|
Site Mobile/WAP About "Che Mickey" à propos de "Che Mickey" No Pasaran on Twitter Nominated for: ![]() ![]() ![]()
Behind the Façades in France: What expats and the mainstream media (French and American alike) fail to notice (or fail to tell you) about French attitudes, principles, values, and official positions…
La France Dissident Frogman
Europa Barcepundit
America and Elsewhere Atlas
Iraq and Vicinity Iraq the Model
Books/Bouquins:
Cartoons:
Education:
MiF links:
Archives |
Tuesday, April 07, 2009How Green is thy Envy?, Part LXVIIposted by Joe @ 22:23
The left wing idiots at Marianne, in a desperate bid to define everything foreign in the same way the worst of French society always have (instead of letting others define themselves) has their moment of cynicism after the O-gasm. Except for the fact that they’re at heart a bunch of ignorant and insensitive boors pretending that their hyperventilating somehow hakes them look smart. ![]() The comments about the cartoon are even more amusing. The readers take the various moments of anti-social destruction and marauding in France as some sort of natural outcome of the US election, or more to the point, the fact that they though about the subject. Among the delusional as well as the likes of the readers of Marianne2, thinking about a subject give rise to events in meatspace, I suppose.
We are helpless, please helpposted by Georges @ 18:18
Acting out should never be encouraged in children:Almost half of French people believe it is acceptable for workers facing layoffs to lock up their bosses, according to an opinion poll published on Tuesday.
No Longer Is It the Case, Thanks to You-Know-Who, That Foreign Allies of Bush's America Have to Fear… Looking at Themselves in the Mirror (!!)posted by Erik @ 14:28
I think that it is important for Europe to understand that even though I'm now President and George Bush is no longer President, al Qaeda is still a threatGood thing to know, Mr. President (thanks for the info)… Prior to his visit to Prague and to Ankara, the Apologizer-in-Chief had passed through Strasbourg, where his handlers (does he actually have any?!) couldn't even get the translation of "good afternoon" right (if Bon après-midi ever existed, it went out of fashion, oh, about a couple of centuries ago) and where — uh, oh, America — he said that he was jealous about [government-funded] high-speed rail and the nice trains here. Devant les étudiants de Strasbourg, il a parlé d'Abou Ghraib, l'ancienne prison américaine en Irak, un nom qui ne revient pas souvent dans le discours public américain, en essayant de les convaincre qu'ils peuvent désormais se joindre aux Etats-Unis sans avoir peur de "se regarder dans la glace". Thanks to Barack Obama, says… Barack Obama (in Strasbourg, as recounted by Corine Lesnes and in other Le Monde articles), foreigners such as Europeans need no longer be afraid to… look at themselves in the mirror.![]()
Control makes you freeposted by Georges @ 14:22
No doubt readers of this blog are aware of the never-sated thirst of governmentalists and statists to control evermore the choices and decisions of the individual. Fortunately there sometimes (note, sometimes) are gems to report:The local pub in Groningen has moved its bar and serving staff to a small storeroom, designating what was its main bar area as the smoking zone.That really is the problem for the controlling-class of governmentalists and statists. No matter how hard they work to help the masses there is always some horrid individual out there who sticks it back up them. How dare they!
Monday, April 06, 2009The Queen Glared at Michelle Obama With a Black Lookposted by Erik @ 16:32
America's mainstream media would have the Obama/Queen meeting occur in good humor and friendship and fun, with highly exaggerated acounts of a touch that, au contraire, was emblematic of the leaders' friendship.Not if you believe the French mainstream media (usually as leftish, if not more, than their American cousins)… Corine Lesnes and Marc Roche write in Le Monde that à la stupéfaction du protocole, Michelle a eu l'audace de lui poser la main sur le dos. Elle a eu droit à un regard assassin de la reine.Only out of a desire for indulgence, the Queen blamed the faux pas on jet lag… (Meanwhile, Le Monde's readers were busy forgiving the faux pas, finding it cute — oui, vous comprenez, ce n'est pas George W Bush — and even testifying that they had already watched a totally uncontroversial video of the meeting three times…)
Pronunciation lessonposted by Georges @ 05:55
Given the silence from the Tax Justice Network regarding this topic:Whistleblowing MPs lifted the lid last night on how Commons expenses have been fiddled, allowing them to obtain thousands of pounds without submitting a single receipt.It is rather obvious that when pronouncing the Tax Justice Network acronym ("T-J-N") the "J" is silent. Surely the poor dears have someone in the network who can perform research regarding the abuse of real tax monies by government officials. Silence is thy name.
Sunday, April 05, 2009A clueposted by Georges @ 01:34
While this particular set of circumstances is playing out in the United States the theory applies to any country anywhere in which the government has/is injecting itself into the private sector under the guise of assistance.Stuart Varney reports: Here's a true story first reported by my Fox News colleague Andrew Napolitano (with the names and some details obscured to prevent retaliation). Under the Bush team a prominent and profitable bank, under threat of a damaging public audit, was forced to accept less than $1 billion of TARP money. The government insisted on buying a new class of preferred stock which gave it a tiny, minority position. The money flowed to the bank. Arguably, back then, the Bush administration was acting for purely economic reasons. It wanted to recapitalize the banks to halt a financial panic.So what is happening here? Mr. Varney provides a partial answer: My answer: The government wants to control the banks, just as it now controls GM and Chrysler, and will surely control the health industry in the not-too-distant future. Keeping them TARP-stuffed is the key to control. And for this intensely political president, mere influence is not enough. The White House wants to tell 'em what to do. Control. Direct. Command.This is indeed true. But what else? An educated guess informs that those in control will want to make those banks holding TARP funds as absolutely uncomfortable as possible in a bid to get the very same banks to agree to any terms in order to disgorge the TARP funds. Mr. Varney rightly suggests these may come in the form of compensation caps, changed lending practices, etc. True, but this brings us back to our largely unanswered question from the other day: What happens to the TARP funds once repaid by the banks to the government?One can easily imagine a scenario under which the banks get the screws put to them so tightly that they will not only subscribe to the terms above but also the creation of some new, and permanent, set of governmental programmes which dole out the repaid TARP funds, or a big enough portion of them, for all kinds of social re-engineering programmes. The governmentalist mindset will think, "We created this new money, why waste it by simply closing out the TARP programme?" The banks of course will line up squealing with praise for these new programmes and the need to use these repaid TARP funds for the "better social good". And why wouldn't they line up to do so, they will have repaid the TARP funds and removed the government substantially off their backs. The fact that some new social re-engineering programmes have been created and foisted onto the tax-payer in perpetuity makes no difference to the banks, they got rid of their problem. The same rationale goes for healthcare "reform" as well. Businesses with large healthcare costs will equally praise any governmentally run programme (paid for, of course, by the tax-payer) which removes a huge cost off their books. When you hear some phrase such as "social betterment" you should smell money. So, asked again: As financial institutions (and non) in the US begin to pay their TARP funds back, where will those funds go? These funds were conjured last year and injected into these firms, to be paid back with interest. Will the repaid funds merely zero out the conjured funds leaving only the interest bit to go into the general funding of the US government?Mr. Varney has graciously provided another clue. As a side note, shed no tears for the big business/banking community. For years that class has hedged their bets and only given lip-service to offering resistance to more and more government and higher and higher taxes. Perhaps now they are learning their lesson as to what happens when you do not stand up for free markets and capitalism in a legitimate and strong fashion.
Saturday, April 04, 2009We Are Red, We Are White, We Are Danish Dynamite!posted by Erik @ 14:59
![]()
Can't Say the California Dude Ain't Got a Point: The Constitution's Right to Show One's Perfectly Toned Upper Limbs Shall Not Be Infringedposted by Erik @ 13:40
writes Skip Kilmartin of El Sobrante, California, as he points out to The Economist (a typical lay-off-the-Obamas-or-you're-nothing-but-a-sorehead article, alas) that there is one area in which criticism of Michelle Obama is off-bounds (thanks to the Bill of Writes). Being familiar with constitutional law, perhaps Barack Obama could put this particular fashion controversy surrounding his wife to rest by referring to the second amendment’s right to bare arms.
All you need is a brush-up and a bit of water on the back of the neck, all betterposted by Georges @ 12:12
As mentioned previously, the dog-whistle portion of the recently concluded G20 meetings included laying the groundwork and pre-financing for the UK's inevitable crawl to the IMF pay window. This update brings the situation into clearer focus. While the writing is yet to be on the wall, rest assured the paint is indeed being prepared:The G20 agreed this week to establish a new scheme, controlled by the IMF, which countries of all backgrounds can go to if they are experiencing financial problems.One difference of course is a visit to the spa usually does not end in tears and misery. As to the shame of the forthcoming situation, the indefatigable Tim Worstall delivers the prescient verdict with trademark élan.
There has been "arrogance" and élites have "been dismissive, even derisive"? Sounds like a description of US history lessons taught by leftists…posted by Erik @ 07:26
"There have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive": The Apologizer-in-Chief's words actually sound like a description of the American history courses taught be leftists around the world today (both inside and outside the United States)…
During their meeting in Strasbourg, Nicolas Sarkozy refuses to send more men to Afghanistan — notice the difference in (what turns out to be) the rewritten title (Les sujets abordés par Nicolas Sarkozy et Barack Obama) and the initial one (shall we call the more descriptive title the "cruder" one, which more diplomatic editors toned down?), still visible in the article's URL (sarkozy-confirme-a-obama-son-refus-d-envoyer-des-troupes-supplementaires-en-afghanistan) — and there ain't much Barack Obama can do about it, now that the Apologizer-in-Chief been so busy raving on and on about America's arrogance and how his administration is a step in the direction of multilateralism and now that he has been so busy showing he is "eine Guttermensch" by reason of… his incessant smile.(But, hey, what can he say; maybe Carla didn't appreciate the iPod or the 25 Zone 1 DVDs… In any event, the Daily Mail has a number of photos…) Meanwhile, Investor's Business Daily tries to give the Apologizer- and Charmer-in-Chief a basic history lesson. News reports quoted French men and women hailing the first African-American president of the United States as a hopeful sign for global racial reconciliation.
Money-grubbing swine try to bust union...posted by Georges @ 01:03
...with a twist of course:
The New York Times Co has threatened to shut The Boston Globe unless the newspaper's unions agree to $20 million in concessions, the Globe reported on Friday, quoting union leaders.Heartless capitalistic bastards. The next anti-Wal Mart screed on the opinion pages of the NYT will no doubt be carefully crafted with a healthy dose of nuance. With the Guardian using tax havens and the New York Times now attempting to bust unions, who knows what is next for our betters in the client media.
Friday, April 03, 2009The baying mob could not be reached for commentposted by Georges @ 16:35
Just a few weeks after retention bonuses at American International Group became a national scandal, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two mortgage-financing giants that the government rescued last fall, have outlined plans to pay an additional $159 million in bonuses to retain employees in 2009 and 2010, on top of the nearly $51 million already paid out last year.
Anything Wrong in These Pictures?…posted by Erik @ 13:44
There's no inconsistency whatsoever here, of course (and aren't you silly to think so?!)… Michelle Obama will not curtsy to the Queen of Great Britain (listen to French journalist Agnès Poirier at 1:00) and otherwise bow to protocol, but her husband will bow to the King of Saudi Arabia…
Thursday, April 02, 2009Those in the know aren't talkingposted by Georges @ 19:37
Viewed another way, Gordon Brown may just be making sure the funding will be there when the UK comes rattling the tin cup. If so, a coup for the PM ...... the financing has already been pre-arranged:The most concrete measures relate to support for the International Monetary Fund, which has emerged as a "first responder" in this global crisis, making emergency loans to dozens of countries.
Just curiousposted by Georges @ 18:52
A legit set of queries for those smarter than we. As financial institutions (and non) in the US begin to pay their TARP funds back, where will those funds go? These funds were conjured last year and injected into these firms, to be paid back with interest. Will the repaid funds merely zero out the conjured funds leaving only the interest bit to go into the general funding of the US government?
Or, will these repaid funds (in toto, principal and interest) become "real" and permanent funds going into the general funding of the US government and doled out forever?
Wajda's "Katyn" Is Criticized for Having the Audacity to Juxtapose the Nazis and the Sovietsposted by Erik @ 14:37
Le Monde criticizes — in a weaselly manner ("Il faut savoir toutefois que, évoquant des sujets sensibles, Katyn encourt deux types de critiques") — Andrzej Wajda's Katyn for — for what? For the Polish movie's back-to-back justaposition of the Nazis and the Soviets as predators of the national territory!Russians assassinate 12,000 people with a bullet in the neck — not to speak of their (innumerable) other crimes, inside as well as outside Russia — and one does not have the right to compare the Soviets to the Nazis?! A filmmaker does not have the right to conceive (what Piotr Smolar calls) "an anti-Soviet bomb" ?! Are they joking, or what?! The Yanks have been castigated — and how many times?! — for far less than that! It would seen that Stéphane Courtois wrote his book for nothing.Ce film peut aussi jouer son rôle sur la question de la mémoire, qui divise l'Europe : à l'Ouest, on garde une image positive du communisme pendant la guerre ; à l'Est, on a le sentiment d'avoir été abandonné et enfermé pendant quarante-cinq ans ; et dans une Russie hypernationaliste, le communisme redevient une période glorieuse.Update: Adam Michnik a été "fortement surpris de lire la critique [que Le Monde] a faite de Katyn, le dernier film d'Andrzej Wajda" et de la "troublante ignorance" qu'on trouve dans ladite critique…
French Kids Are Improving Their English — Even Their English (or American) Intonation — But Not Thanks to the Government and Its Schools…posted by Erik @ 08:30
…les ados qui sont accros aux séries à succès telles que "Skins", "Gossip Girl",Thus writes Sylvie Kerviel in Le Monde about teens — "ado(lescent)s" — who cannot wait for their favorite Hollywood shows to come (dubbed) to French TV and prefer watching them (in English) on the web. Anne Eaunîmes testifies: J'ai un score de 274/300 au TOEFL, et j'avoue que le fait de savoir par coeurs quelques saisons de Friends y a un peu contribué… Meanwhile, the French are up in arms over the (English) change in name of Lyon's aéroport Saint-Exupéry (price for the change: only 200,000 euros — thanks to [pardon, merci à] RV); and, writes Pascale Santi, France's schools have been invaded by political correctness, where one must no longer say cantine (cafeteria) but restaurant scolaire (school restaurant)… Leading one reader to recall the term that he and his friends had for that institution (while pointing out the obvious reason behind kids' delight with Mickey D's):
Oh Mo.....posted by Georges @ 08:08
As President Obama renegotiates the terms of American leadership this week in Europe, those of us left at home struggle to get over our affluenza.The last memo I received on the subject was all about how affluenza was a modern day scourge which would be the undoing of mankind. Struggle? Maureen my dear, per the left we should be absolutely celebrating it's demise.
Wednesday, April 01, 2009An Innocent Man in the Land of Lucid Critics of Those Clueless Americans' Wild West Tactics Is the Victim of a Lynch Mobposted by Erik @ 20:35
"C'est un malheureux concours de circonstances", estime un commerçant témoin de la scène. "Le type n'a pas eu de chance, il avait le même visage que le violeur. N'importe quel père aurait fait pareil." Selon lui, l'incident était inévitable : "Un pédophile était en cavale depuis un an et la police ne réagissait pas. La loi de la rue a dû prendre le relais."A man resembling a pedophile known as the "stadium rapist" was almost killed by a lynch mob, writes Aurélie Collas in a Le Monde story that includes charges of police not doing their work. (A week after the aggression, the real suspect was arrested.) Ce sinistre incident s'est achevé à l'hôpital en réanimation : la victime, totalement défigurée, souffre de multiples fractures et contusions au visage, à l'abdomen et aux jambes.
Pay for "performance"?posted by Georges @ 19:17
Politicians and governmentalists continue to make the case for tax havens without even noticing:
While Congress has been flaying companies for giving out bonuses while on the government dole, lawmakers have a longstanding tradition of rewarding their own employees with extra cash -- also courtesy of taxpayers.The troughs are full, all is well, send more money.
posted by Georges @ 11:30 |
| FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been pre-authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, economic, scientific, social, art, media, and cultural issues. The 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material that may exist on this site is provided for under U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Section 107, material on this site is distributed without profit to persons interested in such information for research and educational purposes. If you want to use any copyrighted material that may exist on this site for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. // AVIS : En vertu de l'article L. 122-5 du Code de Propriété Intellectuelle, ce site Internet peut contenir des citations dont l'usage n'aura pas reçu l'autorisation du détenteur ou de la détentrice du droit d'auteur. La présentation de ces citations se fait dans le but de faciliter la découverte de divers sujets politiques, économiques, scientifiques, sociaux, artistiques, médiatiques ou encore culturels. L'article L. 122-5 du Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle dispose et autorise « les analyses et courtes citations justifiées par le caractère critique, polémique, pédagogique, scientifique ou d'information de l'oeuvre à laquelle elles sont incorporées ». A contrario, les emprunts qui excéderont les dispositions du « droit de citation », devront obtenir l'autorisation du détenteur ou de la détentrice du droit d'auteur. |