If you are wondering why you haven’t seen Venezuela's starving mobs on the news, it’s because the country is a Socialist disaster area that was once being used as a model by the left
A mob of starving people advanced on the presidential palace chanting,
“We want food”
reports Sultan Kish's
Daniel Greenfield (gracias por
Instapundit's
Ed Driscoll).
They were met by soldiers and police dispatched by the
tyrant from his lavish palace decorated opulently with a golden sun,
giant rock crystal mirrors, sparkling chandeliers and towering oil
portraits.
The scene wasn’t 19th century France, but 21st century Venezuela.
And if you are wondering why you haven’t seen it on the news, it’s
because Venezuela is a Socialist disaster area that was once being used
as a model by the left. Now it’s a place where the vast majority of
people can’t afford basic food staples and a third are down to two or
fewer meals a day.
Obama laughed and joked with deceased monster Hugo Chavez, who handed
him a copy of the anti-American tract, “Open Veins of Latin America”
that had even been disavowed by its own author. Obama called the book a
“nice gesture”, but Eduardo Galeano, its author, had told an audience
that the left “commits grave errors” when in power.
Venezuela, once a wealthy oil state, where the doctors offering
“universal health care” have no medicine and starving people loot
government stores looking for food, is yet another example. 50 people
are dead in the latest food riots. Their graves are yet another “grave
error” of the left.
Obama has not appeared too concerned at the meltdown in Venezuela.
Unlike Syria, there are no threats of intervention to remove Maduro,
Chavez’s successor, and the rest of the leftist regime illegally
clinging to power while slaughtering Venezuelans, smuggling drugs and
aiding terrorists.
When Hugo Chavez was killed by the wonders of Cuban medicine, a remedy
that American leftists recommend to others while they obtain the best
private health care for their own ailments, Obama offered a vague
statement of support calling Chavez’s passing, “challenging”.
It was certainly that.
Chavez had been none too tightly wound; claiming that capitalism had
destroyed life on Mars, that Jews run the world and that his cancer had
been caused by America, but his successor, Nicolas Maduro is insane.
Maduro claimed that his deceased predecessor appeared to him in the form
of a “little bird” and on a subway wall. He showed off the photo of the
wall on state television while crying.
“Chavez is everywhere, we are Chavez, you are Chavez," he insisted.
Hugo Chavez is indeed everywhere. His portraits cover Venezuela. They’re
a lot easier to find than food. And these days Venezuelans are far more
interested in finding something to put in their mouths.
The left-wing sociologist running the Venezuelan economy doesn’t believe
in inflation. Last year he wrote a pamphlet in which he insisted that
“Inflation does not exist in real life.”
Inflation certainly exists in Venezuela which has seen 500% inflation.
The Socialist regime responded with price controls. When stores and
farmers wouldn’t sell at set prices, soldiers were sent in to take them
over. Crowds initially cheered all the subsidized products. But they
wouldn’t be cheering for long.
After the fun of electronics stores forced to discount televisions at
gunpoint, there were no more televisions. And no more cars. Then no more
toilet paper, milk and other basic necessities.
The Socialist government tried to solve its money problem by printing
more money. But it wasn’t able to pay for the money it wanted to print
because of the inflation which officially did not exist.
Venezuela needs 10 billion bank notes in its new inflationary economy,
more than America, and it can’t pay for them. Or pay for anything else.
It can’t afford to import food and it refuses to pay fair prices at
home. Meanwhile eggs, at the official exchange rate, run to $150,
McDonald’s fries for $126 and a pound of coffee for $85. Socialists may
not believe in inflation, but inflation believes in them.
No wonder the people are starving.
… The military elite receive special food privileges. In a country where
bread and butter have become distant memories for many, the guns used to
oppress the Venezuelan people are paid for with butter. And the people
are fighting back. The government calls its crackdown on starving people
“Operation People’s Liberation”. The people however want to be
liberated from their socialist liberators.
When the Socialist regime responded to electoral defeats by rigging the
Supreme Court and arresting the free market opposition, the street
battles intensified. The “Liberators”, who have the luxury of eating
butter with their bread, are fighting hungry men and women in the
streets of cities. And sometimes it’s the socialist “liberators” who are
forced to retreat from the true people’s liberators.
While the socialists route food through the United Socialist Party of
Venezuela’s CLAP committees to their own supporters, ordinary
Venezuelans are hunting pigeons, and even dogs and cats in the capital.
Before the last election, Chavez said, “If I was from the United States,
I'd vote for Obama.” And the two leaders do have some political and
economic views in common. The fundamental difference is that it took
Venezuela a lot less time to run out of “other people’s money” than
America.
A few years ago, the left-wing site Salon was praising “Hugo Chavez’s
economic miracle” and suggesting that we should follow his example of
nationalizing companies. “Are there any constructive lessons to be
learned from Chavez’s grand experiment with more aggressive
redistribution?” its author wondered.
Someone ought to ask the starving mobs redistributing government food while dodging bullets.
Venezuelan socialists used the familiar language of claiming that
subsidies and free services were human rights. “Health care can’t be
privatized because it is a fundamental human right,” Chavez once
claimed. That should sound familiar. Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton
have said the same thing.
But Venezuela’s universal health care has no actual medicine. Hospitals
have no running water or soap. Victims arrive with gunshots and aren’t
treated until they settle their bill. Babies die routinely.
And it goes without saying that there is no food.
“I doubt that anywhere in the world, except in Cuba, there exists a better health system than this one,” Maduro insists.
Considering how bad actual Cuban medicine is, he’s probably right.
Socialism killed Venezuela. The country has no food, no money, no power,
no health care and no hope. Venezuelans were promised a better life
through government. This is what they received.
There are lessons for us here and they are obvious ones. And that is why
the media has minimized its coverage of a horrific crisis. The people
chanting that they want food are not rebelling against unfeeling
corporations, but a government whose economic policies many on the left
had viewed as a model.
The popularity of Bernie Sanders is based on many of the same empty
promises of freebies for all that made Hugo Chavez such a hit. Venezuela
is a model of how well that works out in real life. Socialism is
increasingly popular in America. Meanwhile in Latin America, socialism
kills babies and drives starving mobs to demand food outside the
presidential palace under the guns of the regime’s soldiers.
It’s an old story, but it’s also a new story because when we forget history, then we are forced to repeat it.