|
Site Mobile/WAP About "Che Mickey" à propos de "Che Mickey" No Pasaran on Twitter Nominated for: ![]() ![]() ![]()
Behind the Façades in France: What expats and the mainstream media (French and American alike) fail to notice (or fail to tell you) about French attitudes, principles, values, and official positions…
La France Dissident Frogman
Europa Barcepundit
America and Elsewhere Atlas
Iraq and Vicinity Iraq the Model
Books/Bouquins:
Cartoons:
Education:
MiF links:
Archives |
Saturday, March 07, 2009No new (DIRECT) taxesposted by Georges @ 13:10
Via the WSJ's ECO:nomics Conference:A worldwide cap-and-trade system to control carbon emissions would prove more effective than a global carbon tax, Caio Koch-Weser, former German deputy finance minister and vice chairman of Deutsche Bank, told the WSJ’s ECO:nomics conference Friday.Of course the true problem (from a politician's point of view) with trying to impose a carbon tax around the world is the direct nature of such a tax on the individual. We can't have that a time when the proles around the world are restless about their own economic futures. Best for government to tax them indirectly by having the costs of a cap and trade system buried deep in the price of end products for the consumer. The current epoch of history can be called many things, "Profiles in Courage" is not one of them.
Friday, March 06, 2009Quo Vadisposted by Erik @ 23:35
Wanting to have it both ways (as always)…
• It's an outrage! Rush Limbaugh is the de facto head of the Republican Party! — So why doesn't Barack Obama debate him? • Him?! Hah! Snort! Rushbo is nothing but a radio talk show host! — If he is nothing more than that, why do they make such a big deal about him?! • Why, you ask?! "Why"?! Because Rush is the de facto head of the Republican Party, that's why!!! — So why doesn't Barack Obama debate him? • Him?! Hah! Snort! Rushbo is nothing but a… Etc… Etc… Etc… Etc…
What We Want (and What We Don't Want)posted by Erik @ 23:14
What we conservatives want is for America to prevail, to go forward — to succeed.
When (say) George W Bush does (or did) something to make America succeed, we supported him (or we supported that policy). When GWB did something to make America fail, we wanted him (or his policy, rather) to fail. It is exactly the same with Barack Obama — whatever party he is a member of. If and when BHO does something to make America succeed, we support that policy (and thus the president). When BHO does something to make America fail, we hope to see that policy (and thus the president) fail. What on Earth (!) is so controversial about that?!?! Didn't untold numbers of liberals want Dubya to fail for the past 8 years?!? And his administration?!? And the Iraq War?!? Why is that fine, even laudable, while conservatives' opposition to policies is nothing short of an outrage and of treason!? Why the double standards?! To quote Rush Limbaugh (at CPAC): Now, about my still-to-me mysteriously controversial comment that I hope President Obama fails. I was watching the Super Bowl. And as you know, I love the Pittsburgh Steelers. [Cheers and Applause] So they have this miraculous scoring drive that puts them up by four, 15 seconds left. Kurt Warner on the field for the Cardinals. And I sure as heck want you to know I hope he failed. I did not want the Cardinals to win. I wanted Warner to make the biggest fool of himself possible. I wanted a sack, I wanted anything. I wanted the Steelers to win. I wanted to win. I wanted the Cardinals to fail.
EUtopia at a Glanceposted by Joe @ 13:13
It might have something to do with building ridiculous expectations of men or being just plain insufferable, but it seems that a majority of young German men would forego their hoochie mamas for broadband and Rosey palm and her five sisters.
Thursday, March 05, 2009The New Puritanismposted by Joe @ 17:12
Gordon Brown most polluting EU leader. That said, Boeings, as opposed to brand X, are irrationally impied to be at fault. ![]() Not unlike the songs of lider-praise that open and close the north Korean broadcast day, an unrelated requisite recitation of moral purity is tossed in at the end of the wire piece: The EU sees itself as the world leader on environmental issues, and the bloc's member states last December reaffirmed their commitment to cut carbon emissions and improve energy efficiency by 20 percent, both by 2020, in a bid to fight global warming.It need not be said that one must state this wherever possible because the programming is so deep that one need not write such a rule. George Romero would recognize this behavior right away. It can also be found here in this item where the matter of Europeans stiffing the 3rd world with the bill to “act on the climate change” that they’re employing transnational bodies to force them to do. At the same time, many of those reductions committed to by the EU will not really be performed domestically, as a large chunk of the 20 or 30 percent will come from so-called carbon offsets - essentially where wealthy countries pay poorer ones to make their carbon cuts for them.What will be especially funny is when they run out of deprived populations to project their non-existent crises on.
Wednesday, March 04, 2009They Love Death the Way You Love Lifeposted by Joe @ 12:48
It’s par for the course at
Maybe Some of Them Find Enforcement Eroticposted by Joe @ 10:44
Long famous for having a law for every occasion, Germans start toying with genetic cataloging and profiling. The jack-booted thugs are coming after your Aunt Lucille’s incontinent Pomeranian! Have they no shame?!?
Tuesday, March 03, 2009Threatening to Evaporate into that Great Transnational Nothingnessposted by Joe @ 10:27
Isn’t it funny? Europeans are the single group of people worldwide most interested in outsourcing their security and justice to the UN of the ICC in the name of consensus, cohesion, and global sameness. They also have a penchance for preferring excessive central control for no good reason over Federalism, and yet have no meaningful EU institutions with any sort of government powers.
Monday, March 02, 2009Some Posts...posted by Joe @ 22:44
EU to EU: Drop Deadposted by Georges @ 03:20
The result of yesterday's mini-summit in Brussels hits on many levels:European Union leaders, led by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, rejected a call by Hungary for a sweeping bailout of Eastern Europe, as the bloc struggled to find consensus on an approach to the spiraling financial crisis at a summit Sunday.Now, there are many valid reasons on both sides of the issue which led to the rejection of this request of some EU members by other EU members. However, the part that galls: But both the bailout and calls for Eastern European countries to join the euro sooner were coolly received by Western European nations. Ms. Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy both separately suggested that Eastern countries should look elsewhere -- to the International Monetary Fund, for instance -- for help.The World Bank is also mentioned as a source for possible bailout funds for the EU's very own Eastern European member states. Of course, the largest provider of funding to international financial institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank would be .... the United States. So, the denizens of solidarity, the champions of One Europe and the absolute true believers in an inescapable march to an ever closer union will turn not to Brussels but to Washington if/when a bailout of their very own member states is required. The dog whistle to alert the US taxpayer that a US bailout of EU member states is coming will be sounded this week when UK PM Gordon Brown visits Washington attempt to drum up US support for a "Global New Deal". If one hears the phrase "strengthening global financial institutions" coming out of the PM's mouth, the US taxpayer should take that as a cue to instinctively reach for their wallet (or what is left of it). There is one bit of good luck on the side of the US taxpayer in this developing story. The EU has unfortunately chosen one of their most hapless emissaries to
Sunday, March 01, 2009Next Time On “Who Wants to be Called a Superpower”posted by Joe @ 17:25
=Sarko managed a very insightful comment at the recent Munich security conference, albeit something absolutely no action can be expected will be taken on by the patchwork of continental statelets that just want humanity to hold them in high regard for no clear reason:
|
| FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been pre-authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, economic, scientific, social, art, media, and cultural issues. The 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material that may exist on this site is provided for under U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Section 107, material on this site is distributed without profit to persons interested in such information for research and educational purposes. If you want to use any copyrighted material that may exist on this site for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. // AVIS : En vertu de l'article L. 122-5 du Code de Propriété Intellectuelle, ce site Internet peut contenir des citations dont l'usage n'aura pas reçu l'autorisation du détenteur ou de la détentrice du droit d'auteur. La présentation de ces citations se fait dans le but de faciliter la découverte de divers sujets politiques, économiques, scientifiques, sociaux, artistiques, médiatiques ou encore culturels. L'article L. 122-5 du Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle dispose et autorise « les analyses et courtes citations justifiées par le caractère critique, polémique, pédagogique, scientifique ou d'information de l'oeuvre à laquelle elles sont incorporées ». A contrario, les emprunts qui excéderont les dispositions du « droit de citation », devront obtenir l'autorisation du détenteur ou de la détentrice du droit d'auteur. |