the American voter" shows that they've lost all ability to read the room. If American voters are swearing up a storm, it's likely in response to the mess that Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and the rest of the Democrats spent the last four years making. I know I threw more than a few f-bombs their way during that time.

Sunday, March 09, 2025

Beijing's Road & Belt: China is not only trying to junk the Monroe Doctrine, it wants to establish itself as the head of the OAS


China is "trying to junk the Monroe Doctrine," reports Dick Morris, and "establish itself as the head of the Organization of American States" (OAS).

Attempting to influence the upcoming election of the secretary general of the OAS tomorrow Monday (March 10), a victory for the Surinam candidate would signify a Chinese implantation of the Western hemisphere.

Related
: You Cannot Understand Trump's Greenland-Panama-Canada Declarations Unless You Recognize the Extent of the China Threat 

 … Beijing approaches a country with country with limited resources — mainly, but not uniquely, in Asia and Africa — and offers them very good deals with regards to investments. When the country cannot pay its bills, the offer turns out to be a Trojan Horse with Beijing taking over all or part of a city's infrastructure.

 … The Economist's Telegram reports that

Chinese ambitions to develop a port near Antarctica were “appalling” to America, [Carlos Ruckauf, a former Argentine vice-president and foreign minister] says. China’s space-peering radar station is a “very hard” problem because it is governed by a bilateral treaty.

 … [Already, Beijing is responsible for] Chancay, a Chinese-built and controlled port in Peru, which will be the largest and deepest on South America’s Pacific coast.

It is nothing less than incredible that Beijing managed to build a new Chinese Megaport — the largest on Latin America's Pacific Coast, referred to as China’s gateway to South America — only three or four months ago without it being reported in the West, even by conservative news sites.

 … in his article about waging Diplomatic War in the Central and South Pacific, Austin Bay writes that

Chinese military aircraft and navy warships need forward bases beyond the First Island Chain (Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines).

The new bases also provide the People's Liberation Army with missile launch sites. The closer missile launchers are to U.S. bases such as Pearl Harbor, San Diego and Puget Sound, the better, from Beijing's perspective. All the better for cowing the U.S. Navy.

 … the hearts and minds of people living in these [places] matter. In these small nations, (and that's the current political configuration, nations and confederations) they are vulnerable to the suite of tricks that serves Beijing well in Europe and Washington. The wallets of agents of influence -- diplomatic slang for politicians and media operatives accepting bribes -- are a classic means of first obtaining a weather station, then fishing rights, then naval anchorage rights, then a navy base. After the navy base: a missile launch site.

Saturday, March 08, 2025

The Folks Who Hid Anne Frank Were Breaking the Law; While The People Who Killed Anne Frank Were Following the Law

Eighty years ago, in March 1945 or as early as February, Anne Frank suffered so much at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp that the teenager passed away at only 15 years of age, a day after her older sister Margot.

Could it be that the most important that can be said about Anne Frank can reduced be to a meme?

The people who denounced Anne Frank and her family's hiding place were following (indeed, were respecting) the law — as were those who later killed her; while the people who tried to hide the Frank family members were breaking the law. 

So: No, the law is not a moral compass.

Meanwhile, in Belgium, incidentally, RTBF TV has been offering a series of documentaries on the Holocaust.

Anne Frank, journal d'une adolescente (Un journal intime vendu à 30M d’exemplaires) 

Il y a 80 ans, en mars 1945, Anne Frank mourait dans le camp de Bergen-Belsen, après s'être cachée avec sa famille pendant 761 jours dans "l'Annexe secrète" des bureaux de son père à Amsterdam. Au moyen d'extraits de son célèbre Journal dont le Anne Frank Fonds nous a donné un accès exclusif, ainsi que de photographies inédites et d'archives historiques colorisées, nous allons plonger dans le quotidien, les joies, les espoirs et les angoisses d'une jeune adolescente de 13 ans, juive, clandestine, cachée sous l'Occupation nazie. Depuis sa parution en 1947, Le Journal d'Anne Frank a été publié dans 192 pays, traduit dans 78 langues et vendu à plus de 30 millions d'exemplaires à travers le monde. Une extraordinaire leçon de vie pour comprendre comment grandir, comment vivre, alors que la barbarie envahit le monde. Un témoignage direct, sensible et poignant sur l'adolescence, qui reste aujourd'hui plus que jamais nécessaire. Pour créer un pont naturel avec les jeunes générations, nous avons donné un visage à Kitty, l'amie imaginaire à qui Anne Frank écrivait : cinq adolescentes, plurielles, issues de la diversité. Ces jeunes filles sont aujourd'hui les dépositaires de la mémoire d'Anne. Nous les avons filmées dans leur quotidien, dans des séquences de vie en écho avec le récit du Journal. Anne Frank, l'histoire d'une adolescente, l'histoire d'une jeune fille qui devient une femme malgré la guerre et la terreur et qui, 80 ans après sa mort, reste un symbole universel de résistance et d'espérance. Réalisation : Alexandre Moix - Production : KM production & Bleu Kobalt

Casting et équipe

Réalisateur

Moix Alexandre

Friday, March 07, 2025

A Worse Danger for the West than the President of Russia, Warns Philippe Karsenty, Is the Emir of Qatar


"The real danger is not with Putin!" insisted Philippe Karsenty as he appeared on La Matinale de Frontières Media. "We must listen again to JD Vance's speech. It is a wake-up call to Europeans to defend freedoms in the face of mass immigration. Qatar is Islamicizing our country." 

During his Interview Frontale (40:15-1:08:40), indeed, the spokesman of le Comité Trump France warned that a more dangerous aggressor than the Russian president is the Emir of Qatar, who is trying to Islamicize the entire West. After all, the knife attacks on random Western citizens, or the driving of cars or trucks into city crowds, rarely involves Russian citizens. Also, a number of members in the government of François Bayrou are, or certainly have been reci[ients of Qatari aid, the emir of whose country — unlike Russia's president — is in no way persona non grata among Western capitals.

Philippe Karsenty also mentioned Nicolas Conquer's upcoming book, "Qui sera le Trump français?" (Who Will Be France's Trump?)

Dans notre matinale du 4 mars 2025, nous accueillons Stanislas Rigault président de Génération Z ainsi que Marc Baudriller directeur adjoint de la rédaction de Boulevard Voltaire. Nous échangeons sur les conventions citoyennes décentralisées sur l'identité française, souhaitées par François Bayrou. Nous nous demandons ainsi ce que signifie être français. Lors de notre Interview Frontale, nous recevons Philippe Karsenty porte-parole du comité Trump France. Nous analysons la posture de Donald Trump en ce qui concerne le dossier ukrainien. Sommaire : 00:00 : Intro 01:24 : Le Flash 04:48 : Le Réveil des Idées avec Stanislas Rigault président de Génération Z ainsi que Marc Baudriller directeur adjoint de la rédaction de Boulevard Voltaire. Nous échangeons sur les conventions citoyennes décentralisées sur l'identité française, souhaitées par François Bayrou. Nous nous demandons ainsi ce que signifie être français. 37:46 : La chronique de Solène 40:19 : L'Interview Frontale, nous recevons Philippe Karsenty porte-parole du comité Trump France. Nous analysons la posture de Donald Trump en ce qui concerne le dossier ukrainien. 1:08:57 : Le Grand Échiquier Bon visionnage ! Procurez-vous notre premier hors-série : Invasion migratoire : Les coupables 📍Disponible dès maintenant kiosque. Commande : https://www.frontieresmedia.fr/produi... 🗞️ Retrouvez nos enquêtes, magazines, vidéos et podcasts sur : http://www.frontieresmedia.fr

Wednesday, February 26, 2025

Macron's Visit to the Trump White House Is Discussed on French Radio

The French radio channel Sud Radio asked Philippe Karsenty to discuss with Alexis Poulin the subject of Emmanuel Macron's visit to the White House and his meeting with Donald Trump regarding the Ukraine war (20:39-43:00). 

Previously, Alexis Poulin chuckled as he mentioned the Candace Owens book about Macron's wife Brigitte (who she claims in Becoming Brigitte to be a male), with the book Devenir Brigitte disappearing from all French sales outlets, online and other, from one day to the next (18:05).

Avec Arnaud Benedetti, rédacteur en chef de la Revue politique et parlementaire / Philippe Karsenty, porte parole du comité Trump France / Alain Juillet, ancien directeur du renseignement au sein de la direction générale de la Sécurité extérieure (DGSE) Retrouvez Alexis Poulin sans réserve tous les vendredis de 12h à 13h sur #SudRadio.

Sunday, February 23, 2025

French TV Channel Beclowns Itself While Trying to Defend Leftist VIPs Raising Arms in the Nazi Salute


In the wake of the "scandal" of Elon Musk — and now, at CPAC, Steve Bannon — accused of using a Nazi salute, numerous people have gone online and found (and shared) examples of leftists, politicians and VIPs alike — and even offhand non-political citizens, like the Pope, Paul McCartney, and a Village People singer — making gestures with an arm that could easily be interpreted as them about to shout "Heil Hitler." (Read notably the Times of India article, Everybody is a Nazi — Defending Elon Musk, social media users show Taylor Swift, Obama and Superman giving 'Nazi Salute'.)

Which brings us to an incredible France24 report in which salt-smelling fact-checkers (sic) seek to debunk the fact that Democrat politicians (alone, unlike rightist politicians) are doing anything of the kind (merci à Sylvain).

In France24's Truth Or Fake segment, one Sharon and Vedika Bahl go on to report about "a host of Democratic politicans [who] are being falsely accused online of doing Nazi salutes." 

48,350 views Jan 27, 2025 #barackobama #elonmusk #fakenews
A photomontage of four Democratic politicians – Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris – has racked up over 150 million views on X, claiming to show them making what has been likened to a "Nazi salute", similar to the arm gesture Elon Musk was criticised for at Donald Trump’s inauguration. These images are stripped of their context and are all taken as screenshots from wider speeches, with no deliberate gestures. Vedika Bahl debunks clip by clip in this episode of Truth or Fake. #elonmusk #barackobama #fakenews


Snopes joins the scuffle with a strange title that is a statement already providing a judgment: No, These Politicians Did Not Make the Same Gesture as Elon Musk. Traditionally, a Snopes title is an objectively-sounding question that it proceeds to (try to) answer in the text ("Did So-and-So Really Do/Say Such-and-Such?", the very best example in this case being… Did Musk Give 'Nazi Salute' at Trump's 2025 Inauguration Rally? [before weaseling out of giving a negative, or any kind of, answer]). Here, Snopes not only defends the Democrats, it goes beyond that, it makes a point to point out that These Politicians Did Not Make the Same Gesture as Elon Musk (!), suggesting the latter's gesture, by contrast — whether fascist or other, they conveniently refrain from saying — was indeed shameful and that he was indeed guilty.

However, the images being shared present each politician in a misleading manner — they were waving their hands and speaking on different issues that had nothing to do with Nazism.

Guess what, Snopes. Guess what, France24. Yuuuuuge spoiler:  That is precisely what we are saying about Elon Musk (not to mention the War Room's Bannon).

Well, if the mainstream media can report on "the spread of this misinformation" about leftists, why is Elon Musk's gesture still "controversial"? Can't France24 add right-leaning individuals to Vedika Bahl's Truth Or Fake report, such as, I dunno, Elon Musk and Steve Bannon?!

Here, let me do it for you:   

few fascists ever, few Nazis ever gave the fascist/Nazi salute from the heart, as Elon Musk did. Whether in Italy, in Spain, in Portugal, or in Germany, the arm went straight up from the side as the individual is standing still. Aye, there is the rub: the salute is traditionally formal, given as a soldier standing still by an "inferior" to a "superior" at the outset of an event or only when asked (when commanded) to do so. 

Thus we see lines of Germans, in uniform or civilian attire, all doing the Führergruß together, mechanically, at exactly the same time, while shouting the same words (Heil Hitler or Sieg Heil) in unison; the fact that nobody in the audience returned, or even recognized, Musk's salute, much less thought of returning it, is also evidence of elevated Drama Queenery. It is not a salute the "superior" gives to his "inferiors" (except as a return), certainly not informally in the middle of a speech, emotional or otherwise, as he (or she) prances about from one side of the stage to the other, like a Mexican jumping bean.

But luckily, when you take a look at France24's YouTube comments, the overwhelming amount of readers are smart enough to notice the double standards: just about every single comment about "Gruppenführer Musk" (LOL) eviscerates the France24 report. (The final comment is the best…)

40

Saturday, February 22, 2025

First Elon Musk, Now Steve Bannon: "All I Was Doing Was Wave to the Audience"


The latest example of Drama Queenery comes from France via CPAC, where Jordan Bardella pulled out of a scheduled speech because one of the speakers, Steve Bannon, allegedly made a "gesture referring to Nazi ideology". 

The BBC's Brandon Drenon:

"If he cancelled [the speech] over what the mainstream media said about the speech, he didn't listen to the speech. If that's true, he's unworthy to lead France. He's a boy, not a man," Bannon told the French news magazine Le Point. 

At the Reagan Dinner Friday night, the head of the War Room again said: "All I did was wave to the audience."

As I wrote when the Elon Musk scandal erupted,  

few fascists ever, few Nazis ever gave the fascist/Nazi salute from the heart, as Elon Musk did. Whether in Italy, in Spain, in Portugal, or in Germany, the arm went straight up from the side as the individual is standing still. Aye, there is the rub: the salute is traditionally formal, given as a soldier standing still by an "inferior" to a "superior" at the outset of an event or only when asked (when commanded) to do so. 

Thus we see lines of Nazis, in uniform or civilian attire, all doing the Führergruß together, mechanically, at exactly the same time, while shouting the same words (Heil Hitler or Sieg Heil) in unison…

Back in Paris, as a guest on Sud Radio, ROF's Vanessa Biard-Schaeffer gave her take on the allegations… 

Update: French TV Channel Beclowns Itself While Trying to Defend Leftist VIPs Raising Arms in the Nazi Salute


8,805 views Feb 22, 2025 #C_EST_DANS_L_ACTU_3
Avec Vanessa Biard-Schaeffer, Vice-président des Republicans Overseas

Thursday, February 20, 2025

CPAC Opens As the Trump Bulldozer Does What All Conservatives Have Been Begging For for the Past Half-Century

With Stacy McCain at the Belvedere

On the day before CPAC's opening day, who did I run into at the lobby bar, aka The Belvedere, but ol' pal and fellow blogger Stacy McCain? Thanks to his blog, The Other McCain (a reference to John McCain — no relation of his, I am told — back in the days when the Arizona senator was seeking the presidency during the first decade of the 21st century), he has an excellent description of the day at the Gaylord Hotel in National Harbor (check out paragraph two, between the hotel photo and the Donut Operator photo). As Stacy wrote, we spent our cocktail hour discussing the early days of blogging — remember Blogger Row?! — and trying to figure out what had happened to all our soulmates in the past two decades.

We first met at CPAC in either 2006 or 2007, during the G.W. Bush presidency, when the Global War on Terror was still the big thing for conservatives, and doesn’t that seem like a million years ago? 

[Erik Svane] and I talked about the old times, when “blogging” was still the New Thing, before social media, TikTok, YouTube and other such developments had revolutionized the information landscape. It was at CPAC 2007 (then held at the Omni Shoreham hotel in D.C.) that I first met Andrew Breitbart, and it’s stunning to think that it’s been nearly 13 years since Andrew died suddenly of a heart attack.

Back in the day, Stacy was clean-shaven; don't tell him this, but now, behind his back, I call him General Robert E Lee…
Mike Lindell, author of "From Crack Addict to CEO"

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Soviet Document Calling Oppenheimer a Member of the CP was sent to Stalin's NKVD Capo, Beria


As a group of historians and a top biographer square off, proponents of a middle path see a tangled life in which the superstar of science was, and was not, a true Communist at the same time.

Revisiting Oppenheimer's Communist Ties: A year after Nolan's movie on Oppenheimer, revisits An Old Clash [Which] Heats Up Over Oppenheimer’s Red Ties in the New York Times.

J. Robert Oppenheimer teemed with contradictions. …

 … In a universe of contradictions, the physicist himself grew famous as an American hero and infamous as a red sympathizer. The question of his true loyalties rang alarms 80 years ago as the Federal Bureau of Investigation probed Oppenheimer’s Communist past — and is now — surprisingly — gaining new attention.

This fall, months after Christopher Nolan’s “Oppenheimer” won seven Oscars, the Journal of Cold War Studies, a quarterly publication of Harvard University, is revisiting the Oppenheimer case.

Four historians argue that the physicist was not just a Communist ally but a full-blown member of a secret Berkeley unit who ultimately perjured himself in a federal hearing that had dug into his past. As evidence, they cite a substantial body of letters, memoirs and espionage files, some postdating the movie’s source material.

“Historians have to go where the evidence takes them,” said Gregg Herken, who leads the reassessment and is emeritus professor of history at the University of California.

In sharp disagreement is Kai Bird, co-author of “American Prometheus,” the 2005 biography of Oppenheimer on which Mr. Nolan based his film. The biographer denied that, in the 18 years since his book’s publication, any evidence has come to light confirming that the superstar of American science was in fact a true Communist.

“The only reason these folks are revisiting this issue is because of the Nolan film,” Mr. Bird said. “They’re pushing their own little crusade.”

The trouble with Kai Bird, of course, is that he and Martin J. Sherwin, i.e., The Authors of the Book Behind Nolan's "Oppenheimer" Were Both Editors and Writers at "The Nation" (something the mainstream media members, even in this article, have gone out of their way to downplay).

A middle path also exists. Some scholars, not unlike the quantum physicists, see both claims about Oppenheimer as possibly true — that he was and wasn’t a dedicated Communist. Potential clues, they say, can be found in his tangled life.

“He may have wavered,” said Thomas L. Sakmyster, an expert on underground Communist units. He said that flexible rules let members see their red ties as blurry.

Oppenheimer and others, Dr. Sakmyster said, “may have thought of themselves as fellow travelers” — that is, sympathetic to Communism but not formal party members. “Probably quite a few vacillated in this in-between state.” In the idiom of the day, they were pink individuals in red groups. …/…

 … Amid the social upheavals of the Great Depression, [Julius Robert Oppenheimer], like many 1930s liberals, belonged to leftist groups that denounced fascism abroad and sought economic justice at home. Even so, the elite physicist had little in common with the “card carrying, dues paying” Communists of his day. The workers joined picket lines, went to rallies and sold newspapers that reliably echoed Moscow’s line.

The ranks of the party soon expanded, however. In the 1930s, it began to court doctors, lawyers, professors, filmmakers and other members of the middle and upper classes. Many were leery of party affiliation. In response, the American party encouraged them to join underground units where members could study Marx, adopt pseudonyms and work in secret to aid the party. They carried no cards, unlike their worker comrades.

“It was risky and thrilling,” said Dr. Sakmyster, a emeritus professor of history at the University of Cincinnati. The secret members, he added, tended to be “very idealistic, very romantic.”

This was the moment in which Oppenheimer embraced Communism. His wife, his former fiancée, his brother, his sister-in-law and some of his best friends were party members. He called himself “a fellow traveler.” He subscribed to People’s World, a Communist newspaper, and each year gave the party up to roughly $1,000 — today the equivalent of more than $20,000.

That might have raised eyebrows in some circles, but it was not illegal. And Moscow would soon be Washington’s ally in World War II. After the war, however, Moscow got the bomb and quickly built a threatening arsenal. In 1954, at the height of the McCarthy era’s anti-Communism, Oppenheimer faced a secret hearing to determine if he were a security risk.

Under oath, repeatedly, the scientific head of Los Alamos denied ever belonging to a secret Communist unit or having any kind of formal Communist affiliation.

Dr. Herken, who wrote a 2002 book on Oppenheimer, said the trail of contrary evidence starts with two unpublished memoirs.

The first, by Haakon Chevalier, the physicist’s best friend at Berkeley, told of the two men joining the secret unit. The other, by Gordon Griffiths, a graduate student who became a University of Washington historian, said that he had been the Communist liaison to the group and that Oppenheimer was a member.

“American Prometheus,” which won the 2006 Pulitzer Prize in Biography, dismissed such evidence as insubstantial. “Quite bluntly,” Mr. Bird and his co-author Martin J. Sherwin declared, “any attempt to label Robert Oppenheimer a Party member is a futile exercise.”

New clues, however, kept coming to light. In 2009, John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr, historians of American Communism and Soviet espionage, cited old Soviet intelligence reports they saw as clearly indicating that “Oppenheimer had lied” to American officials about his party affiliation.

Barton J. Bernstein, an emeritus professor of history at Stanford University who has studied the Oppenheimer case for decades, said he was skeptical at first of the physicist’s formal Communist ties but now sees the evidence as “overwhelming.”

Think about it: isn't it somewhat disconcerting — to say the least — that in the 2020s, a major motion picture, one that is highly praised and that has won the highest awards, has as its central tenet a tendency to downplay the malignancy of Stalin while accentuating the (alleged) guilt of America and the free world?

A discussion was arranged in the Fall of 2024, featuring Dr. Herken, Dr. Bernstein, Dr. Haynes and Dr. Klehr. 

Dr. Kramer said that Mr. Bird, the biographer, had declined an invitation to address their comments and that Mr. Nolan did not respond.