A Dutch TV jury has found Osama bin Laden not guilty of the Sept. 11 attacksstates The Hollywood Reporter's Scott Roxborough (dank u wel to our goed ould vrijnd Benjamin Duffy).
In the conclusion Wednesday night to the show "Devil's Advocate" on Dutch public broadcaster Nederland 2, the jury of two men and three women, along with the studio audience, ruled there was no proof bin Laden was the mastermind behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in 2001.And who is this ultra-brilliant Spong fellow? Isn't somebody who is willing to stand up for some of the worst criminals — even if he is misguided — at least on the right track? No, because — in typical liberal invert-the-victims-and-the-criminals logic — (italics mine)
…star defense attorney Gerard Spong standing up for some of the world's worst criminals … was able to convince the jury that bin Laden's connection to Sept. 11 was a product of "Western propaganda." The jury also ruled there was insufficient evidence to prove bin Laden was the real head of terrorist network al-Qaida. However, the jury did rule that bin Laden is a "terrorist who has misused Islam."
Spong has been … supporting legal action against anti-immigrant politician Geert Wilders.Would it be unfair to say that Osservatore's observation about one typical European would apply equally well to the self-important pieces of… I mean to the likes of Mijnheer Spong?
…he only rages against Americans … as he knows they are unlikely to strike physically!!! He'll go home and meditate as to why the Moslem "racaille" act the way they do and will find forgiveness……for they know not what they do.