Thursday, May 07, 2009

Fools Face Cretin 

posted by Joe @ 11:49

French fantasy public intellectual and neo-fascist Dieudonné M'Bala M'Bala is seeking office. Like any world view that can’t grasp genuine pluralism of thought, instead of trying to debate and argue with him, the instinct is to bar them legally. Since strengthening the democratic instinct of the society isn’t a high priority, the idea of making certain types of politics unlawful isn’t that much of a leap.

French officials are trying to ban the rabid anti-Zionist and Jew-hating comedian Dieudonne M'Bala M'Bala from fielding candidates in the country’s June regional elections. The comic has been fined at least five times for using terms such as “memorial pornography” when referring to Jews, and he faces a trial this week for inciting hatred against Jews.

Dieudonne’s political partner is Alain Soral, formerly associated with Jean Marie Le Pen’s far-right National Front, which has preached anti-Semitic views and Holocaust denial.

The comedian's political activity has alarmed officials, and Claude Gueant, chief of staff for French President Nicolas Sarkozy, told listeners on two French radio programs that Dieudonne should not be allowed to be active in political campaigns.
Besides befriending Pépé LePen, a man living politically in the 1950s, his partner in this is punching-bag stuntman Alain Soral, a man who in spite of other public stunts tends to advocate his own currency in the public by promoting notions of “European muscular whiteness”. It’s a strange mix of hating the representations of Europe’s allies through cultural anti-Americanism and indulging anti-European nationalist notions like closing borders and propping up French employers for the French, and that old mainstay, anti-Semitism. Convincing idiots that there are greedy Jews hiding under their bed has always worked on the continent before, so we can see opportunists trying it again, and with a great deal of success.
Dieudonne responded by calling Gueant "a good little soldier of the Zionist lobby.” His political partner Soral added, “It's scandalous. What he said and where he said it - on a [Jewish] radio station for one community - shows that the highest levels of the state take their orders from the Zionist lobby in France."

Dieudonne, who is 43 years old and was once an anti-racist, has been involved in European Union elections as a candidate or head of a party since 1997.
Let’s not forget that this guy’s draw was that his act was good for relations between racial and religious communities to diffuse friction through comedy. The concept was so new and limited, it gave him a kind of sainthood from the mainstream. In reality, his comedy has been a sort of small scale version of a Nuremburg rally speech.

That isn’t an exaggeration. As to the traditionalism and going “back to basics” employing what they think is comic in place of simply exciting mobs to break merchant’s windows:
During one recent performance, with Le Pen in the audience, he invited a Holocaust denier to join him on stage in honor of his 80th birthday. Several weeks earlier, Dieudonne presented the Holocaust denier, academic Robert Faurisson, with a "prize for maladaption and impertinence” that was presented by an assistant dressed in a concentration camp uniform with a yellow star.
You’ve [haven’t] come a long way, baby. It appears that only the natives are unable to smell the funk. Either that or they take more comfort in ignoring it.


|



Wednesday, May 06, 2009

Behold the Spirited Folkways of the Natives at Play 

posted by Joe @ 16:47

Veuillez installer Flash Player pour lire la vidéo


Note the sporting peasantry’s colorful colloquialisms and curious garb. Such elan. They deserve a cultural exception!


|



Euro-think 

posted by Joe @ 10:52

It always seems to need a new idol to stick pins in.

Hurriyet, Turkey
Dick Cheney's Torture Logic is 'Deeply Offensive'

"The reason U.S. policy is so important to us is that our own struggle to rein in heinous practices in Turkey is directly related to the standards set in Washington. … Cheney’s logic is that of the Spanish Inquisition. It is deeply offensive."
First of all, they aren’t struggling. Second of all, Turks have been torturing for virtually no reason for decades, if not centuries. OBVIOUSLY George Bush’s 2000 election can be implicated in the Armenian genocide.

Take that Vice:
The systematic and widespread nature of torture in Turkey puts nearly anyone at risk of being tortured, Amnesty International said today as it released its report Turkey: An end to torture and impunity is overdue!.

Amnesty International today concluded that the geographic spread of torture allegations, the range of potential victims and the number of testimonies the organization received, point to torture being systematic and widespread in Turkey. This, despite the European Union a year ago identifying the fight against torture as a priority for Turkey.
Torture is ubiquitous in Turkey, and goes ignored. There are trying to dus tit under the rug for the sake of what the neighbors might see, but little else, especially because there has been little or no logic at all to the torture that has taken place in Turkey long before they started to pretend that George Bush somehow darkened the earth for the first time in human history. Randomly looking at a 1998 report, now that we’ve established that W could travel through time and space to “enlightened” Turkey:
At least 209 children were tortured in 1998. Most of the reported cases of tortured children were detained on charges of such crimes as "theft." However, as is known, torture is a widespread practice in detentions for political charges.
For heavens’ sake, these Barbarians that have up until a few years ago not permitted Kurds to speak their own language in public, a medieval policy, on top of continuing to try to convince the world that all those Armenians “must have all just moved to L.A.” has no basis to lecture anyone.



The grand European idea of course, is to punish the former Adminstration for a war to topple THEIR favorite dictator, a man who tortured a huge number of his own citizens for no reason at all.


|



Tuesday, May 05, 2009

Shock Post: Horrid corporations actually pay taxes 

posted by Georges @ 22:22

Late nights and Google can make strange bedfellows for bloggers. Imagine the surprise at finding this letter regarding the increase in revenues (ie. taxes) received from US corporations circa 2003 to 2006:

Dear Mr. Chairman:

In response to your letter of May 11, 2007, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has reviewed the available data and analyzed the sources and underlying causes of the growth in revenues since 2003. This analysis shows that the overall increase in revenues as a share of gross domestic product (GDP) since 2003 is disproportionately accounted for by increases in corporate income tax revenues.
The letter is from the then head of the CBO, now President Obama's Director of OMB, to the Chairman of the US Senate Budget Committee. So, during those years two interesting facts come to light:

1) The increase in tax revenues is "disproportionately accounted for by increases in corporate income tax revenues", and
2) An increasing GDP may just have accounted for higher tax revenues coming in to government despite then lower rates of taxation.

Shocking
(Editor's note: This post does not address the other fact on the table. That which demonstrates corporations do not actually pay tax even if the marginal rate is 100%. Corporations collect taxes from individuals and pass them along to government. It is individuals who actually pay corporate taxes in some form of higher prices, lower wages and/or lower returns on capital.)

|



It Can’t Be! It Can’t Be! 

posted by Joe @ 21:00

Those raving, frothing Republican types (at National Geographic) have it all wrong!

Nonetheless the piper must be paid, the incantation must be read, the recitations of the ways in which comrade Stalin loves us must be said before the trial can go on:

"[Global warming] skeptics tend to leap forward," said Mike Lockwood, a solar terrestrial physicist at the University of Southampton in the U.K. (Get the facts about global warming.)

He and other researchers are therefore engaged in what they call "preemptive denial" of a solar minimum leading to global cooling.
That CAN’T be it! There's GOT to be a human angle there!


|



In the world of Zinn, things never evolve, economies don't recover, victims never overcome adversity, and white men are always to blame 

posted by Erik @ 20:53

Because [A People's History of the United States, 1492-Present] is the only book on American history that many students will read, Howard Zinn has become one of the most dangerous men in America
writes Bettina Esser;
the book's overarching thesis could best be summarized in this way: "America is not a republic but an empire controlled by white men, but only certain white men, and its heroes are anti-establishment protestors and those in the trenches of class warfare."

This book is a bestseller [only] because it is required reading in most colleges and an increasing number of high schools. … In the world of Zinn, things never evolve, economies don't recover, victims never overcome adversity, and white men are always to blame. Once a person is labeled as "evil," there is no personal redemption. "Robber barons" are not recognized for their own personal achievements or the risks and losses they endured, but only for their manipulation of people and money. In Zinn's economic view, where everybody is out for the most he can get, there is no room for voluntarism, charity, or philanthropy.

…In the world of Zinn, these were the only things that Columbus, Jackson, or Roosevelt ever did, and no other actions in their lives could compensate for their sins. In his chronology, the reader goes from one unpleasant climactic event to the next, and nothing good happens in the interim.

|



Licking the Boot That Kicks You 

posted by Joe @ 20:01

It’s what Europeans do best. Better than chiding other westerners about not being as “culturally European” in the trivial matters of culture as they are – cuisine, urbanism, work ways, and the like, as though those pet peeves was the only remaining features of a culture that one is permitted to defend in a miasma of post-modern emptiness.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s article published in the UK’s The First Post notes:

Take anti-Semitism in Europe. The sensitivity and guilt Europeans feel about the Holocaust is comparable to the sensitivity and guilt that Americans feel towards black Americans. A decade or two ago, it was unthinkable for Jews to be slandered openly and be targeted for no other reason than their Jewishness.

Today, in the name of Islam, synagogues are vandalised. There are open denials of the Holocaust. There is an active network of Muslim organisations lobbying to curtail or even get rid of Israel. There are incidents of Jews being harassed, beaten, even killed. All this is met with grim silence and rationalisations that it's not really anti-Semitic but anti-Israel. Can you imagine anything like this happening today in America to black people and it being met with silence?
Europe is a continent where they know well enough that being servile doesn’t bring you peace, or for that matter leaves you in peace for any length of time.
It is this state of affairs that makes Christopher Caldwell's book Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration and the West (Allen Lane, £17.99), which opens with the sentence, "Western Europe became a multi-ethnic society in a fit of absence of mind," a chilling read.

[ ... ]

Caldwell discusses this theme in an interesting light: he does not overlook the Europeans who feel that Islam is a danger to European values but asks, "How can you fight for something you cannot define?" And this is Europe's problem - insecurity about who we are, what our various flags mean, why, with every turn, we spend less and less on the military.


|



Argument Solved, Problem Ignored 

posted by Joe @ 17:05

And barbarism embraced as something requiring understanding.

Socialists Are Fools But Not All Fools Are Socialists
Says George Handerly
It has become fashionable to present reports on piracy that are wrapped in a tranquilizer. It is suggested that the solution of the problem is in Somalia. Save Somalia (throw money at it?) and all will be hanky-dory. One is tempted to suspect that the popularity of the mantra has to do with the trick of attaching an otherwise threateningly soluble problem to a precondition that cannot be met. The benefit is that, succumbing to the West’s luxurious self-doubts, a good reason is given to persist in doing the unreasonable. Thereafter it becomes easy to desist from solving the solvable.
It’s all about leftists making themselves feel smart, hearing the sound of their own voices saying “ah, but it’s more complicated than that”, not as a way of NOT trying to solve the problem, but subconsciously admitting that they will never, ever try to bring stability or civilization to anything they choose to grace with an opinion, despite the “struggle for global social well being” they keep promising – something they have never once provided to anyone who didn’t vote for them.

However all that misery there is out there DOES have a use to them – they need humanity’s open wounds to stay open for the sake of their solving of arguments.


|



The Belgian Curtain (Europe after Communism) 

posted by Joe @ 16:27

I rarely recommend or review books here, but will in the general interest point one out from time to time, especially free and timely e-books, which are a boon to the light traveler, outdoor loafer, or both. Coming across such things is often all it takes to spark ones’ interest, often with a tangentially related title or subject, so here we are...

This week, I recommend Sam Vaknin’s The Belgian Curtain, Europe after Communism. He muses freely on the Europe’s futile internal tugs of war, EU, NATO, and provides an accessible overview of the contrasts between eastern and western Europe in the political “concept of self” that generally dominate those cultural spaces.

A sample:

Though the EU is the new and aspiring members' biggest trading partner and foreign investor - it has, to borrow from Henry Kissinger, no "single phone number". While France is enmeshed in its Byzantine machinations, Spain and Britain are trying to obstruct the ominous re-emergence of French-German dominance.

By catering to popular aversion of America's policies, Germany's beleaguered Chancellor, Gerhard Schroeder, is attempting to score points domestically even as the German economy is imploding.

The euro-Atlantic structures never looked worse. The European Union is both disunited and losing its European character. NATO has long been a dysfunctional alliance in search of a purpose. For a while, Balkan skirmishes provided it with a new lease on life. But now the Euro-Atlantic alliance has become the Euro-Atlantic divide.

The only clear, consistent and cohesive voice is America's. The new members of NATO are trying to demonstrate their allegiance - nay, obsequiousness - to the sole identifiable leader of the free world. France's bid at European helmsmanship failed because both it and Russia are biased in favor of the current regime in Iraq. French and Russian firms have signed more than 1700 commercial contracts with Saddam's murderous clique while their British and American competitors were excluded by the policies of their governments.
Those interest in blogs like this one should find something of interest here.


|



"You are either with us or against us" 

posted by Georges @ 13:22

We do seem to recall a certain angst (rightfully so) in ever-thoughtful leftish circles regarding such absolutist statements when made by the previous US administration regarding a different topic.

Will the lefty angst repeat itself now:

As President Obama said, "If financial institutions won't cooperate with us, we will assume that they are sheltering money in tax havens and act accordingly."
So much for those quaint quirks of American jurisprudence. Little things like "due process" and "innocent until proven guilty". Never forget, fairness now trumps all.

|



Oh my.... 

posted by Georges @ 05:34

It all goes so terribly wrong around the 5:50 mark




|



Monday, May 04, 2009

Obama: an expert in secret operations and subversion 

posted by Erik @ 20:01

All these data show that Obama doesn’t come from nowhere. He’s an expert in secret operations and subversion. He’s been recruited for a very specific task.
Guess who is the author of that statement (while adding that Hillary Clinton is a… "fundamentalist Christian" and that "the economic crisis … will lead to a dislocation of the United States and the end of the State of Israel.")

|



Sure, we Know how to Speak the Language of the Deal 

posted by Joe @ 11:39

The Politburo here at ¡No Pasarán! has unanimously resolved to make a special offer for Denis Boyles: we’ll flog anything you write to our adoring proletariat if you add an umlaut, dropped vowels, and improbably accents to your last name.

Not only does it make one heck of a marketing gimmick, it seems quite oddly to seem less “anglo-saxon-ness” while appearing brutally teutonic to at least a few chicks, and also strangely more pangalactically European, yet somehow inferring “globalness” by stroking the euro-chicken. Thanks a bunch, mijnheer Dnis’ Böylės. Just watching the confusion in trying to pronounce it makes one so feels oneself cosmopolitan!

Sir, we here at ¡N-P! are determined to make you better known than Häagen-Dazs. We'll install a dipthong at a later date.


|



Sunday, May 03, 2009

World’s Stupidest Anti-Capitalist 

posted by Joe @ 17:05

As if there was a way to grade them...

Anticipating the revolutionary wave of people agreeing with them, roving bands of masked anti-capitalist paranoiacs roved the streets of DC in and around last weekend’s IMF leaders’ meeting.

As they are wont to do, they destroy property, something they believe should be the “peoples’“ property, but like whatever. They chose to vandalize a pair of ATM machines, even though the proletariat trying to withdraw from ‘the man’ the pittance of their blood, sweat, and tears. Oddly enough they hit up Amalgamated Bank, a.k.a. “Labor’s Bank” or as the banking choice of the non-profit political profiteers of the activism racket, which statistically makes it the favorite bank of the Suffering Sisters of Sappho.



Even the special must suffer to make a perfect society, where everything is free. It’s the part about what growing your own organic food would do to the collective farm that I still can’t get.


|



Saturday, May 02, 2009

Eichmanns. Meet the Eichmanns. They’re the Modern Stone-Age Family. 

posted by Joe @ 16:35

Anyone who thinks that there is a “big book of international law” somewhere before which they can kneel is naively craving an international autocracy. Not only is it the furthest thing one could have from even permitting any sort of “diversity” and removes whatever control individuals have over their lives, the same adolescent minds invoking these imaginary controls of people and societies usually also get worked up because they think that there is a “hate crime” law somewhere in that mythical legal tome where the personalities and proponents of opinions or lifestyles that THEY hate can be prosecuted. Trying to reach so deep as to control people’s souls, they even want to make crimes of emotions and thoughts that they can’t abide. Nonetheless you have to complement them on their diaphanous (fair trade) scarves and admire them for being ‘progressives’.


|



Please, Monsieur Obama: It's one thing to visit France, and it's a whole other thing to actually live there 

posted by Erik @ 09:33



(Merci à Véronique de Rugy et à… Hervé)

|



Friday, May 01, 2009

May Day, it's a wrap 

posted by Georges @ 23:59

Well, another May Day has come and gone. We await to see if this is the year in which the oppressed masses threw off the manacles of their feudal bosses:



Probably not....

|



Beating our plowshares into bankshares 

posted by Georges @ 16:16

The mindless left never misses a beat when it comes to cutting (real not rate of growth) the profligate spending habits of our governmentalist betters. The well-worn bromides of "kicking the elderly out of hospitals" and "punishing children" never seem to be balanced with the actual outcomes of the policies venerated by the evermore statist tax-gobblers.

"Where would you cut then?" is the wild-eyed bleat du jour coming from our reality-deprived brothers and sisters on the statist left. Expenses for officials, public-sector salaries, etc are a mere trifle. How about we start with this over-flowing goody-bag:

Royal landowners and multinational companies were among the biggest beneficiaries of the EU's €55 billion farm aid budget in 2008, a new EU transparency law has shown.

In France, which alone scooped €10.4 billion of the pot, the Doux Group, which sells chicken products to over 130 countries worldwide, was the biggest single recipient on €62 million.

Major food companies Nestle and Tate & Lyle were the largest UK winners on around €1 million each.

British aristocrats, who command significant personal fortunes, also pocketed sizeable amounts of EU cash. The Queen received around €530,000. The Duke of Westminster got €540,000. Prince Charles took €180,000.

In Ireland, frozen food giant Greencore Group received the largest subsidy on €83 million. The Irish Dairy Board Co-op came second on €6.5 million. Kerry Ingredients Ireland was third on €5 million.
Come to think of it, if that oh so idyll of returning to a pastoral existence pays so well, this porky may be worth keeping. Who says incentives do not matter?

|



One-way street continues 

posted by Georges @ 12:12

Tim Worstall befouls the May Day punchbowl with this find:

Businesses’ ability to recover overpaid tax would be curtailed by measures in yesterday’s finance bill, experts warned.

They said Revenue & Customs was trying to draw a line under an era that saw it hit with a series of multibillion refund claims.

The little-noticed proposals – originally tucked away in a note to the Budget – mean that from April 2010, taxpayers would no longer be able to sue Revenue & Customs in the High Court to reclaim overpaid corporation, income and capital gains tax.
Despite those who feel that taxation does not change the behaviour of the individual, the first thought is of course ...... how to get around this. The initial thought which comes to mind is to pay the absolute minimum possible due. Far easier (yet still painful) to write a cheque covering the difference than it is to try and claw back what is rightfully yours from government.

|



NYT celebrates May Day by sticking it to the common man 

posted by Georges @ 11:59

Unfortunately the storyline is not quite as tidy as some would like. L'antagoniste is not the selfish, greedy, money-grubbing, capitalistic, Hobbesian swine which we all know and love. No, our story revolves around the lucid, prosaic, nuanced, all-knowing, all-caring, pious merchants of wisdom who strive for a world free of outcomes and responsibility, as long as they get theirs first:

The New York Times Co (NYT.N), which bought the Globe for $1.1 billion in 1993, threatened at the start of April to shut the money-losing, award-winning broadsheet unless the paper's 13 unions agree by Friday to $20 million in concessions.

As the deadline approaches, the future of one of America's most acclaimed regional newspapers looks unclear, illustrating deepening problems for an industry that has few answers for an accelerating, long-term shift of advertising to the Internet.

Negotiations for a buyer, some suggest, could begin if the Times Co wins union concessions, which could include pay cuts of as much as 20 percent, removal of seniority rules and lifetime job guarantees, and millions of dollars in cuts to company contributions for retirement and health plans.
No doubt the story will appear in the NYT under some version of the "Workers feel anxiety as corporate fat cats close up shop" headline. Never fret, our May Day story of class struggle does indeed have a happy ending, for some:

According to the New York Times proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, corporate president and CEO Janet L. Robinson received a total compensation package valued at $5.58 million in 2008, up well over a million from the $4.14 million she received in 2007, and the $4.4 million she received in 2006.

Robinson's $1 million base salary has remained the same for three years. In 2008, Robinson's total compensation included, in addition to her base salary: $1.6 million in stock awards, $1.5 million in options, a $35,000 bonus, $562,500 from the non-equity incentive plan, $898,171 from the "Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings," and "other compensation" of $46,368.

A number of NYT staffers contacted said that there was considerably more resentment voiced on the newsroom floor, and in newspaper guild meetings, about Robinson's pay than about compensation awarded to Arthur Sulzberger Jr., the NYT board chairman and publisher.

Staffers noted that even though Sulzberger received bonuses and other compensation more than doubling to $2.4 million his base salary of $1,087,000, his total compensation package has declined substantially over the past three years from $3.4 million in 2007 and $4.4 million in 2006. In addition to his 2008 base salary, Sulzberger's total compensation included a bonus of $38,045, stock awards of $54,443, option awards of $29,832, a non-equity compensation plan distribution of $597,850, a change in pension plan valuation and non-qualified deferred compensation worth $559,826, and $48,878 in "other compensation," according to the proxy.
And they all lived happily everafter.

|



Oh, THAT New Media!!! 

posted by Joe @ 11:03

Maybe it isn’t news because it isn’t a pretzel.

From our bulging “imagine if this happened to Bush” file: Obama bumps his head in public. It is NOT considered a news item by aggregators, even when it’s on the wires.





Bush chokes on a pretzel in private six years ago: 110,000 hits from frothing loons wanking off about it in the hateful glee of those raised in a barn.


|



How Were Afghanistan's Taliban Overthrown in 2001? By the U.S. Army? Not at all! By the Mujaheddin (!) 

posted by Erik @ 10:03

Thanks to Le Monde (and to Rémy Ourdan's full-page article in the organ of official opinion and of the ruling class under a mocking title), the truth is now out: in late 2001, the Taliban were not vanquished by the Americans, but by… the Mujaheddin.
Déception [en Afghanistan] envers l'armée américaine et ses alliés, qui se sont déployés dans le pays sans que personne en comprenne vraiment la raison, les talibans ayant été vaincus dès fin 2001 par les Moudjahidins.
In order to denigrate America (at least under Bush) as well as its armed forces, anything is allowed — including the rewriting of history.

In that perspective, we also learn that the year 2008 was a "nightmare for the American army." Now, I understood that — if anything — the year 1944 was a "nightmare for the American army." And the year 1917 was a "nightmare for the American army." And the year 1862. And the year 1775.

But thank God: we have — and the French population has — Le Monde!

|

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been pre-authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, economic, scientific, social, art, media, and cultural issues. The 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material that may exist on this site is provided for under U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Section 107, material on this site is distributed without profit to persons interested in such information for research and educational purposes. If you want to use any copyrighted material that may exist on this site for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. // AVIS : En vertu de l'article L. 122-5 du Code de Propriété Intellectuelle, ce site Internet peut contenir des citations dont l'usage n'aura pas reçu l'autorisation du détenteur ou de la détentrice du droit d'auteur. La présentation de ces citations se fait dans le but de faciliter la découverte de divers sujets politiques, économiques, scientifiques, sociaux, artistiques, médiatiques ou encore culturels. L'article L. 122-5 du Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle dispose et autorise « les analyses et courtes citations justifiées par le caractère critique, polémique, pédagogique, scientifique ou d'information de l'oeuvre à laquelle elles sont incorporées ». A contrario, les emprunts qui excéderont les dispositions du « droit de citation », devront obtenir l'autorisation du détenteur ou de la détentrice du droit d'auteur.