Saturday, October 25, 2025

Powered By AI, The U.S. Is Experiencing A Massive Boom In Investment; Sebastien Laye Explains the Reason Behind the Rebound


As Dick Morris announces that, Powered By AI, The U.S. Is Experiencing A Massive Boom In Investment, Sebastien Laye explains in the Washington Examiner the reason for the massive boom while launching a challenge: Build the infrastructure, build the AI boom.

America’s economic rebound despite tariffs during the second quarter is not a mystery — it was all dependent on artificial intelligence and data center construction. 

 … My thesis is simple: if the United States wants to sustain this growth over the next 12 months and avoid a natural slowdown, it must go all-in now on building AI infrastructure — slash permitting timelines, green-light energy projects, and mass-train the HVAC techs, electricians, and plumbers who turn capital into capacity. 

 … On power, the lesson from Europe’s moratoria is cautionary: where capacity is scarce and approvals slow, investment doesn’t pause — it just re-routes to other countries. The U.S. should take the opposite track. 

RESTORING AMERICA: HARNESSING AI TO MAKE AMERICA HEALTHY AGAIN

We have been here before. America’s 19th-century railroad boom and 20th-century highway system were growth engines that reorganized production and settlement. 30 years ago, we built the massive infrastructure underpinning the new internet. Today’s rails are fiber and power lines; today’s junctions are substation yards. 

In the meantime, Sébastien Laye's new book seems to be selling well.

The title of the book is Des moutons menés par des ânes ?, or Sheep Led by Donkeys? or Sheep Led by Asses? The title is based on the age-old idiom Lions led by donkeys, and readers will recognize that its title could apply to just about any country in the Western hemisphere.

Thursday, October 23, 2025

In the U.S., the superfluous is revoked to salvage the essential; In France, on the other hand, the superfluous is subsidized to conceal the essential


In the United States, what is superfluous gets mercilessly cut; In France, what is superfluous gets readily financed.

In an op-ed for Le Diplomate,  speaks about courage in the political sense, contrasting two ways of reforming government, in France and in Trump's America. Shutdown à Washington, panne de courage à Paris. There are so many good quotes here that it's hard to pick only one.

Shutdown in Washington, lack of courage in Paris: "In the United States, we cut the superfluous. In France, we finance it."

The United States is living in slow motion, but debating. France is spending lavishly, but remaining silent. The American shutdown acts like a cruel mirror: over there, we embrace confrontation; here, we subsidize resignation.

When the Americans cut the superfluous, France maintains the useless

For two weeks, part of the American administration has been at a standstill.

America is tearing itself apart, but debating. It embraces disagreement. And this is what distinguishes Washington from Paris: when the United States blocks to defend principles, France unblocks to buy social peace.

 … But behind the partisan tumult, Uncle Sam is asking a simple question: what should the state do, and at what cost?

In France, this question is never asked. When the state runs out of money, it borrows. When it goes into debt, it taxes. And at the end of the day, it's still John Doe who pays. Reform means only spending differently, never spending less. Our leaders dream of public efficiency, but reject state restraint. The result: a country on permanent budgetary life support, spending 57% of its national wealth without ever asking why.

The State, a business without a customer

The American crisis reminds us that a state, like any organization, must be able to question itself. In the private sector, a useless business closes. In the public sector, it becomes an acquired right.

 … In the United States, the superfluous is revoked to save the essential; In France, on the other hand, the superfluous is subsidized to conceal the essential. 

Shutdown à Washington, panne de courage à Paris : « Aux États-Unis, on coupe le superflu. En France, on le finance. »

Les États-Unis vivent au ralenti, mais débattent. La France dépense sans compter, mais se tait. Le shutdown américain agit comme un miroir cruel : là-bas, on assume la confrontation ; ici, on subventionne la résignation.

Quand les Américains coupent dans le superflu, la France entretient l’inutile

Depuis deux semaines, une partie de l’administration américaine est à l’arrêt. 

 … Les Républicains veulent réduire les dépenses, les Démocrates du Sénat refusent de voter la loi de finances temporaire — la Continuing Resolution — tant que leurs priorités ne sont pas financées. Parmi elles : plus de 1500 milliards de dollars supplémentaires pour prolonger des programmes d’aide hérités de l’ère Obama, y compris pour des immigrés en situation irrégulière. Oui, vous avez bien lu ! Donald Trump, lui, théâtralise le bras de fer : il sait que ses adversaires se piégeront par leurs propres calculs politiciens. Règle élémentaire de l’Art de la guerre : ne jamais interrompre un ennemi en train de commettre une erreur. 

L’Amérique se déchire, mais débat. Elle assume le désaccord. Et c’est bien ce qui distingue Washington de Paris : quand les États-Unis bloquent pour défendre des principes, la France débloque pour acheter la paix sociale.

 … Mais derrière le tumulte partisan, l’Amérique pose une question simple : que doit faire l’État, et à quel prix ?

En France, cette question n’est jamais posée. Quand l’État manque d’argent, il emprunte. Quand il s’endette, il taxe. Et à la fin de la journée c’est encore Nicolas qui paie. Réformer consisterait à dépenser autrement, jamais à dépenser moins. Nos gouvernants rêvent d’efficacité publique, mais refusent la sobriété étatique. Résultat : un pays sous perfusion budgétaire permanente, qui dépense 57 % de sa richesse nationale sans jamais se demander pourquoi.

 … L’État, cette entreprise sans client

La crise américaine rappelle qu’un État, comme toute organisation, doit pouvoir se remettre en cause. Dans le privé, une entreprise inutile ferme. Dans le public, elle devient un droit acquis. 

 … Les États-Unis suspendent le superflu pour sauver l’essentiel. La France, elle, subventionne le superflu pour masquer l’essentiel. 

Tuesday, October 21, 2025

Sébastien Laye's Latest Book Has Been Selling Hundreds of Copies

Invité sur La Matinale de RC par la Ligne Droite, Sebastien Laye est venu parler de son nouveau livre, qu'il évoque aussi dans une vidéo sur Youtube. Comme il le dit sur X Twitter, il y a des bonnes nouvelles et des mauvaises nouvelles. Les bonnes nouvelles, c'est que Des moutons menés par des ânes ? est déjà "sold out" sur Amazon.fr. Or, il semblerait que le livre soit la victime d'une espèce de shadow-banning :

Mon essai "Des Moutons menés par des ânes?" est deja un best seller mais impossible de l'avoir sous moins d'un mois chez @AmazonNewsFR @amazon . Marre de cette censure des livres de droite. Je vais faire remonter l'information aux USA, où Amazon s'est engagé à ne pas censurer les ouvrages. Surtout qu'il s'agit d'un simple essai économique sans prise de positions idéologiques, c'est juste un livre libéral de droite. @tegnererik @louise_morice_ @DorineRouyer

… woke or centrists LOVE books censorship. they censor even without reading the books ! in my case they are pissed off because of a foreword by a catholic businessman..@AmazonNewsFR @DavidSacks @JP_O @Ligne__Droite

Useful Idiots: If Trump were really a fascist, the demonstrations would not have been possible, because in that case his “Gestapo” would have picked up the organizers at 4 a.m. and put them in concentration camps


Over at the New York Post, Glenn Reynolds points out that ‘No Kings’ crowds don’t want more democracy — they want LESS

Watching the “No Kings” protests, a friend commented: “Democracy dies when the other side wins. Another rule they wouldn’t want to have turned back on them.”

That does seem to be the animating spirit not only of the various marches around the country, but of the entire anti-Trump resistance. 

President Donald Trump’s crime isn’t anything he’s said, or done, or even believed (which, all too often, anti-Trump protesters can’t cogently describe anyway). 

It’s that he won, and he represents the other team.

As Batya Ungar-Sargon put it: “The ‘No Kings’ rally isn’t protesting Trump but rather the agenda the majority of America voted for. The Left isn’t protesting a king but their fellow Americans. They aren’t standing up for democracy — they are protesting against it.”

 … In fact, Trump is a “king” — or “dictator,” as we’re often told — whose actual program seems to involve shrinking the government he heads. That’s not the usual thing for autocrats.

 … As Meghan McCain tweeted, “I don’t understand how Trump is a King when he won every single swing state, the electoral college and popular vote in a democratic election.”

[With sarcasm dripping from his lips,] Legal scholar Ilya Shapiro responded, “No no he’s a king by dismantling an administrative state that <checks notes> nobody voted for.”

That’s Trump’s real sin — carrying out the will of the voters.

Democrats know their policies are unpopular. That’s why they have to lie about everything from immigration to affirmative action to gun control

During the COVID years, the same people who are out marching for “no kings” supported an endless array of dictatorial measures: lockdowns, firing people for not vaccinating, arresting people for being outside, arresting people for paddle-boarding in the ocean without a mask, arresting people for holding unlicensed religious services, etc.

Read the whole thing™. In the same vein, Batya Ungar-Sargon had some hard truths to deliver on CNN last weekend while Lars Hedegaard penned the following:

The Left Hates Democracy

Last Saturday, millions of Americans took part in numerous demonstrations under the slogan “No Kings”. The anger is directed at Donald Trump, who is not a king, but was elected by an absolute majority of voters in November last year. So it can be reasonably stated that the marches are opposing the citizens who installed a president they hate. It is democracy that they want to get rid of — expressed in the demand that Trump immediately resign.

For several years, Democratic leaders and their foot soldiers have been moaning about the “fascism” that they accuse Trump of being an exponent of. Apart from that, they do not present any real policy apart from the demand for unhindered immigration of anyone who can drag themselves across the US borders — regardless of whether they are drug dealers, human smugglers, gang members or just ordinary violent psychopaths. They will therefore do everything in the world to hinder the federal authorities' efforts to enforce the current legislation. Added to this are the vague notions that Trump wants to become a dictator and steal from the poor to give to the rich.

Fortunately for the protesters, they themselves have rich backers who are pouring billions into the protests and financing the approximately 250 organizations behind the “No Kings” marches. One of them is George Soros, who has made no secret of the fact that he hates the United States and will do whatever he can to bring down the West.

If Trump were really a fascist, the demonstrations would not have been possible, because in that case his “Gestapo” would have picked up the organizers and their financial backers at 4 a.m. and put them in concentration camps. The fact that people can freely demonstrate and hurl slogans and insults at the government shows that it is not fascist.

The Democrats' historical understanding is flawed. Trump is the exact opposite of a fascist. Since he came to power, he has worked tirelessly to resolve threatening military conflicts around the world — most recently in Gaza. Was it such an effort that distinguished Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini?

Trump is also trying to slim down the federal bureaucracy — that is, to limit the power of the state — while Hitler and Mussolini worked on the opposite. As Mussolini used to say: The state is everything! Hitler prided himself on not wanting to nationalize business, but to socialize the German people and make them obedient tools of the state. Trump and his Republicans, on the other hand, believe that the foundation of the United States is civil society, where citizens can freely pursue their happiness as long as they obey the law. That is how the American Constitution was conceived.

But the left hates the constitution and therefore acts in exactly the same way as Mussolini's Fasci italiani di combattimento and Adolf Hitler's stormtroopers. For the time being, the left-wing rabidists are content with a few executions of their opponents or assassinations.

But just as Mussolini's blackshirts and Hitler's brownshirts were paid for by someone, so too are the 250 organizations behind "No Kings."

The protesters pose as advocates for the poor. In reality, they are useful idiots taking to the streets to defend the economic hegemony of the ruling class. They just don't know it because they've never heard about it in the media.

"White boomers have the right to have a mass therapy session about the fact that Donald Trump won, but to call it a No Kings protest, to act like he is a king is so utterly preposterous. This is a man who won the popular vote. He won every swing state. He is a person who is enacting the exact agenda he promised he was going to enact while he was campaigning. And so what they are actually protesting is the absolute perfection of American democracy."

Monday, October 20, 2025

Submitting to Islam's Prayer Mat: The Middle East has learned what Europe has forgotten — that peace is not created by those who understand terror, but by those who defeat it


You need not belong to the Jewish faith to understand that the Talmud is right when it says: "If you are gentle with the wicked, you end up being wicked with the gentle." In Denmark's Kristeligt Dagblad (The Christian Daily) we find this outstanding article:

Europe brings the prayer mat forth in submission, while Israel is dancing again

Israel has won over terror, but Europe can look forward to a wave of evil that we ourselves have brought upon us, believes theology student Daniel Karpantschof
Interestingly, the title is turned two different ways in the newspaper itself and on the newspaper's website: While Israel is dancing again, Europe brings the prayer mat forth in submission. On Facebook, Daniel Karpantschof's article is simply called "Israel won. Europe lost." Daniel Karpantschof is a theology student, entrepreneur, and former Danish film consultant (thanks to my cousin Ellen).
ON OCTOBER 7, 2023, Israel was attacked in one of the most brutal terrorist attacks in modern times. Thousands of civilians were murdered, raped, and abducted. It was not a territorial conflict, but an attempted annihilation. Documents show this: “Burn. Slaughter. Broadcast”; handwritten by Sinwar, in his network of cowardly tunnels.

Two years later, it is unequivocal: Israel won. Europe lost.

Hamas’s leadership — Deif, Sinwar, Haniyeh — has been eliminated. The organization’s tunnels, command centers, and weapons depots have been destroyed. Gaza City and Rafah lie in ruins. Hezbollah’s leadership is divided, Nasrallah himself is killed, while Iran is reduced to a social media superpower.

The military results exceeded even Israel’s own expectations. Hamas’s infrastructure was not only knocked out — it was rendered impossible to rebuild. Its networks in Qatar and Lebanon have been burned down. Its “army” exists only in propaganda videos. Iran, which for years tried to control the region through proxies, is now seeing its grip weakened in Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen.

Israel fought a war that combined technology, strategy, and exhausting patience. Israel’s beeper networks and drone control systems changed modern warfare. The precise coordination between air tactics, cyber warfare, and infantry regiments allowed the country to fight an enemy used to hiding among civilians without losing its moral compass.

BUT ISRAEL’S VICTORY was also political.

The country stood firm despite massive international and media pressure. It refused to let world opinion dictate its right to self-defense — and ended up creating results that even skeptics must now acknowledge: a new regional order. All attempts to renounce the Jewish state on the world stage have — once again — been met with a stone wall. Eurovision, UEFA, FIFA, and Hollywood can stand with as many red hands as they want.

The new European reflex — to respond to terror with understanding and to violence — should raise alarm bells throughout the West.

And Israel is no longer isolated. Several Arab countries — including Lebanon and Syria — have opened diplomatic channels. Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia have all signaled that Hamas’s time is over. Even Jordan and Iraq have allowed Israel to use their airspace.

For the first time in recent times, Hamas has been pressured by the Arab world — not supported by it. Iran has been put on the defensive, Hezbollah has hesitated, and the Houthi attacks (or the “Hezbollah of Temu,” as they are known in Israel) that once caused global fear have been met with coordinated responses from Western and Arab forces.

The Middle East has learned what Europe has forgotten: that peace is not created by those who understand terror, but by those who defeat it.

THE GAZA IMAGES OF RECENT DAYS show that terror not only corrupts the soul — it consumes itself. After the hostage deal, Hamas is now executing its own people in the streets, while only the male hostages return home alive. The women — whom the world claimed to be fighting for — have disappeared under pretexts that even the régime’s supporters no longer believe. And for every civilian released, Israel has been forced, under international pressure, to release convicted mass murderers and perpetrators of terror against children and families. That is not symmetry — it is moral inversion.

WHILE ISRAEL HAS RECOVERED its strength, Europe has sunk into moral disorientation. It is not that anti-Semitism has returned — it never disappeared in the first place. In France, anti-Semitic attacks have increased by 400 percent. In Germany, by 80 percent. 96 percent of EU Jews say that anti-Semitism is now part of everyday life. In the Netherlands and Belgium, the numbers reached record highs in 2024.

The new bearers of hatred call themselves “anti-Zionists,” but they recycle the old narratives. They march not in boots, but in academic robes. They do not shout Sieg Heil, but "From the river to the sea". But when monuments to the rescue of Danish Jews during the Holocaust have to be hidden away, or are considered for removal once and for all, the writing is clearly on the wall. Anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism cannot be separated.

Europe's media play along. The headlines talk about "battle between parties" and "proportions", as if a democracy and an Islamist militia were moral counterparts. Journalistic balance has turned into ethical blindness. While Jotam Confino had to resign as a correspondent on TV2, journalists at the Danish Broadcasting Corporation (DR) have been signing statements against Israel.

SEVERAL EUROPEAN GOVERNMENTS — including Spain, Norway and Ireland — have chosen to recognize a Palestinian state in the midst of war. This is not peacemaking, but a precedent stating that violence is fruitful and lucrative.

When humanism becomes selective, it becomes meaningless. It is no small thing that the same politicians who call a defensive war "genocide" call an activist's deportation "kidnapping" and "concentration camp detention." The Dhimmis' submission has become total.

Not even the church stood firm. In 2024, eight of Denmark's 10 bishops chose to condemn Israel's military actions — but without a word about the Jewish hostages, the raped women, or the Hamas child soldiers. Nor do the eight bishops have the time, energy, or Christianity to condemn the tens of thousands of Christian corpses lying in Sudan, Nigeria, Syria, or Egypt. Christian blood is worth no more than it can be forgotten in order to shed Jewish blood.

That Europe's priests are again condemning Jews before condemning anti-Semitism is nothing new. It is a repetition. Instead of defending the basic principle of civilization — that man has the right to defend himself against evil — church leaders likewise succumbed to the temptation of moral symmetry.

Europe’s Jews are figuring this out faster than their leaders. Applications for Aliyah — emigration to Israel — from France have exploded. In Germany, the Netherlands, and Britain, homes are being quietly sold while children are being enrolled in schools in Tel Aviv. Synagogues have armed guards. Schools have panic buttons. Politicians have hashtags. Bishops have blindfolds.

The new European reflex — to respond to terror with understanding and to violence with respect — should set off alarm bells throughout the West. If appeasement becomes a principle and if weakness turns into tolerance, it will affect not only Jews but all of European civilization.

When terror is once again seen as a legitimate political language, it will not stop at the walls of Jerusalem. The same forces that threaten Israel today are already testing Europe’s borders — culturally, socially, and physically.

Every concession to extremism becomes an invitation for more of the same.

The only future for a possible Palestinian self-rule must begin where the hatred ends. As in Germany after the fall of the Third Reich, as in Rwanda following the genocide, as in South Africa in the wake of apartheid: only when the population itself takes responsibility for its crimes can reconciliation begin.

A future Truth and Reconciliation Commission for Palestine can only be built on an absolute and unconditional rejection of terror, hatred, brutality, and violence: a total and unconditional surrender. From here a new beginning can grow. Not as revenge, but as acknowledgment.

But today that path is blocked by European politics. 

When countries like Spain, Ireland, Norway, Belgium, and Slovenia recognize a state before violence is rejected, they teach the region and their fellow citizens that terror is a lucrative proposition. They undermine the future reconciliation they were supposed to support, and at the same time invite extremism into their own societies.

Europe is likely facing a wave of evil that even the Arab states were wise enough to avoid.

Europe brings the prayer mat forth in submission.

Israel is dancing again.
Man behøver ikke være jøde for at forstå at Talmuden har ret når den siger: "Hvis du er blid over for de onde, ender du med at være ond over for de blide." I Kristeligt Dagblad finder vi denne kronik:

Europa finder bedemåtten frem i underkastelse, mens Israel danser igen

Israel har vundet over terroren, men Europa kan se frem til en bølge af ondskab, som vi selv har bragt over os, mener teologistuderende Daniel Karpantschof

Pudsigt nok er titlen vendt to forskellige veje i selveste avisen og på avisens hjemmeside: Mens Israel danser igen, finder Europa bedemåtten frem i underkastelse. På Facebook hedder Daniel Karpantschofs kronik simpelthen "Israel vandt. Europa tabte." Daniel Karpantschof er teologistúderende, Iværksætter, og tidligere dansk filmkonsulent (tak til min kusinde Ellen).

DEN 7 OKTOBER 2023 blev Israel angrebet i et af de mest brutale terrorangreb i moderne tid. Tusinder af civile blev myrdet, voldtaget og bortført. Det var ikke en territorial kon-flikt, men et forsøg på udslettelse. Dokumenter viser dette: "Burn. Slaughter. Broadcast"; håndskrevet af Sinwar, i hans netværk af kujontunneller.

To år senere er det utvetydigt: Israel sejrede. Europa tabte.

Hamas' ledelse — Deif, Sinwar, Haniyeh — er elimineret. Organisationens tunneler, kommandocentre og vaben-lagre er ødelagt. Gaza City og Rafah ligger i ruiner. Hizbollahs ledelse er splittet, Nasrallah selv dræbt, og Iran reduceret til en stormagt på sociale medier.

De militæreresultater oversteg selv Israels egne forventninger. Hamas' infrastruktur blev ikke blot slået ud — den blev gjort umulig at genopbygge. Dets netværk i Qatar og Libanon er brændt sammen. Dets "hær" eksisterer kun på propagandavideoer. Iran, der i arevis forsøgte at kontrollere regionen gennem stedfortrædere, må nu se sit greb svækket i Syrien, Libanon og Yemen.

Israel førte en krig, der forenede tek-nologi, strategi og udmattende talmodighed. De israelske beeper-netværk og dronestyringssystemer ændrede moderne krigsførelse. Den præcise koordinering mellem luft, cyber og infanteri gjorde, at landet kunne bekæmpe en fjende, der gemte sig blandt civile, uden at miste sit moralske kompas

MEN ISRAELS SEJR var ogsa politisk.

Landet stod fast trods massiv international pression og mediepres. Det nægtede at lade verdensmeninger diktere sin ret til selvforsvar — og endte med at skabe resultater, som selv skeptikerne nu må anerkende: en ny regional orden. Alle forsøg på at frasige sig den jødiske stat pa verdensscenen er — endnu engang — blevet mødt med stenmur. Eurovision, UEFA, FIFA og Hollywood kan stả med nok så mange røde hænder.

Den nye europæiske  refleks — at reagere  på terror med forståelse og på vold  — bør vække alarmklokker i hele Vesten

Og Israel står ikke længere isoleret. Flere arabiske lande — herunder Libanon og Syrien — har åbnet diplomatiske kanaler. Egypten, De Forenede Arabiske Emirater og Saudi-Arabien har alle markeret, at Hamas' tid er forbi. Selv Jordan og Irak tillod Israels brug af deres luftrum.

For første gang i nyere tid blev Hamas presset af den arabiske verden — ikke støttet af den. Iran er trængt i defensiven, Hizbollah tøvede, og de Houthi-angreb (eller "Hizbollah fra Temu", som de er kendt som i Israel), der tidligere skabte global frygt, blev mødt med koordinerede svar fra vestlige og arabiske styrker.

Mellemøsten har lært, hvad Europa har glemt: at fred ikke skabes af dem, der forstår terror, men af dem, der besejrer den.

DE SENESTE DAGES BILLEDER fra Gaza viser, at terror ikke blot korrumperer sjælen — den fortærer sig selv. Efter gidselaftalen henretter Hamas nu sine egne i gaderne, mens kun de mandlige gidsler vender hjem i live. De kvindelige — som verden ellers hævdede at kæmpe for — er forsvundet under påskud, som selv regimets støtter ikke længere tror pa. Og for hver en civil, der frigives, har Israel under internationalt pres været tvunget til at løslade dømte massemordere og gerningsmand bag terror mod børn og familier. Det er ikke symmetri — det er moralsk inversion.

MENS ISRAEL GENFANDT sin styrke, er Europa sunket ned i moralsk desorientering. Antisemitismen er ikke vendt tilbage — den forsvandt aldrig. I Frankrig steg antisemitiske overgreb med 400 procent. I Tyskland med 80 procent. 96 procent af EU's jøder siger, at antisemitisme nu er en del af hverdagen. I Holland og Belgien nåede tallene rekordhøjde i 2024. 

De nye bærere af hadet kalder sig "anti-zionister", men genbruger de gamle fortællinger. De marcherer ikkei støvler, men i akademiske kåber. De råber ikke Sieg Heil, men "From the river to the sea". Men når monumenter til redningen af danske jøder under Holocaust må gemmes væk, eller overvejes helt at fjernes, står skriften utvetydigt på væggen. Antizionisme og antisemitisme kan ikke adskilles. 

Europas medier spiller med. Overskrifterne taler om "kamp mellem parter" og "proportioner", som om et demokrati og en islamistisk milits var moralske modparter. Den journalistiske balance er blevet til etisk blindhed. Mens Jotam Confino matte afgå som korrespondent på TV2, har journalister i DR underskrevet erklæringer imod Israel. 

FLERE EUROPÆISKE REGERINGER — herunder Spanien, Norge og Irland — har valgt at anerkende en palæstinensisk stat midt under krigen. Det er ikke fredsarbejde, men præcedens for, at vold virker. 

Når humanisme bliver selektiv, bliver den meningsløs. Det er ikke så lidt sigende, at samme politikere, der kalder en forsvarskrig for "folkedrab", kalder en deportation for "kidnapning" og "koncentrationslejrophold". Underkastelsen er total.

End ikke kirken stod fast. Otte af landets 10 biskopper valgte i 2024 at fordømme Israels militære fremfærd — men uden ét ord om de jødiske gidsler, de voldtagne kvinder eller Hamas' børnesoldater. Ej heller har de otte biskopper hverken tid, energi eller kristelighed nok til at fordømme de titusindvis af kristne lig, der ligger i Sudan, Nigeria, Syrien eller Egypten. Kristent blod er ikke mere værd, end at det kan glemmes for at udgyde jødisk.

At Europas præster igen fordommer jøder, før de fordømmer antisemitismen, er ikke nyt. Det er en gentagelse. I stedet for at forsvare civilisationens grundprincip – at mennesket har ret til at forsvare sig mod ondskab – faldt også kirkens ledere for fristelsen til moralsk symmetri.

Europas jøder læser rummet hurtigere end deres regeringer. Ansøgninger om Aliyah — udvandring til Israel — fra Frankrig er eksploderet. I Tyskland, Holland og Storbritannien sælges hjem stille, mens børn indskrives på skoler i Tel Aviv. Synagoger har vagter. Skoler har panikknapper. Politikerne har hashtags. Biskopper har bind for øjnene.

Den nye europæiske refleks — at reagere på terror med forståelse og på vold med respekt — bør vække alarmklokker i hele Vesten. Hvis eftergivenhed gøres til princip og svaghed til tolerance, rammer det ikke blot jøderne, men hele den europæiske civilisation.

Når terror igen opleves som et legitimt politisk sprog, vil det ikke stoppe ved Jerusalems mure. De samme kræfter, der truer Israel idag, tester allerede Europas grænser — kulturelt, socialt og fysisk.

Hver indrømmelse til ekstremismen bliver en invitation til mere af det samme.

Den eneste fremtid for et muligt palæstinensisk selvstyre må begynde dér, hvor hadet ender. Som efter Det Tredje Riges fald, som i Rwanda efter folke-mordet, som i Sydafrika efter apartheid: først når befolkningen selv tager ansvar for sine forbrydelser, kan forsoningen begynde.

En kommende Truth and Reconciliation Commission [kommission for sandhed og forsoning] for Palæstina kan kun bygges på en absolut og ubetinget afvisning af terror, had, brutalitet og vold: En total og betingelsesløs kapitulation. Herfra kan en ny begyndelse vokse. Ikke som hævn, men som erkendelse. 

Men den vej blokeres i dag af Europas politik. 

Når lande som Spanien, Irland, Norge, Belgien og Slovenien anerkender en stat, før volden er afvist, lærer de regionen og deres herboende frander, at terror virker. De underminerer den fremtidige forsoning, de havder at støtte, og inviterer samtidig ekstremismen indenfor i deres egne samfund.

Europa står sandsynligvis over for en bølge af ondskab, som selv de arabiske stater var kløgtige nok til at undsige sig.

Europa finder bedemåtten frem i underkastelse.

Israel danser igen.

Sunday, October 19, 2025

Academia Delenda Est: The ivory tower academics who are shaping the future of this country are avowed America-hating commies who have made a fortune decrying capitalism


Academia Is Still the Problem, writes Stephen Kruiser, and It Must Be Destroyed (thanks to Stephen Green), or, in other words: Academia delenda est.

The primary sources of the intellectual and cultural rot that plague the United States of America are still well in place, well funded, and proceeding apace with their mission to ruin everything you and I love. Despite President Trump's monumental efforts to bring America back from the brink of disaster under Joe Biden, the people who crave furthering that disaster still have access to the young minds of America.

The public education indoctrination mill (which I wrote about quite humorously and presciently in Don't Let the Hippies Shower) is, and has been since the early '70s, the cancer that will destroy the Republic. It gets ahold of our youth at a very young age and begins polluting their minds with leftist propaganda. 

The pièce de résistance, however, is what happens to those minds that go to college.  

The ivory tower academics who are shaping the future of this country are avowed America-hating commies who have made a fortune decrying capitalism. They tell impressionable kids that all we hold dear here in the United States is wrong and that the worst actors in the rest of the world are the good guys. 

And they make the kids rack up crippling debt in the process.

In the last two years, we've seen these people defend the indefensible. The campus pro-Palestine Nazis have been allowed to practically resurrect the Brownshirts. 

President Trump has been going after the academic idiots who are trying to wreck the country, holding them accountable for their un-American ways. He has used his power to choke off money to the academic cancer. Money helps the cancer grow, and getting rid of it is the treatment.

 … Everything about academia is anti-American and should not be tolerated. The entire system needs to be destroyed. No matter what President Trump does to restore some patriotic normalcy to America, it's not safe as long as academia has any power. Yes, I want the current academic power structure destroyed …